User talk:Inuit18
Re: Badghis
You did delete sourced information (population). You used NPS as your source and deleted information that were provided by the government of Afghanistan. Here in wikipedia, we are trying to use the most reliable, comprehensive and upto-date sources that we can possibly find. Yes I have used AIMS and NPS as a reference in several places, and that is because those were the most reliable sources that I could find. I prefer to use MRRD, but they don't cover everything.
Now that you have added both estimates, there is no objection from my side. (Ketabtoon (talk) 05:00, 5 August 2009 (UTC))
Speedy deletion nomination of Bahrudeen Baes
A tag has been placed on Bahrudeen Baes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Favonian (talk) 22:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Blocked
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. — Kralizec! (talk) 20:16, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Inuit18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
May you please tell me why I got blocked.
Decline reason:
I imagine it has to do with the warnings you deleted here, here, and here. --jpgordon::==( o ) 21:39, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Inuit18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I removed those tags by mistake while doing my edits. I am a new user on this website and I had no bad intention when I removed those tags. so I apologize if it caused any problems for other wikipedians. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I removed those tags by mistake while doing my edits. I am a new user on this website and I had no bad intention when I removed those tags. so I apologize if it caused any problems for other wikipedians. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I removed those tags by mistake while doing my edits. I am a new user on this website and I had no bad intention when I removed those tags. so I apologize if it caused any problems for other wikipedians. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
reverted your unconstructive and un-explained edits
I have revereted your unconstructive edits from Laghman Province, Farah Province, Logar Province and Takhar Province. Please avoid deleting or rewording sourced information to match an ethnic POV. It is also a good idea to use the discussion section. (Ketabtoon (talk) 21:49, 14 August 2009 (UTC))
Those edits were done by a banned user. I even reverted some of them back to your edits like this one [[1]]. --Inuit18 (talk) 21:55, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- This IP address was checked by an administrator on 26 July 2009 who said "Unrelated I determined that this was in fact a different user (who is not currently blocked)".
- Please stop adding distorted percentages to wikipedia articles, adding Persian names to places where Persian is not spoken (as you did to Zabul province), and removing reliable verifiable sources. 119.152.247.228 (talk) 05:33, 15 August 2009 (UTC)