Jump to content

User talk:Kinu/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:Kinu

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Charlie1234567899 (talk | contribs) at 18:33, 13 September 2009 (→‎why delete charlotte mickleburgh?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.


New Article
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

I created a new article I want you to look at it and tell me how to make it better please. Here is the link Temple Christian School. Parker1297 (talk) 17:33, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

GLLP
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

I would respectfully suggest that you retract the CSD removal. GLLP does not have notability - who it is recognized by does not confer notability per "notability not conferred by relationship". There are hundreds, if not thousands, of Grand Lodges in the world. Many of them are recognized by UGLE, and many are not. UGLE does not dictate what any other Grand Lodge can do, so recognition by UGLE confers nothing in the way of notability because the deicision is binding on no other Grand Lodge in the world besides UGLE itself. MSJapan (talk) 03:46, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

  • Hi there... I appreciate your comment. However, the threshold for speedy deletion is an "assertion" of notability, which the article has. Whether the subject is actually notable is another story, one which I cannot (and rightfully should not) determine unilaterally, especially considering my unfamiliarity with the topic. I would recommend using the deletion process to help achieve a consensus as to the notability of the GLLP. If you have any questions or would like any assistance in nominating the article for (non-speedy) deletion, please let me know. Thanks! --Kinu t/c 03:01, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Mark Howard Producer
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

can you please restore the page i was working on for grammy award winning record producer Mark Howard. i understand there was a paragraph that was copied from his myspace page but i am willing to delete it although i have full permission from him to use that. noone gave me a chance to put that in writing and it was deleted straight away. please restore my page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Charliedylan (talk • contribs) 02:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

  • At your request, I have restored the article. However, I have removed the copyrighted content. This is because, well, the only thing that says the content is permitted for use on Wikipedia is your word, which doesn't work and creates all sorts of issues. I recommended adding to the article using neutral, third-party sources to indicate why the subject is notable. --Kinu t/c 02:53, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Stilltim
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

We need certification on the RFC for Stilltim. Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Stilltim Gigs (talk) 04:07, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

  • I've added my endorsement. Thank you for taking it upon yourself to create this. I hope that some sort of consensus is reached in this matter soon! --Kinu t/c 21:24, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Page Was Deleated, for Copyrights.
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Hello,

We put up a article called Montyne, and i got a notice saying it was in copyright infringement. So I did what the notice said and put on the article talk page, That we own all the copyright to the article and thet we have a copy of all the infomation on our web site at www.montyne.com/about. But still our page has been removed and we would like resolve the issue.

Thanks You.

Sterling M. Evans

Tech Support for Montyne Inc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Montyne (talk • contribs) 04:58, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

  • The website in question indicates a copyright. At the moment, the only information we have regarding a copyright release is your word, which cannot be truly verified (after all, anyone could have created a user with the name "Montyne" and claimed to be the owner of the information, right?). In order to release the content for use on Wikipedia, an appropriate entity (webmaster of the aforementioned website, etc.) should peruse Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials and act accordingly; for example, a notice could be posted on the website indicating that the content is released with a GFDL-compatible copyleft notice. This would allow the content to be reused herein. That notwithstanding, I am concerned about the conflict of interest issue here; however, that was not grounds for speedy deletion and would be looked at more closely at a later date. I hope this information helps. --Kinu t/c 03:49, 14 May 2009 (UTC)


Hello,

You told me that if i put a License Tag on the web site, I put "The text of this page is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike." on the page. So can you put the montyne page back up, Or is there some thing els i need to do?

Thank You

Sterling M. Evans

Tech Support for Montyne —Preceding unsigned comment added by Montyne (talk • contribs) 05:11, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

  • I see the GFDL release notice at the site, which removes the copyright issue. However, I still have concerns about the inherent conflict of interest and lack of other sources in the article. You are welcome to recreate the article, but I would be hesitant to simply copy the contents of that page into the article. I would recommend creating a coherent encyclopedic article that is also based on third-party reliable sources. Please also read WP:BIO to determine what characteristics about the individual should be noted to indicate that the article should be included in Wikipedia. Thanks! --Kinu t/c 03:08, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


Ok So if we Rewrite it and Include all of our refaces and I have Checked the WP-BIO and there are a few sections that the individual falls into, And if we resubmitted it there will be no more Deleting?

Thank You!!

Sterling M. Evans —Preceding unsigned comment added by Montyne (talk • contribs) 03:27, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Ted Russell kamp entry deleted??
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Why was the Ted Russell Kamp page I created deleted?

I am Ted's webmaster, and Ted asked me to create the page for him. He supplied the text, and the words he wanted to appear as links.

What happened?

Bermuda Schwartz Bermuda Schwartz Web Design The "Weird Al" Yankovic Band

Bermudaschwartz (talk) 19:04, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

E-lab deleted
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Hi

i wanted to ask why the page on E-lab has been deleted, it was a page explain what the E-lab research group was, similart to for examle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_Analysis_of_Telecommunication_Systems

Regards

Maarten Weyn Maartenweyn (talk) 22:35, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Staff Sergeant Richard S. Eaton_Jr
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Dear Community:

The following entry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Army_Staff_Sergeant_Richard_S._Eaton_Jr) on US Army Counterintelligence Special Agent Richard S. Eaton should not be considered subject to the “speedy deletion” criteria articulated by the Wiki community: 1) There is no copyright violation – all sources are footnoted. 2) There are no inflammatory language, ideas, or thoughts and no redirects. 3) The entry does not advertise a service or group. 4) There is no content forking as this is a factual (verified with press and third party sources) entry. 5) The entry had mainstream, internationally reliable sources including the Associated Press. 6) Verification of sources can be found be investigating the embedded links. 7) The entry meets the relevance standard because of Mr. Eaton’s record of service, his combat related death as it speaks to the increasing strain on US military forces conducting repeat tours – see OPSTEMPO 8) The entry doesn’t breach the policy on living person bios as Mr. Eaton is deceased 9) The entry is not redundant as this is the first mention of Mr. Eaton 10) The entry is not over categorized as I am not even sure I know how to categorize it 11) The images used are all from open source venues with appropriate hyperlinks or from internal Wiki sources 12) The entry does not violate and is not contrary to the established separate policy for that namespace since it didn’t exist before I created it 13) All content on the page is verified, cited, and sourced. In turn, it doesn’t violate content for suitability.

Please let me know if there is anything I can do to further refine and ensure compliance with Wiki standards. I believe this entry is worthy of Wiki and I have added only factual information. Please let me know if you there is anything that needs to be changed.

Regards, Tim


Thank you for your reply. I understand your point. However, from a historical and military history perspective, I think you should be aware that the Richard Eaton is the son of Brigadier General Richard J. Eaton.

“He was twice assigned to the Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He was Brigade Commander in the 3d Infantry Division in Germany and V Corps Chief of Staff. His awards include: Distinguished Service Medal, 3 Silver Stars, 2 Legions of Merit, 2 Distinguished Flying Crosses, Soldiers Medal, 4 Bronze Stars with V, 6 Purple Hearts, 5 Air Medals, 2 Army Commendation Medals with V, and numerous other U.S. and foreign awards. He holds 3 Combat Infantry Badges, Master Parachute Badge with Combat Jump Star, 13 Bronze Stars (campaigns), and Bronze Arrowhead (invasion). Brigadier General Richard J. Eaton is a true Patriot. Throughout his entire career, Ranger Eaton Led the Way by his personal example.” Source: https://www.benning.army.mil/rtb/Hall_of_Fame/HallofFame6/brigadier_general_eaton.htm

As such the historical parallel makes the entry pertinent to the study of both history and military history.

Best, Tim

TC1234 8923 (talk) 02:41, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Staff Sergeant Richard S. EatonJr

Kinu:

I continue to act in good faith but you have failed to respond to me. I notice you have recently added the following to the page in question –“G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page: Accidental recreation while tagging”.

What am I to make of this development?

Best, Tim

TC1234 8923 (talk) 04:52, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

  • Hm... it looks like my response to your original comment never committed. My apologies. Anyway... as for the article in question, please note that Wikipedia is not a memorial, and the article read like an obituary. Likewise, there was no indication that the subject of the article met any of Wikipedia's notability guideline. Being a member of the military who is killed in action is not an assertion of notability; please see WP:BIO for what would constitute one. I stand by my speedy deletion, and ndeed, the second time the article was posted, it was speedily deleted by another administrator for the same reason, and I endorse that as well. (By the way, the G7 deletion that you mention above was because another editor accidentally recreated the article with just a deletion template after it had been deleted the second time... a housekeeping action and not related to the content you posted.) --Kinu t/c 05:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

1) Fan Site: This terminology is used to “imply that a selection of content is of importance only to a small population of enthusiastic”. The entry in question does not meet this criterion in the least. This entry is intended to serve as an example of the consequences and implications of a stressed military. Please refer to the US Department of Defense for clarification on OPTEMPO: http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=42131 or the Wiki post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Bragg,_North_Carolina 2) Peacock Terms: This term references “an article without imparting real information”. This is neither accurate of fair. The entry in question specifically addressed Mr. Eaton’s death while serving in the military. Given the immediate nature of the designation for “speedy deletion”, the authors were unable to build out the page to include extenuating and exacerbating issues of magnitude. Additional time for the pages construction should warrant the development of its informational content. In addition, the definition of “peacock” includes the inclusion of “unqualified opinion”. There is no basis for this claim. The entry references the Associated Press and countless other internationally renowned media outlets (please note all sentences in the entry are cited). The US Department of Defense, the US Army, the 323 Military Intelligence Battalion of the US Army, the Governor of the State of Connecticut, the Attorney General of the State of Connecticut, two Connecticut State Senators and numerous Connecticut State Representatives have lent their names, opinions, and representations to the comments they expressed publicly. Assertions that these and other active military personal qualify as somehow being “unqualified” seems less then sincere. 3) Personal Essay: The entry in question is fact based and includes citations for more than 90% of the sentences. To claim that there is “editorial license” is not only inaccurate it is not true. Please see the entry as you will no doubt agree it is aggressively cited. 4) Confusing or Unclear: The entry in question is sourced by unbiased, independent, 3rd party sources. The claim the entry is either confusing or unclear doesn’t stand to reason. 5) Links to Other Articles: The entry has a source for 90% of the sentences. It is inconceivable a claim that the entry is undocumented has merit. 6) Copy Editing: The entry has no spelling, grammar, or syntax errors. Please review as this objection fails to hold water. 7) Wikified: This entry complies in both the letter and spirit of Wiki’s quality standards. Please feel free to point out any deficiencies. 8) Cleanup: Again, this entry is gramatically, spelling, and syntax compliant. It follows quality standards in terms of content and narrative voice to the letter of law. 9) Based on the historical and military historical relevance of Mr. Eaton and Mr. Eaton’ father there is clearly a strong and compelling basis for inclusion.

Please let me know if you have any comments or suggestions.

Best, Tim TC1234 8923 (talk) 05:06, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

  • I'm not certain what you're quoting/responding to here... but the relevant link here is WP:BIO, which outlines the notability guidelines for individuals. I'm not certain what else I can say on this matter. A first step for an article would be to make that assertion of notability, and as I did not see anything indicating an assertion in that regard, I endorsed the speedy deletion. (Also, there is no need to create a new section each time you post here; please post below my responses to keep the comments threaded. Thanks.) --Kinu t/c 05:16, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Kinu:

I realize Wikipedia is not a memorial but please, sir, be cognizant of your audience when speaking so bluntly on such an acutely impactful subject matter. Sensitivity and respect would be appreciated whether or not you agree with the entry or cause.

To your point, how can the entry be reformatted to better fit Wiki requirements?

Best, Tim —Preceding unsigned comment added by TC1234 8923 (talk • contribs) 05:30, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

  • The key would be to review the notability guidelines mentioned at WP:BIO indicating why the subject is notable. To that end, I certainly hope you don't take my objective assessment of the article as insensitivity... however, that is sometimes necessary when working within the consensus of what constitutes "notability" in the scope of this encyclopedia, and being killed in action is, I'm afraid, not that threshold. However, if and only if that assertion can be made, then making sure that everything is properly referenced and rewriting the article to sound more encyclopedic would be necessary. --Kinu t/c 00:45, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Virtu-Market
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Hi i added a page re: Virtu-Market, it is a new phrase i invented, how do I get it accepted on wikipedia. There are no references as it is a new term.

--Salmon1960 (talk) 04:27, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Epic Bail page
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Hi my Epic Bail indoor cricket team was deleted. The atricle was created by me for my fellow team mates so they can view the teams performance ect during the year and wikipedia is the only site we have access to at work. Can this please be re created as it is not a joke.

It is not about hosting it is an legitimate article that I created to provide not only my work mates but also other players about the team, it is for information reasons... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tja2287 (talk • contribs) 04:43, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

  • This is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. In order for something to have an article on Wikipedia, it must be WP:N. I'm afraid that your indoor cricket team is not considered a notable sports organization. I hope this helps. --Kinu t/c 04:46, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

so there is no way we can actually have this on there when 300+ work colleagues would have been sent this article to view? Please also note this team is a registered team of the ICA (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indoor_Cricket_Australia) and feel as such the team should be able to post results from a nationally recognized organisation —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tja2287 (talk • contribs) 04:50, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

  • I'm afraid not... sorry. I would consider using another webhost. And the organization you mention does not have an article of its own; perhaps if it did then a mention (or more) may be appropriate, but in that case the purpose would be to post relevant, sourced information and not be a space for members of the team to interact with one another, post results, etc. --Kinu t/c 05:03, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


It does indeed have an article of its own I gave you a link to it I have given you the Indoor Cricket Australia link. I am more than happy to menion this in my article as I did not previously and provide a link to the wiki Indoor Cricket Australia page on there also??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tja2287 (talk • contribs) 05:07, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

  • The link you provided redirects to the general article on Indoor cricket. The Australian body does not have an article of its own. That notwithstanding, please read the concerns I have mentioned above about the article you wish to create. (Also, there is no need to create a new section each time you post here; please post below my responses to keep the comments threaded. Thanks.) --Kinu t/c 05:12, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

If United States Champion Jockey by wins is an "R3: Recently-created, implausible redirect" then why do so many thing link to it? --Carlaude talk 13:05, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

  • Apparently the article is meant to exist about this topic, but for whatever reason it has never existed. It was then created recently as a link to Eclipse Award for Outstanding Jockey, which is unrelated and was therefore tagged for deletion. Indeed, commentary with the deletion notice said this was a "[r]edirect but to wrong article. If and when created, this would be a stand-alone article." --Kinu t/c 00:32, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
vandalism and sockpuppetry
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Hey Kinu, I see you're busy--just to add to it, could you have a look at Donald E. Williams, Jr.? There's a series of edits removing sourced content, containing some negative notes on the subject. Moreover, I think there's an editor with a dual identity at work there, as the history will show soon enough. Nice doggie, BTW! Thanks, Drmies (talk) 04:27, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

  • No problem... thanks for letting me know. I've temporarily protected the article while I investigate. I'll let you know what arises from my sleuthing. :P --Kinu t/c 04:30, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
  • I've gone ahead and blocked both users for sockpuppetry/meatpuppetry. It looks pretty blatant based on the fact that these edits are their only contributions and one of the accounts was created today, apparently specifically for this purpose. I figure I'll lift the protection and see what happens... --Kinu t/c 04:37, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Would you be interested in joining this project? We need more editors who share a burden for rescuing promising editors who have gotten into serious trouble because of behavioral issues. IF (a fundamental condition!) they are interested in reforming and adapting to our standards of conduct, and are also willing to abide by our policies and guidelines, rather than constantly subverting them, we can offer to help them return to Wikipedia as constructive editors. Right now many if not most users who have been banned are still active here, but they are here as socks or anonymous IPs who may or may not be constructive. We should offer them a proper way to return. If you think this is a good idea, please join us. Abce2|AccessDenied 04:32, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi -- can you tell me what you are up to
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Just wondering if you can give me an explanation of how you happened to delete the article on Consult and Liaison Psychiatry.

--InnocentsAbroad2 (talk) 05:20, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


The article "Psychosomatic medicine" doesn't exist ? --InnocentsAbroad2 (talk) 06:29, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

  • It does.... but notice the different capitalization. I figure you meant to create the article as a redirect to the existent one, which makes sense now. --Kinu t/c 12:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
I don't wanna
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

I don't wanna. It's fun. Appleton 01:00, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Bristol Apache deletion
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Hi I was just wondering why the Bristol Apache page was deleted? The history and importance of the club to Bristol was added to the page was it because it wans't in depth enough? Other English American Football teams have been allowed that are new. Please can you tell me in depth what wwas wrong with the page so I can improve it. KalemLyco (talk) 15:11, 20 June 2009 (UTC)


OK So once the application for league affiliation is complete (hopefully the next couple of days) would I be able to recreate the page without it being deleted again? —Preceding unsigned comment added by KalemLyco (talk • contribs) 21:21, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

At this specific moment in time other than a Facebook group no and I'm aware that, that doesn't count as a reliable source. Until the league application is confirmed and we appear on their website I don't think there will be. I'll hang fire then until The application goes through, we appear on the BAFL website and we gain more sources. KalemLyco (talk) 23:37, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

The New Sneaks (band) request
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

I have no idea how to start a page for a band and I realized that I couldn't start one for my own (sort of a stupid rule? I suppose if I could furnish the sources for it, etc., then that would be legitimate wouldn't it?) - - No, not trying to trouble you, just, how would I get a request submitted for a page on The New Sneaks, a band, (arguably mine) that might be explained by the Wikipedia database? I'm sure there's a way.

Deletion of Instinctive Computing
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Hey Kinu, I understand that there are lots of rules etc regarding 'speedy deletions' and all wiki users recognize the need to prevent it from becoming too cluttered too quickly. The article which was deleted was only entered yesterday. The person who wrote it was Prof Yang Cai (Carnegie Mellon CyLab senior scientist)who only the week before had hosted an Instinctive Computing workshop here at CMU. Because of certain wiki latency issues the rest of his lab team was unable to upload additional details and links to ongoing research in this area. The workshop featured very senior research scientists from around the world including Prof. Kevin Warwick (Reading University Department Head and featured cover on Wired Magazine), Michael Leyton (Rutgers University Math Department Head), David Farber (CMU Emeritus CS Professor) and many others.

So we are wiki-newbies, we know that. Some grad student is going to have to learn the rules. But we just wanted to get the article going so it could be filled out over a few days. That was why what was posted seemed so incomplete. It was. But before we could commence work on improving it you deleted it. Can we have some sort of indulgence here?

  • The versions of the article that have been deleted were copied verbatim from the chapter published by Prof. Yang Cai. This constitutes a copyright infringement, which is disallowed on Wikipedia. If an encyclopedic article can be written using reliable sources (i.e., the professor's paper, among others) indicating why the topic of instinctive computing is notable in its field, then the article will have a more greater chance of remaining in the encyclopedia. I hope this information helps. --Kinu t/c 20:53, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
About the deleted page "Tejari"
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

I wanted to create a new article with the title "Tejari", but I could not because the page was created already and now it is deleted by you and protected since May 2008. It is really important to use this title specifically because it really describe my topic, I would really appreciate if you can help me to unprotect it so I will be able to create it again.

Many thanks in advance for your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tejari2009 (talk • contribs) 07:19, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Based on the deletion log, this article has appeared to have existed only as copyright violations and/or spam. What content do you intend to place in the article? Based on your username, I fear a possible conflict of interest. Any information would be helpful. --Kinu t/c 20:39, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


Hi Kinu, I'll put information about the companies history sisnce it's inception. I will also, provide some information about it's business model and revenu model. No marketing content will be included at all, the entire article will be objective with real fact-based information.--Tejari2009 (talk) 10:03, 2 July 2009 (UTC)


Hi again, I noticed that my username might have caused some troubles, I have changed it as per Wikipedia's suggestion, I think it is now more Wiki-friendly. If you are still concerned about what I would post on this article, I can share it with you before posting it. What do you think? This is my first time I use Wikipedia for editing articles and I'm trying to get mysilf familiar with all the rules. Thank you --MJaradat77 (talk) 05:08, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Hi there. Sorry for the delay in responding, but I have been busy in real life and haven't had much time for Wikipedia. Would you be willing to create a draft article in your user space, such as at User:MJaradat77/Tejari? While I will assume that you have the best intentions, I am still somewhat hesitant to remove the protection without some idea of what the article will contain. Thanks. --Kinu t/c 02:34, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

why delete Larry Wood?

He is significant in the car industry and linked to from other pages, which are now all showing up as deleted entries by some kinu joker. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.49.209.157 (talk) 19:04, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michaëll

Thanks for handling this. Once I realized it was a hoax I should have just closed it myself and deleted the three articles. I'm tired and I dithered about whether it would look bad for me to close my own AfD no matter how clear it was that it was a G3 speedy. So I punted and left it for someone else. Thanks again. Holler if I can help you on something. Cheers, Pigman☿/talk 05:30, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

zeekiology

excuse me, why did u delete that page, its not a hoax. our hall of zeekiology has more than 25 followers and it continues to grow everday and we have strong belifes in our faith. so why delete a perfectly legimate page?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeekio.shyam (talk • contribs) 05:45, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

hey i've heard of zeekiology apparently it was founded 4000 years ago in asia, if the guy who created the page created zeekiology i'd let him have the page for being so old!


well in that sense isn't even Scientology something that is created??? how comes thats recognized and not our religion.. we have been writing the book of zeekiology for almost 1 yr now and its near its completion., hence i really dont see the problem here... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeekio.shyam (talk • contribs) 05:55, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from Days and Months in Song

Hello Kinu, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Days and Months in Song has been removed. It was removed by Charles Matthews with the following edit summary '(rm deletion tagging)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Charles Matthews before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:53, 9 September 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

Please Do Not Delete Tribe of Fools or Armageddon at the Mushroom Village!!

Armageddon at the Mushroom Village is a production of Tribe of Fools. It is now showing at the 2009 Philadelphia Live Arts Festival and Philly Fringe. Tribe of Fools is a local Philadelphia theater troupe that is bring theater to a new generation. Tribe of Fools is also a 501 (c) (3) Non-Profit organization.

71.175.68.147 (talk) 07:04, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

  • None of the above addresses the concern about notability as derived from reliable sources. I see a few local newspaper mentions, but nothing substantial. I do respect your opinion and will ask for community consensus at WP:AFD. --Kinu t/c 19:13, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
    • I am sorry 71.175.68.147. I tried. I hope this doesn't stop you from editing again. Message me PLEASE after the discussion, and I will teach you how to userfy the page.Ikip (talk) 03:55, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Armageddon_at_the_mushroom_village

Would you considering userfying the articles which you put up for deletion? The will remove it from mainspace completely. The editor is a new editor, and this will give the new user a chance to rework the article and maybe wikipedia will get a new dedicated editor. Please let me know as soon as possible, because as soon as someone else comments on the AfD, they must agree also before I can userfy the article. Thanks for your time.Ikip (talk) 00:39, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

  • Usually, I have no objection to userficiation, provided the creator understands both the rationale behind the original deletion nomination and what would be necessary to bring the articles up to par in terms of the relevant guidelines involved. (I see someone else has commented in the interim, but it is possible that they might agree to this as well.) Thanks for your suggestion. --Kinu t/c 03:40, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
    • We were to late, I guess the article discussion will have to go the full 7 days, enjoy the discussion :) I appreciate your response. Best wishes in editing. Hope we run into each other again someday. Ikip (talk) 03:54, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Uberpedia

I was actually the admin who went ahead and endorsed the speedy. There's really nothing I saw in terms of a reference to establish any notability, other than "it exists"... it looks like just another fork (it's actually listed at Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks). Just wanted to clarify what I did there. :D --Kinu t/c 08:13, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. I appreciate the information. --UnicornTapestry (talk) 08:25, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

why delete charlotte mickleburgh?

looking at your page you seem to delete pages about things/people you've never heard of. Charlotte Mickleburgh is BRITISH and I created the page well, because she's a person. Known by a lot of people, has her own CD, AND there's a lot of people i've never heard of on Wikipedia pages. I created it to inform people about her and how great she is. There's pages about over 3 billion things on wikipedia. Charlotte is a real person, like you (hopefully). There's a page YOU so why can't there be a page about her? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlie1234567899 (talk • contribs) 18:26, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

  • According to the versions of the article I have deleted, she's ostensibly a nine-year-old who self-produced a CD. The article violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy and contains no information about why the subject is notable. Yes, there are articles about people I haven't heard of, but all those meet notability guidelines and contain reliable sources to establish that notability. Also, there is no article about, it is my user page. I hope this information answers your questions. Thank you. --Kinu t/c 18:30, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

yeh, thanks um maybe you should go on this website - it talks about her being in a production of GANG SHOW - is that proof? http://todmordengangshow.wordpress.com/

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kinu/Archive_7&oldid=313617317"