User talk:Fyyer

Message

Hello, Fyyer. You have new messages at Addshore's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 11:29, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting edits

Hey, no problem, I see now why you thought I was vandalising. Thanks for taking another look. (Sorry for posting here, I have no idea how to send a message on wikipedia).

Sorry

Sorry, I think something went wrong with reverting somewhere.... Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 19:26, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good Work

I've just been watching your anti-vandal patrol and it's good. However, my edit at 119 (number) was Ok, and I'm not sure about John Adams - maybe check that one again. Cheers, 82.20.44.6 (talk) 20:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. This is the third time this has happened to me in so many weeks, twice under my account - I'm not logged in right now as I'm just passing the time on a public machine. Think I might be doing something wrong?

I can see why this would happen, and Wikipedia needs people who own up to their mistakes much more than it needs people who don't make them. So thanks. --130.232.106.75 (talk) 14:24, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Thank you for your attention to Greek, but please read the rationale in Talk:Greek#Anal_sex which explains why my contribution was not vandalism.

Thank you. --86.5.88.230 (talk) 15:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't a test

Shut up.75.130.172.97 (talk) 21:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was giving you the benefit of the doubt. Are you telling me you were vandalizing then? :) Fyyer 21:41, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I final-warned the user for personal attacks, which followed quickly with me being called a stalker, at which point I blocked for 55 hours :) Don't worry about stuff like this Stwalkerster [ talk ] 21:55, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dead Or Alive: Code Chronos

A user by the name of New Age Retro Hippie is constantly deleting the information page for the videogame Dead or Alive: Code Chronos. His reasoning for is claiming that there hasn't been any new information on the game by the developer. However, the game hasn't been confirmed as cancelled (and shouldn't be considered as such) as the user is trying to claim and has been merely considered Vaporware. The user is speculating with no valid evidence to support their claim. All attempts to try and reason with the user have ended up fruitless in a reverting war. The user appears to revert moreso as a personal vendetta than anything else.Beem2 (talk) 23:55, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've opened up a discussion on the articles page, I would recommend both you and New Age Retro Hippie discuss it. Try to get more opinions from the people who are contributed significantly to the article or who have contributed significantly to an article similar in nature. Such as Dead or Alive (series). Fyyer 01:12, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indian English

It's a mess and I am trying to clean it up. Please wait till I am done then take to discssuion seciton. Thanks. 75.101.11.171 (talk) 21:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just trying to help. Normally I make tiny edits, but the page is a big mess. Its easy for you to revert me, you can do so at any time. But I ask that you take a look in the discussion section at comments people have mae about how the article has strayed. I have also added a discussion section and asked people to review my bold edits. Most likely admins won't let it stand because they are so cautious about vandals but I had to try. 75.101.11.171 (talk) 22:11, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're fine, it was my mistake, removed your warnings. :-) Fyyer 22:25, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Boudica

Surely the article should use British English? Dougweller (talk) 16:52, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it should, which is why I haven't reverted it since. Fyyer 21:27, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks, I just wanted to discuss it with you to make sure we agreed, which I thought we probably did. Dougweller (talk) 08:37, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Michio Hoshino

The photo referred to in the links IS a fake, and since people often go to wikipedia for confirmation the correct info would seem helpful rather than leaving the speculation there. But perhaps it would be better to remove the link completely. ~~Anyway, I'm leaving the incorrect info there, since you obviously prefer it that way.~~

Damn, you caught me in a pissy mood yesterday, sorry. I removed the erroneous link completely now instead, and made a note of the blog/photoshop issue on the talk page for those who want more info since it really doesn't belong on the main page at all. Apologies for the attitude, just something about the impersonality of the instant revert and the form message that ticked me off. 83.226.153.222 (talk) 08:12, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, yes it would be best to remove that link entirely. I would have removed it myself had I read a little closer. Thanks for removing it. Fyyer 08:16, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Great work on the RCP, I often see you around and your reverting is flawless, fast, and much appreciated. Keep up your work Kingpin¹³ (talk) 07:31, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all, you sure deserve it :), surprised you haven't got one yet. Enjoy :) - Kingpin¹³ (talk)

CVU

Sir, I'm really scared about my level 2 wikipedia vandal standing. Since you are a member of the CVU I was hoping you could tell me when my wiki-court date is and how many wiki-dollars it costs to clean my terrible, horrible, disgraceful vandalism. You see, I just haven't been my self since I started huffing that nasty paint thinner, but you know, we all have our delusions- mine happens to be the tingly hug I get from those delicious fumes, and yours is apparently the feeling of power and importance you manage to squeeze out of eliminating cyber-vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.65.250.9 (talk) 23:35, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's obvious you're not here to build an encyclopedia. So please stop vandalizing. Fyyer 23:39, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's the internet, stop taking it so seriously.

Koh-e-Murad

Not to seem pushy, but you seem to have reverted my cleanup on the Koh-e-Murad article - a page connected to the Zikris, which in itself is a mess and something I attempted to piece together. Just wanted to inform you that I'm not some vandal or anything. :) 96.238.41.5 (talk) 00:12, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Those were good faith edits, my mistake. :-) Fyyer 00:14, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! You seem to be doing some great work - keep it up! 96.238.41.5 (talk) 00:16, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen the work you've done

		An Anti-vandalism sack of potatoes
		So here is something to show that you've been keeping Wikipedia clean.Abce2\|AccessDenied 02:06, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! --Abce2|AccessDenied 23:50, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll stop adding NPOV tags...

When the authors of those pages devote equal time to ALL relevant points of view!