Jump to content

User talk:The Fat Man Who Left but Returned a Short While Later

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by The Fat Man Who Left but Returned a Short While Later (talk | contribs) at 02:40, 22 June 2009 (wow, it's really not my day). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

March 2008

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for user impersonation. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. - Philippe | Talk 00:33, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Fat Man Who Left but Returned a Short While Later (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please unblock me, just for a few minutes. I'm merely trying to contribute to the humorous conversation taking place here

Decline reason:

It's possible you've mistaken Wikipedia for a chat forum or something. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 00:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Oh the heck with it. Unblocked. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 04:55, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Wack Pack

Um, Philippe, I have another question for you.... when I was logged in as User:The Fat Man Who Never Came Back, I asked you to please semi protect The Wack Pack page, but I think you unprotected[1] it instead, by accident. Could you fix this problem? The "Irish John" vandal is back.--The Fat Man Who Left but Returned a Short While Later (talk) 00:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. It's done now. - Philippe | Talk 01:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Any chance of unblocking my sock?--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 01:47, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively here, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did with this edit to User talk:The Fat Man Who Never Came Back. You may wish to read the introduction to editing for more information about Wikipedia. Thank you. Eugene Krabs (talk) 02:32, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. J.delanoygabsadds 02:33, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

The Fat Man Who Left but Returned a Short While Later (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was actually trying to revert vandalism to the Shirley Phelps article, but I didn't go back as many versions as I should have. I will be more careful next time. Won't you be a dear and please unblock me?

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was actually trying to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shirley_Phelps-Roper&diff=prev&oldid=297837852 revert vandalism to the Shirley Phelps article], but I didn't go back as many versions as I should have. I will be more careful next time. Won't you be a dear and please unblock me? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was actually trying to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shirley_Phelps-Roper&diff=prev&oldid=297837852 revert vandalism to the Shirley Phelps article], but I didn't go back as many versions as I should have. I will be more careful next time. Won't you be a dear and please unblock me? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was actually trying to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shirley_Phelps-Roper&diff=prev&oldid=297837852 revert vandalism to the Shirley Phelps article], but I didn't go back as many versions as I should have. I will be more careful next time. Won't you be a dear and please unblock me? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}