Jump to content

Talk:Armoured fighting vehicle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 91.176.6.252 (talk) at 11:01, 16 June 2009 (Is an APC an AFV?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconMilitary history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military land vehicles task force
Taskforce icon
Military science, technology, and theory task force
Taskforce icon
Weaponry task force

Merge

This is not much of an article, serving as only a list of links. Armoured fighting vehicle classification serves a similar purpose, but has a little more meat, and helps explain the main types. There's no reason why that material shouldn't be here, with a bit more of an introduction. Michael Z. 2006-02-03 19:45 Z

I agree. Bukvoed 12:54, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Thanks for the support. Michael Z. 2006-02-20 17:31 Z

innacurate

ive noted that most tank related articals on wikipedia are in serious need of an experts opinion, they did well with the most recent edit of the overall tank page. but i would like to note that armoured cars also fall into the catagory of AFV's. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.41.195.26 (talk) 14:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

incorrect redirect from armored vehicle

armored vehicle should not direct to "Armored Fighting Vehicle." I literally am looking for armored (hardened) vehicles such as SUVs, limousines, and others used by diplomats, heads of state, etc.

Fair use rationale for Image:Cv90 8.jpg

Image:Cv90 8.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:20, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wheeled IFVs

This article says little about wheeled IFVs such as the ATF Dingo or Force Protection Industries Cougar HE. This is the fastest growing vehicle category, and should probably be mentioned. Tmaull 21:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Top Ten

  1. M113 Arm Per carrier- US (over 80,000 built, 40+ years service)
  2. M2 Bradley - US
  3. MCV80 Warrior – British
  4. Stryker - US
  5. "Haninag"? sp.? - Ger - can't find this one
  6. BMP-1
  7. Universal Carrier
  8. M3 Bradley or M3 Scout car, not sure??
  9. LTV 4 Alligator – US, British
  10. Hummvee
* See also: List of military vehicles
Rated by Military Channel's "Top Ten Infantry Fighting Vehicles" program, aired 9 Dec 07, 10:00AM MST. With interruptions, I got most of the Top 10 List, can anyone help here. Thank you. LanceBarber (talk) 18:26, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Is 5. the SdKfz 251 halftrack, designed by Hanomag? Beegfrog (talk) 18:47, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I must concur that this list looks reasonable, however it's unclear which is the criteria used to compile it. Number produced? Number of armies using a vehicle? Having been "cutting edge" at IOC/prototype testing? Any other? Please clarify, and provide a "verifiable" source for the "top ten"; as this can be cause of a never-ending dispute. Cheers, DPdH (talk) 00:04, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, the M3 Bradley ... mainly conducts scout missions and carries two scouts in addition to the regular crew of three (as per wikiarticle M3 Bradley), hence it's not an IFV, so it must be removed from this top-ten IFV list. And as it's a variant of the to the M2 Bradley, this would be twice in the list (anyway!). Cheers, DPdH (talk) 00:09, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Finally, the Hummvee is NOT an IFV! As per it's own wikiarticle, ...is a military 4WD motor vehicle created by AM General. It has largely supplanted the roles formerly served by the M151 1/4 ton MUTT, the M561 "Gama Goat", their M718A1 and M792 ambulance versions, the CUCV, and other light trucks with the United States military, .... So it must be removed from this top-ten IFV list. Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 00:15, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mecha

Sorry to have reverted the major addition of mecha, but this article is not about fiction. Regards. Michael Z. 2008-05-29 04:39 z

Is an APC an AFV?

Is an armoured personnel carrier (APC) an armoured fighting vehicle? If so, shouldn't this article have a summary section about APCs, similar to the sections about tanks etc. On the other hand, if an APC is not an AFV (because it is designed primarily to transport infantry, not for direct combat), then the APC article needs changes. Nurg (talk) 22:29, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Monowheel AFV's

Should monowheel afv's be mentioned seperatly ?Monowheel afv's are I believe not tracked since the "wheel" is rigid and not loosely transformable (not sure whether it contains air)?