Talk:The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 |
![]() | The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||
Elder Scrolls 5
I just found out that Elder Scrolls 5 is being released in 2010. It says so when you google it. The website is wired.com , and it is a legitimate article. I tried to edit the Elder scrolls 4 page and adding a sequel section but I have no experience in putting references in a page. Can someone do this for me please . If you could I would appreciate it. (User talk:DavidEGonzalez) —Preceding undated comment was added at 21:41, 26 November 2008 (UTC).
- What's the address of the reference? nneonneo talk 22:35, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- The appropriate location for such information (should it prove verifiable by reliable sources) would be the Elder Scrolls series page, over here. For an example of how to do this, see Kingdom Hearts (series), under Future of the series. If you have a significant amount of information, then you produce an entirely new page. In any case, it does not go here. Thanks! Geuiwogbil (Talk) 23:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- (As you can see, there is already this brief note over at The Elder Scrolls: "In late October 2008, Bethesda has indicated that the series' fifth installment will be released in 2010", sourced to GamesIndustry.Biz, which is quite a reliable source. If you have more information, put it there until the article gets so bloated you have to split it off. 'Kay? Geuiwogbil (Talk) 23:16, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Reception
The reception needs to be rewritten... at least the cons section as alot is comes off as personal opinion despite there being a number of real reviewers with actual cons. Stabby Joe (talk)
Add site which prevents crashes and bugs?
I recently found this website: Prevent Crashes in Oblivion. It is an enormous list of ways to prevent bugs and crashes in TES4:Oblivion (I play this game myself and Oblivion does tend to crash excessively).
I was thinking that it should be added here. It would probably be a great help to most Oblivion gamers (it definatly helped me). What is everyone's opinion about adding this? 41.157.12.3 (talk) 13:05, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
- This discussion is transcluded from Talk:The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
I am doing the GA Reassessment on this article as part of the GA Sweeps project.
The article is great and certainly at A level and I would keep it as GA except for the fact that refs 41, 43, 52, 56, 58, and 68 are dead links. This is too many dead links to overlook. I will hold the article for one week pending work on this. It shouldn't take much to fix this. H1nkles (talk) 21:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Please list the refs that aren't working for you- all of the ones you listed are just fine for me. --PresN 22:21, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- FYI the refs are off by one number, please check the following links: 42, 44, 53, 57, 59, 69, and also 85 is a dead link. I apologize for the confusion. H1nkles (talk) 22:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Alright, they've all been replaced/removed, with the exception of #44 (now #43) - the site is down for temporary maintenance, and since its hosted by Bethesda themselves as the official place you can buy the DLC's, I have no doubts that it will return shortly. --PresN 03:39, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- FYI the refs are off by one number, please check the following links: 42, 44, 53, 57, 59, 69, and also 85 is a dead link. I apologize for the confusion. H1nkles (talk) 22:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
The dead refs have been fixed and I'll keep the article at GA, well done. H1nkles (talk) 01:48, 5 June 2009 (UTC)