User talk:Nmate

Archives

/Archive 2008
/Archive 2009

.

AN thread

There's an AN thread about you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#User deleting all contributions of other users. lifebaka++ 16:58, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't just claim that I and User:Oficeri are some MarkBA. Don't revert all our contributions without any proof of your claim. You should use WP:SPI. If you say something, prove it. How would you feel if I deleted your contributions and said you are MarkBA? Modrajedobra (talk) 18:17, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Banská Bystrica. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jeni ^(talk)_(Jenuk1985) 18:38, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet Accussations

Hello. Can you please stop with deleting the contributions of all editors who happen to come from a particular IP range. You have no evidence that they are the same person other than the IP range (which covered a large geographic area, not fixed to just one person.) In future if you suspect a sockpuppet please report them to WP:SPI, as your mass deletions are of a disruptive nature. You must assume good faith until sockpuppetry is proven, as not everyone who edits on those articles is a sockpuppet. Looking through your own edits it could be argued you could be one as pretty much all your edits are doing is undoing other people's edits, though I shall also assume good faith. Canterbury Tail talk 10:48, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aplication to undelete my post in the discussion about bratislava.

Hello.

I have no Idea, why you delete my post in discussion about bratislava. But probably it was done because you considered my Ip address as proxy. If you validate my IP as proxy IP, that is wrong. It is not even dynamic Ip Address. If administrator of such site can not find out which IP address is dynamic, which is static, or what is Proxy, that is for crying.

I am working as abuse crew leader of one international site and I work with IP addresses a lot. I never saw such example of amateur and not competent work as in this case.

If there is some other argument for deleting my message, please be so kind and let me know. You will not have hard work to find a post, about which I am talking about according to fact, that it was just my second post on wikipedia.

Good luck and thanks in advance.

Juraj Oniščenko alias jurajda. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.173.80.176 (talk) 21:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

First of all, thank you for your reply and saying the reason of deletation my post. The reason was: "I deleted your comment out of the talk page of Pozsony/Bratislava for you intend to getting involved with provoking the Hungarians instead of you would have made some costructive or at least good faith edits there, helping to improve the article."

I found your reason as not sufficient. 1. That "talk page" is not about Pozsony/Bratislava, it is about Bratislava, if you want to make a talk page about Pozsony, please feel free and make a new article. 2. Sorry, if you understood my post, and If you deleted it, you should know what you deleted, that whole was just about one thing: That whole problem should be judged by native english speaker, not by hungarian or slovak citizens. Certainly, be sure, that I was not writing that for one hungarian, who will delete that... 3. Ad constructivity: As I mentioned on second point, that article will be much more improoved, if there will be usage of official english name of the town. Not Celtic, Slavonic, Hungarian, German, Turkish, French, Slovak. I think, that is enough understable for Slovakian and Hungarian either. I am sure, that this was clear in my article.

Look, my dear rude administrator/moderator, my father spoke hungarian language as native speaker, I am teaching hungarian students on slovakian university whose slovakian language is far worse than my english, I was working 3 years under hungarian bosses who were far better than slovak one, and you are starting to say me, that I am provoking hungarians. If I am against something, that is not hungarians, but nationalistic sentiments. I will laugh on this and it should be showed, if it is on slovakian side, or hungarian side.

Those discussions, articles about jobbik, representatives of jobbik, černova tragedy, Bratislava, Komarno/Komarom, Hedviga Malinova, showed to me what kind of people are doing wikipedia and what level of reliability this whole project has. Censorship, power, intolerance, prejudice, interests of some groups are far more present than values as truth and knowledge.

My post certainly was not for deletation and you made wrong step, for which wikipedia should be ashamed of.

Good Luck.

jurajda —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.173.80.176 (talk) 11:53, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Slovak dialect

It is really not a very important matter, but I do't think it is needed to write necessarily Upper Hungary or Feldvídek there. There was/is no Upper Hungary or Feldvídek language, but Slovak language existed even before the codification of Bernolák and before constituting Czechoslovakia.--Pelex (talk) 12:51, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bratislava

Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you.

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bratislava, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wladthemlat (talk • contribs) 12:01, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please cease the disruptive reverting? The name is properly referenced, it should not be removed. Also, could you quit reversions of János Aczél as they are in violation of WP:NCGN. wlad 13:08, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Micronation, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 20:29, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Bratislava. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 19:53, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

János Aczél

Could you please engage in a proper discussion instead of mindless reversions? I have made a comment on the Talk:János Aczél you are very welcome to reply. wlad 10:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Your last edit summary at Hungary [1] reading In any case Wladthemlat has been reverted can be considered a personal attack under WP:PA, please avoid such behaviour in the future. Wladthemlat (talk) 13:32, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]