User talk:Ruslik0

This page is archived by MiszaBot III. Please, do not archive it manually.

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by when more than 7 sections are present.

Volcanism in Canada

Hi Ruslik0. Would you be interested to bring this article to FA status? It seems to be quite comprehensive in my opinion, but some of the references still need to be filled out. Black Tusk (talk) 20:46, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moons of Saturn and Oberon

Are you still planning to get those featured? Moons of Saturn is pretty much done. Not as sure about Oberon, but it looks pretty good to me. Are we finished with Magnetosphere of Jupiter? If so, do you want to go ahead and nominate it? After my relative failure with that article, I think I need to go back and get an FA of my very own. I think I might adopt a moon, maybe Miranda or Mimas. Serendi ^podous 21:50, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have. And I will get to it soon. Thanks BTW; there's enough info there to get at least go GA level. I barely understood half of what I read in trying to get to grips with magnetospherics, so I don't know how helpful I'd be in clarfying the page. Serendi ^podous 13:47, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you guys don't take this as butting in, but I think Oberon could use a bit of copyediting. I've started; it just needs a little mechanical cleanup. Ceranllama chat post 19:18, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You could probably add the magnetosphere infobox to Earth's magnetic field. Serendi ^podous 13:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FAC

I did not mean to do anything to cause you to withdraw the nomination. I just am unclear about a lot of the terminology and feel the reader might also be. The article is really nearly there.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 06:36, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. FAC is an incredibly picky process. Why not withdraw the withdraw?--Wehwalt (talk) 12:32, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may be right after all. I actually was in an incredibly bad mood in the morning today (it is not related to Wikipedia). :-) Ruslik (talk) 13:42, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should unwithdraw the nomination before they close it out and give it a go.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 13:57, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have done this. Ruslik (talk) 14:00, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Request

Mr.Ruslik0 , This article Chiang Kai-shek now frequently Vandalism by anonymous IP address, so I consider this article should be became full-protected or semi-protected for a long time. thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.105.23.162 (talk) 15:09, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Hacker Halted

You Deleted the page Hacker Halted under the Speedy Deletion criteria CSD G11. While I do not have a copy of the page to review, When I wrote the article, There were not many third party refernces to add to the article, but I do not remember writing it in a manner that was consistant with G11, and i've seen my share of G11 canidates. I would like to ask you to undelete the article so I can review it and we can go from there. Thank you for your time. Sephiroth storm (talk) 15:15, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hacker Halted added a long new section to it about the future conference in Miami, which was obviously promotional (it included contact details and specific language like "Hacker Halted USA 2009 is proud to have world renowned security experts comprising..."). Taking into account that this section was longer than all other sections combined, I deleted the article. Well, if you think that the conference is really notable, and the article can be rewritten in an encyclopedic style consistent with Wikipedia editing guidelines, I am ready to undelete it. Ruslik (talk) 15:43, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you make a userspace copy for me? I'll go and see if I can make a good article from it. Thanks! Sephiroth storm (talk) 13:13, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Sephiroth storm (talk) 13:28, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ruslik

I responded to your comments here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Economy of the Han Dynasty/archive1.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 20:58, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, I have responded to your comments.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 15:29, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saxbe fix FA and TFA

This user helped promote Saxbe fix to featured article status.

This user helped promote Saxbe fix to the main page as Today's Featured Article on 6 March 2009.

I am recognizing you for being one of the many people who came together to improve Saxbe fix as part of its development which has resulted in its WP:FA and WP:TFA status.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 16:49, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ruslik0

Hello, Ruslik0 , This article Chiang Ching-kuo now frequently Vandalism by anonymous IP address, ( just like Chiang Kai-shek ), so please protect this article right now. thank you. Eeeeeewtw (talk) 12:24, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]