Jump to content

User talk:DarkFalls

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Panoptical (talk | contribs) at 17:16, 5 November 2009 (→Amanda Logan). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

DarkFalls

Contribs —— Home —— Talk —— Email —— Identity —— To Do —— DYK

Wikimedia Commons —— Meta-Wiki —— Wikipedia —— Wikisource —— Wikiquote —— Wiktionary


 DarkFalls' Talk Page

Welcome to DarkFalls' talk page. Please keep civil and sign your comments.

IP Vandalism

I've raised the issue of the IP vandalism to your and another editor's talk page at WP:ANI#IP Vandalism. Not sure exactly what is going on, but think it needs to be raised so that other more experienced admins can take a look. Mjroots (talk) 09:35, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Needn't have bothered. It's Mr. Hanson, aka Grawp, HAGGER and a few others. Wikipedia:Long term abuse/JarlaxleArtemis. No sense wasting more time on this than necessary. —Dark 09:40, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please semi-protect your talk page

I noticed in the revision history that all those IP addresses keep blanking your talk page and each time people had to rollback those edits. Please semi-protect it.  Merlion  444  09:52, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've semi-protected it. If DarkFalls unprotects it that's his decision and I'll not revert him. Mjroots (talk) 09:58, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

I judge from your obscenity that you "declined the speedy" on Feisty Studios? I have prodded the article for deletion; there appear to be no reliable references that establish the company's notability or even the basic facts as they are stated in the article. This Google search proved conclusive to me. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:51, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That was hardly an obscenity. I was bewildered how Irbisgreif decided to revert 15 edits as vandalism, when it was obvious that they were addition of content and references. And the edit summary stating the edits were "vandalism" is just.. off-putting. That being said, I have no objections to the prodding of the article, although it's obvious the article did not meet the criteria for speedy deletion. —Dark 06:03, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009

Did I forget to thank you? ..

DarkFalls ,Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed nearly unanimously with 174 in support, 2 in opposition and 1 neutral votes. Special thanks goes to RegentsPark, Samir and John Carter for their kind nomination and support. I am truly honored by the trust and confidence that the community has placed in me. I thank you for your kind inputs and I will be sincerely looking at the reasons that people opposed me so I can improve in those areas ( including my english ;) ). If you ever need anything please feel free to ask me and I would be happy to help you :). Have a great day ! -- Tinu Cherian - 06:02, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009

IP 203.76.185.18

Please do not re-instate edits by user 203.76.185.18, who is a proven IP sock of an indefinitely blocked sock of an indefinitely-blocked sock of an indefinitely-blocked master.

  • See here for a list of socks and
  • here for the sock investigation and CheckUser outcome.

Thanks, Jasepl (talk) 10:50, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did not reinstate the edit. I reverted my rollback of the IP address' revision, as I was uncertain as to whether the IP's edit were in fact, vandalism. —Dark 06:07, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
yes, some AFDs can be pretty silly YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 06:08, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
*scratches head in confusion* —Dark 06:10, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Logan

I'm confused as to the reason you declined the speedy deletion nomination, and then suggest that I send it to AfD or Prod. It was appropriately tagged ({{db-person}}) as she is a real person and the article, in my opinion, does not emphasize the importance or notability of her. Even a quick Google search did not reveal any credible sources besides her blog and radio website, which are not 3rd-party sources. Panoptical (talk) 17:16, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DarkFalls&oldid=324111921"