User talk:SpudHawg948

Re:Columbus Blue Jackets WikiProject

That's Great. Please add you name to the list. The shortcut for the page is WP:BJ. Thanks for your cooperation, 1bevingtonco.

Hello SpudHawg948! I have noticed your frequent activity in articles related to the Columbus Blue Jackets. I have started a WikiProject that focuses on all articles related to the Columbus Blue Jackets. I was wondering if you were interested in joining. If you are, please leave a message on my talk page, so that the Project will be more organized. Thank-you! 1bevingtonco (talk) 01:01, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

SpudHawg948 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

131.50.151.9 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "ProtektYaSelf". The reason given for ProtektYaSelf's block is: "Disruption on waterboarding; likely sockpuppet account of User:Neutral Good".

Blocking administrator: MastCell (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: I am afraid I have blocked this account until further notice, as it seems to be a sockpuppet account of a blocked user. If this is not the case, please explain how it is possible that you use the same IP address as ProtektYaSelf (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). - Mike Rosoft (talk) 14:03, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Your explanation is entirely credible. Please understand that the block was made (by another admin) in good faith due to vandalism and confirmed sockpuppetry by another person on the same IP address as you. I believe your record also speaks for itself. If you are still unable to edit (unlikely), please request an unblock-auto or contact me directly. Note that you may unfortunately occasionally be hit by autoblocks due to vandals at your location.

Request handled by: Yamla (talk) 16:09, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CO2

From Wikipedia:

"According to the best estimates, volcanoes release about 130-230 million tonnes (145-255 million tons) of CO2 into the atmosphere each year"

"Burning fossil fuels such as coal and petroleum is the leading cause of increased anthropogenic CO2; deforestation is the second major cause. As of 2004, around 27 gigatonnes of CO2 are released from fossil fuels per year worldwide,"

Gigatonne = 1,000,000,000

"A 400-page United Nations report from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) states that cattle farming is "responsible for 18% of greenhouse gases."

Somatosis (talk) 09:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Operation COOKIE MONSTER

Talk:Scientific opinion on climate change

No worries - you represented your source correctly, it is just that they did not do the same. - Eldereft (cont.) 23:16, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock still in place, but ip block exemption added (see below) due to this being the second time people have been causing ruckus in a short period of time from your base. --slakr^\ talk / 12:11, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request handled by: slakr^\ talk / 12:11, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

I just want to point out that this is a very high-use IP, as it covers pretty much all internet traffic on DM Air Force Base, so we're talking most likely thousands of people potentially affected. As for me personally, I think my record speaks for itselg. I am an ardent foe of vandalism, and feel I am being unjustly punished for actions outside of my control due to this autoblock. Thanks, SpudHawg948 (talk) 12:00, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you've got a history of good contributions, and unblocking the ip isn't practical given the rampant vandalism over the last couple of days, I've gone ahead and added and ip block exemption for now so that you can get back to editing without worrying about autoblock issues. Cheers =) --slakr^\ talk / 12:10, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, of course not. I definitely think highly of them. One of my high school best friends is graduating from the air force academy, while one of my close current friends is a reservist. With any group of people, of course, there are good ones (the majority) and then there are total idiots. :P --slakr^\ talk / 12:19, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sushi

I think both sides of the argument (and people who aren't even on a side) can end up dealing with silliness simply based off the contentiousness of the subject manner so no worries at all. As far as I am concerned: It has been brought up enough that I hope there is a reliable source out there for inclusion.Cptnono (talk) 10:27, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SpudHawg948. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]