Jump to content

User talk:Cptnono

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dvornicsek (talk | contribs) at 13:47, 27 August 2009 (→about photos: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rainier Club

I replied on my talk page. The short of it: yes, it is on the National Register, but the Register lists it as being of "state significance", not "national significance". I know that's confusing; my reply on my talk page gives a couple of relevant links that should make it clearer. - Jmabel | Talk 16:13, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BART Police shooting of Oscar Grant

re: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BART_Police_shooting_of_Oscar_Grant&action=history

I don't know where or how to start a "talk" on Oscar Grant page as you apparently suggested, but you rudely removed a valuable link I added regarding the Justice for Oscar Grant Movement. In what sort of way do you "own" this issue? Why would I need your permission to add a link? In what way are you an "expert" on the facts of the case and the demonstrations? The www.indybay.org/oscargrant page linked to includes more information on the case than any other single source on the murder and the following related events, definitely more so than wiki here. It is probably THE definitive archive on the subject. There is a ton of original material found no where else on the web, such as the actual court transcripts from Mehserle's preliminary hearing, unedited audio from related BART meetings, a tribute video by Oscar Grant's family, and much much more. It is rather problematic that you would assume only corporate reports have value when I could go through a good number of the corporate "news" links here and point out factual and contextual issue after issue with their reporting. (Also, the SF Chron page linked to hasn't even been updated since March. Yikes.)

I would greatly appreciate you undoing your deletion of that link. I actually intend to include more links to specific indybay.org posts relevant to certain passages in the wiki Oscar Grant piece as time allows. The first link is just to the Oscar Grant overview page but more specificity can be added to the wiki page over time.

  • To see an article talk page click on the "discussion tab at the top of the article page. I have copied this over there as well.
  • I removed the link per Wikipedia:External links not to be rude or because I think only corporations have the right to present news.
  • Indybay is s biased coverage of the event and does not meet standards. You can ask about it here if you plan on using it as a source. Even if consensus says it is OK for a particular inline citation, we can not use it as an external link. The first thing the reader sees when clicking on it is "Justice for Oscar Grant" and that Grant was "murdered". This is coverage that can not be trusted due to its bias and we do not need to facilitate leading the reader to a conclusion in that way. There is still a criminal preceding to see if it was murder and to determine what sort of justice is required.
  • I'm not an expert. I am someone editing a Wikipedia article. Don't be so snide and try to assume good faith or at least follow the civility guidelines.
  • If you can stay neutral, take a look at Wikipedia:Reliable sources and start contributing.Cptnono (talk) 23:42, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sea Shepherds

Thanks for the help in this section. I'm not anti Sea-Shepherds but the more POV pushing that keeps coming from some of the people defending them really seems to be ruining the article. --68.41.80.161 (talk) 22:16, 6 July 2009 (UTC) Again, great job with the Seal hunt section. Very NPOV. --68.41.80.161 (talk) 00:25, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We were editing at the same time. I may have accidentally edited over a change you made. Will you plase check your last edit to make sure it still exists? My appologies. --68.41.80.161 (talk) 05:21, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'll stick around to help with that cleanup stuff. I need to learn about proper refs anyways. :) This is fun now that the revert wars have stopped. --68.41.80.161 (talk) 05:57, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It appears the pendulum is swinging back to the pro-Shepherds side again. All eary history has been removed. The article has become whitewashed. Help! --70.55.234.108 (talk) 01:20, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion

There is an interesting merge discussion going on at Talk:Cupcake. You might want to poke your head in on it. --Jeremy (blah blah) 08:48, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merges for Food and Drink

Based on your recent participation in several Food and Drink related merge discussion, I would like to point out several open discussions that might interest you:

--Jeremy (blah blah) 05:11, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zitwer

Barbara Zitwer -I see you removed the notabilty tag from here, and I've comment about that on the articles talk page, have you read the general notability guidline? This gives a requirement for multiple sources which cover the subject directly in detail. It doesn't call for 100's of trivial references. As you removed the tag perhaps you can pick out the references which are covering the subject directly in detail. I'm actually going to disengage now as to date my involvement in trying to get the user in question to understand the idea of what is required to demonstrate notability, seems to be not going anywhere. --82.7.40.7 (talk) 08:10, 11 July 2009 (UTC) : If I didn't think she met the requirement, I'd have nominated it for deletion. The notability tag is the correct one to use where the article doesn't demonstrate the notability properly, as the template says: "Please help to establish notability by adding reliable, secondary sources about the topic.". i.e. please fix this by adding the things it lacks. Again since you removed the tag presumably you believe it meets that requirement, can you please let me know which of the numerous references do that. --82.7.40.7 (talk) 09:08, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A request

Hi there. First, I inserted some additional links to the bottom of the Talk Page, some of them are for you. There's no one but you who can do with them something. Second, as a leading expert in military affairs, I have a request - there's an unresolved discussion, "Hamas response to rocket attacks", between Cryptonio and myself. Not the most important issue, but if you'll spare couple of minutes - that would be nice. In a nutshell - he inserted Hamas response to rocket attacks criticism in a controversial place. The question is whether to leave it or move to another section. Thanks. --Sceptic Ashdod (talk) 20:21, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you notice the source about termination of the Iranian unit of Hamas? --Sceptic Ashdod (talk) 21:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Did you notice the reply on my talk page (because sometimes the notification doesn't pop up).

Couldn't understand what is the disputed edit in Al-Fakhura school article. Wanna take it to the talk page? --Sceptic from Ashdod (talk) 11:21, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think a line about Iranian unit can be compacted along with 'Several high-ranking Hamas commanders were killed...' etc. I'm sure more of similar info can be found in ITIC bulletins, but it will give an undue weight to the whole thing. Maybe later I'll have a look for additional info. As for Naval stuff, I'm really quite ignorant here and don't recall other publications on the topic. Maybe in future, when we have time and desire to construct serious section on weaponry used in the conflict, we'll make serious effort to find out more. --Sceptic from Ashdod (talk) 09:36, 28 July 2009 (UTC) One more thing. Take a look, if you missed this testimony. --Sceptic from Ashdod (talk) 09:56, 28 July 2009 (UTC) And this is how it was reported in KUNA. --Sceptic from Ashdod (talk) 10:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Started new section, I think you'll like it. Anyway, your opinion would be appreciated. --Sceptic from Ashdod (talk) 19:24, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For you

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your repeated removal of vandalism on the Sounders FC page and for regularly keeping the riffraff under control when they try to act up on the page. SkotyWATalk|Contribs 06:22, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok

Ok, i will. By the way, i read it partially and i noticed someone requested for japanese sources. I know a bit of japanese (very basic, but i can read well) and i may be able to obtain them.

I found this one already: Http://www.j-cast.com/2008/01/16015654.html

-187.21.252.221 (talk) 12:51, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Thanks!

..for the barnstar. I blame Family Guy. Sean.hoyland - talk 04:45, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Corey Mesler

Hi, I've removed a PROD notice you added to this article and thought you'd like to know. If you PROD articles in the future can you make sure you say that you are in the edit summary? You probably just forgot but I'm not 100% sure. Thanks Smartse (talk) 01:46, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sea Shepherds Racism edit

Hi! Just wanted to point out- I'm not lobbying for the inclusion of something about possible racism on the part of the Sea Shepherds as much as I am attempting to defend an argument made by the original poster to that thread that I fell has merit, but that was dismissed out of hand by someone else. And as far as the edit you responded to, I pretty much had to respond to the previous user's claim that since they have been seen eating sushi the Sea Shepherds aren't racist! That kind of ignorance cannot go unchecked, as it is thinking like that which is the source of much of the trouble we have with race in society today. Thanks, SpudHawg948 (talk) 10:22, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Jennings

Jay Jennings Image/Summary

Can you be more specific and detailed regarding your comment left on the other page? I'm not too familiar with it. What exactly has to be done, added, and where? Timemachine1967 (talk) 18:26, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Jennings/Vogue Theatre Correction Made

Under Career/Films, you mistakenly internally-linked The Vogue Theatre to Wikipedia's article on The Vogue Theatre in Vancouer. Loanshark premiered at The Vogue Theatre on Hollywood Boulevard (which is obviously a different theatre with the same name), which is what the "L.A. Times Best Bet" section is referring to in it's headline. It's important to mention Hollywood Boulevard in the sentence because there are alot of old, famous theatres on the boulevard, including The Vogue, therefore that connection has to be made. So, I corrected that little section to reflect that. Timemachine1967 (talk) 18:50, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Jennings Deletion Made No Sense

The consensus was to keep, but the article was deleted anyways? What a farce! There is no legitimacy here, as elitist administrators have the last word. Truly pathetic. Thanks for your help nonetheless. Timemachine1967 (talk) 04:14, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your userfied article is at User:Cptnono/Jay Jennings. Please let me know when you have some specific sources to review. Spartaz Humbug! 05:00, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All this back and forth bickering with administrators is pointless and counterproductive. In my view, if Mr. Jennings' article couldn't be accepted as is with his films and author info intact, then it's pointless to continue trying to get it accepted in some alternate form that's missing bits and pieces from its original article. If only the author stuff is included, then omitting his film work is unfair, and visa versa. As I said, this is my opinion. At this point, it's probably best to just delete the article from your talk section, userfield, and from Wikipedia. Perhaps myself or maybe another fan will give it a go another time (maybe sometime next year). Once again, thanks for your help. Timemachine1967 (talk) 07:40, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Jennings Newspaper Articles/Interviews Have Been E-mailed To You

This should help. Timemachine1967 (talk) 22:06, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Minor editing, slight grammatical corrections, and clarifications made to article on your user page. I like what you've done with it so far. Timemachine1967 (talk) 08:25, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing the article

I'm sorry but whats there sint helpful for you because i can't access the sources or the source xdoesnt appear reliable or the depth of coverage of jennings himself isn't clear. You can see fuller comments on the talk page of the userfied article. Spartaz Humbug! 19:25, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

notable players

no offense, but apparently you don't know history. over 30 players since 1975 have played for both the timbers and sounders. if you want to be a history stat nazi, like you have proven to be. then you either include some of them (notables), or ALL of them. Kevin Forrest is in the second category. He has only played for these two clubs since 2008! Once again, if you want to include him, then include the other 30 players. I highly disregard you do this, we don't need a list of players that most fans have never heard about. they will definitely know who bain, hugo, keller, etc are. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.145.195.34 (talk) 23:29, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cptnono. You have new messages at Deville's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Deletionism

I admit that I can be a deletionist at times but there are also articles that I have saved recently such as Kakha Kaladze, Sunil Chhetri and Baichung Bhutia. Spiderone (talk) 15:04, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 5f304a1824a59a0595cd609572c92995

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

László Marton

Dear Cptnono!

Thank you for your information! You are saying in your note that I should finish editing the page.

Is there a way I could finish it? Of course I am willing to cooperate in order to get it done. I could get all the information off that seems promotion like to you, and just leave minimal information. FACTS, if you prefer.

If I dont't finish it, It's just hanging there...

Thank you,

and looking for your further help:

DvornicsekDvornicsek (talk) 13:10, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some information changed in my article is wrong.

László Martons "international" carreer started in Weimar, his Hungarian started in 1967. So below the picture, him, being active from 1974 is a mistake.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dvornicsek (talk • contribs) 13:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i'm sorry, but he is active from 1967. Thnak you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dvornicsek (talk • contribs) 13:32, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I appreciate all your help. Really! So as you suggested, to sort thing out, first I'm trying to go for a subpage. DvornicsekDvornicsek (talk) 13:49, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok!

Thank you soooooooooooooooo much! :) DvornicsekDvornicsek (talk) 14:14, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cptnono!

I'm not a wikipedia guru, as you can see, but I'm trying really hard. :)

The best I could do (trying to focus on your advise) is that I created a sandbox for my article (I could'nt manage something you call a subpage). But this is what I did: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dvornicsek/Sandbox

so I tried to do a cleanup.

I have two things to say/ask:

1. I erased almost every theatre review, leaving only 4 (one for each important show). So maybe this helps with the problem of being too promotional. But I would like to do the right thing and if you say, 4 reviews is still too much, I could erase more.

2. I got a notification that I should do the article in prose. The list of directed plays and awards can't really be turned into prose. It is a long list, a work of 40(!) years. And I see other wikipedia pages with artists/writers/painters/directors listing their lifetime work. So am I doing something wrong?


Hope I'm not bugging you too much! THANK YOU!!!!!! Dvornicsek (talk) 15:29, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Progress!

Hi Cptnono!

I think my article looks better now!

This is what I did:

1. As you suggested I looked for other director articles on Wikipedia: "Theatre Directors" (and "Well-known theatre directors"). I got some styling guideline from articles on "Lee Stasberg", Julie Taymor" and "Mike Nichols". Those pages seem to be ok, so I took editing ideas from them. 2. I erased every extra information, I think it is dry and neutral enough for an encyclopedia. 3. The long list of productions looks professional now, I edited it according to how "Well-known theatre directors" do itz on Wikipedia. 4. I moved "Awards" way down, so I'm not pushing that information. 5. I brought theatre reviews to a minimum. Four all together. 6. I put "About him" back. Just as I saw this on other Wikipedia articles. For example: "Péter Esterházy". That page for example is not taged, so I think this is acceptable.

What are your thoughts?

Here is my article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dvornicsek/Sandbox

Would you be so kind as to take a look at it? I trust you and I would love to know what you think.

Do you think it is good enough to post it? Who gets to deside that?

Thank you!

marton

I got rid of all the reviews. I kept it strictly professional (most of the directors don't add a "personal life" catherory) and I focused on "career". I think this is the best I could do. Would you please take a look? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dvornicsek/Sandbox Thank you:Dvornicsek (talk) 17:17, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

photo

Hi Cptnono!

You deleted my images earlier and I'd like to know how is it possible to get them back. As the article is much shorter than before, I would need just a few production pictutes, not the whole pakage.

But I'm having a REALLY hard time with licencing the photos. I read the wiki pages about that but I ABSOLUTELY don't understand how to do it.

The picture of the director that is still on my page needs to be licenced as well, otherwise it'll be deleted soon.

Thanks AGAIN for your help. Dvornicsek (talk) 23:23, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

photos

Thank you sooooooooo much for offernig your help with the photo licences. I'm lost!

Here is the gallery of my photos: (though I don't need all, now that the article is shorter) http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/Gallery.php?wikifam=commons.wikimedia.org&wikilang=en&order=-img_timestamp&img_user_text=Dvornicsek&ofs=0&max=50

I read the pages you suggested (about choosing a cathegory for the licence). But I have no idea.

I took the photo that is on the page already: "László Marton theate director.jpg" (I MISSPELLED the word "THEATRE". Could that be corrected, and could I change the names of uploaded photos?) It says: "No license tag".

All the other pictures are from his productions. I got permission to you use these pics earlier for a book (as you know already). Two are marked: "No permission". Why those two?


SO WHAT DO I HAVE TO DO AS A FIRST STEP?

Thank you: Dvornicsek (talk) 00:56, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wow!

Wow! That sounds too good to be true! Dvornicsek (talk) 01:26, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

pics

Yes, understood. It is not a consern. I'd like to go with it. Thanks for the tip.

1. Now I have a really basic question. I'm sure I should know this. But I don't :(

I'm not sure I did the right thing. I signed in at wikimedia commons. Edited the photo: where it said "permission" I wrote: =

Is that it? Something still seems wrong to me:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:L%C3%A1szl%C3%B3_Marton_theate_director.jpg

2. And my other problem:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Marton.Platonov.jpg&action=edit

Here's a picture I licenced before (and a coulpe more with my very same question). IS THIS THE same LICENCE YOU CHOSE? So is this ok? Or something's still missing from this one?

Could you please show me (once we actually chose the licence:

WHAT EGZACTLY IT IS I DO?

I mean basic things like what do I type whrere... And how do I place the photo into my article. (It seemd easier when I uploaded them, but now that they are there I don't know how to build it in the article.) Thank you and Ohhhh. Dvornicsek (talk) 13:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cptnono!

I uploaded my photos and licenced them according to your suggestion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dvornicsek/Sandbox

Are they ok?

All my photo files say they are "uncategorised". I read the wikipage about catgories, but don't have a clue what caterory to put them in.

Thank you: Dvornicsek (talk) 16:51, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

deleating

Oh no!

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dvornicsek Dvornicsek (talk) 16:56, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

photos

Hi Cptnono!

I finally uploaded all the photos I would like to use in my article, licenced them and put all of them in a category. Would you take a look at my sandbox page, please?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dvornicsek/Sandbox

I got the bad news today, that all my uploaded pictures are up for deleating and I do NOT know hat to do!!! :( Dvornicsek (talk) 00:29, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank you CPtnono, for responding.

I took some of the pictures (I don't know how I prove that) and some (taken by other authors) I already got permission for to use in earlier works (book). Do I need to e-mail permissions somewhere that they agree to give the photos for this article for wikimedia commons? Where do I e-mail the permissions?

Dvornicsek (talk) 02:03, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would ask LX at the link I provided. He is probably more knowledgeable on the images and what you can do about the ones you did not actually take. I would expect it to be something like getting the original author to send in a quick email Although it is easy enough, is it worth bothering with it? For the ones you did take yourself, it isn't about proving a thing. The info on some of them looked off and it came to LX's attention. Simply tell him that you did take some of them and I am sure he will understand. Thanks for the honesty on it and I am sorry if I gave you the wrong impression on copyrights :( .Cptnono (talk) 02:16, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

no.

No.No. It wasn't you! It was me. :) I misunderstood. Thanks for everything you're doing to help me!!! Dvornicsek (talk) 02:20, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Barbbiggs

I'm going to take the liberty of archiving the talk page for User:Barbbiggs. I'd like to get to the point in which the two of you work more collaboratively together on any concerns either of you have; in the meantime, though, if you have any direct concerns or criticism with her edits or comments, would you consider emailing me or leaving a message on my talk page, first? For a short while, maybe it would help if I serve as a "middleman" of sorts; once the two of you are both on the same page, so to speak, you can then "cut me out."  :) This is completely up to you, I just think it might be a path to slightly more harmonious editing in the future. Please let me know (feel free to respond here). user:J aka justen (talk) 05:28, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind leaving you a message at all. I was a little pissy after the repeated accusations and although I was seeking resolution it was not the most polite of messages. Hopefully, you won't see anything form me in your email or talk page!Cptnono (talk) 05:32, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As an aside, it looks like you have a unanimous consensus, I do believe, for the proposed text. Would you like to do the honours of reincluding the content? user:J aka justen (talk) 05:37, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
HA! Just did it. Thanks for spearheading this.Cptnono (talk) 05:41, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I did make two small fixes. You should feel free to pare any refs after the rallies blurb that are unnecessary, I just shifted them upwards for right now. Sleep for me now. Thanks, again, for helping improve that article. I really do appreciate it. Take care. user:J aka justen (talk) 05:44, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Get some sleep! I'm going to bring up the refs on the talk page so let me know when you get a chance to review it. This is an aesthetic thing for me mainly and not meant to be contentious.Cptnono (talk) 05:50, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cptnono,

I'm sorry I have to get back to you again, but I am still in the prosess of working on my page. I REALLY would like to finish it! Would you take a look at my sandbox page and would you please tell me, if I am ok to go?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dvornicsek/Sandbox

I only left the 5 photos I have the permission for (1st one is my own work), the rest I'll only post once the permissions arrive.

Thank you,

Dvornicsek (talk) 20:08, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

laszlo marton

Hi Cptnono,

I'm sorry I have to get back to you again, but I am still in the prosess of working on my page. I REALLY would like to finish it! Would you take a look at my sandbox page and would you please tell me, if I am ok to go?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dvornicsek/Sandbox

I only left the 5 photos I have the permission for (1st one is my own work), the rest I'll only post once the permissions arrive.

Thank you, Dvornicsek (talk) 20:09, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cptnono!

I am so tired and dissapointed, I cannot tell you! I see articles on wikipedia, a few sentences all together with hardly any info, and they are good to go. Anyway I did some work again, but I have doubts at this point that I'm ever going to finish. :(

1. I cleared my article, trying to avoid sentences like: "He is known for.." (I left a few, to avoid using Marton all the time. Is that ok?) 2. You'd like to see a "personal life paragraph". I started to do a Biography/Early life and education (as seen in other articles) but I would REALLY like to avoid the personal life, kids and marriage stuff. This man is very personal. His entire life is his work. But I see other directors (Julie Taymor and many more) who keep it just professional, no marriage and kids talk.) Please tell me, this is ok!!! 3."Influences" - what do you mean? 4. "editing and conflicts of interest" - do you think I can EVER finish this? You know how hard i'm trying. :( You say you don't expect there to be a concern if I make some edits to the article. What else do I need to do??? 5. Sourses. I'm sending some links from English language newspapers and a Hungarian encyclopedia. (below) Would you REALLY do the formatting? Wow, thank you! + About: "stacking of images". You say we might format it into a table so keep it all in. HOW do I do that?

sourses: http://www.financialpost.com/scripts/story.html?id=537eb8ab-48d4-4b3a-ac26-147ea66bac2a&k=67333 http://mek.niif.hu/02100/02139/html/sz15/209.html http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/Theatre/article/439345 http://www.nowtoronto.com/stage/story.cfm?content=163514 http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/Theatre/article/251167 http://www.irishtimes.com/events/theatreawards/winners/2003_winners.html http://www.rte.ie/arts/2004/0301/danceintime.html http://www.jsonline.com/entertainment/arts/38834887.html http://www.nytimes.com/1994/10/27/theater/a-budapest-theater-casts-off-its-soviet-past.html?pagewanted=all

Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Dvornicsek (talk) 04:24, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

about photos

Hi Cptnono!

As you suggested, I replied on the following link: "Commons talk:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dvornicsek", and I made it clear which is my photo and which is not, and that permissions are on the way and permissions-commons already contacted me... Is this what you were thinking?

Thank you soooooooooooo much for EVERYTHING! Dvornicsek (talk) 13:47, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cptnono&oldid=310362235"