Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Settleball

Settleball

Sport invented a few months ago at one school, no sources to support article's claims of popularity/notability. Author removed prod tag without adding sources. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the above reasons. Czolgolz (talk) 20:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails notability guidelines for WP:GNG. A search finds zero results for Settleball. Essentially a game made-up at one school by a few school kids. — CactusWriter | ^needles 21:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFT Acebulf (talk) 21:08, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 21:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unfortunately, this doesn't even come close to meeting the notability guideline. No prejudice against creation at a future date when/if it becomes a notable sport, and that notability is verifiable. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 21:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:MADEUP and WP:N. No mention of this game anywhere, from what I could see. ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 22:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails notability guidelines. It's not a personal journal after all… Skarebo (talk) 09:35, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete - This is a game having just started, and of course it would not be all voer the web for this reason. Give it some time and it will take off. If it doesn't, then deletion can come into the picture. 18:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete, if the only reason not to delete is "It will take off", there's no good reason to keep; the previous argument is crystalballish. Nyttend (talk) 17:10, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete - the sport is already spread around a few schools including mine (wesley college). there is even talk of a tornement being set up next year between dublin schools