Jump to content

User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 41

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:NawlinWiki

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dikkitydex (talk | contribs) at 20:01, 13 December 2009 (→‎hatcher murphy disorder: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jesse Stretch Article Question

I am somewhat new to Wikipedia and left you a comment on the Jesse Stretch page. Please let me know if you are able to access this comment and if it makes sense to you. I will cut and paste it here just in case (see below)-

Besides being an author, Jesse Stretch (and his book) is the catalyst for the founding of a ministry which has made incredible strides in the Virginia prison community. This ministry is called Desperate Highway Ministries and was founded by pastor Wayne Watkins earlier in 2009. I believe I cited the ministry's website in the Jesse Stretch article. The reason for Stretch's inclusion in Wikipedia has more to do with forming a complete picture of a book which has sold thousands of copies and changed the lives of countless prisoners. It is a self-published book, sure, but it's actually very well rated by purchasers and has outsold (and outranked) many major publications (I do have information to substantiate these claims). Someone should probably do an entry on the ministry which sprung up as a result of his book. I do not know if I have sufficient contact ability to write such an article, but I will try to make something happen in the next couple weeks to satisfy this group's needs MitchBauserman (talk) 17:42, 13 December 2009 (UTC) Mitch Bauserman

Thanks for your time and attention. Talk soon, MitchBauserman (talk) 17:52, 13 December 2009 (UTC) Mitch Bauserman[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jesse_Stretch"


United Protection Officers of America

ok so the deletion of my page july 7 2009 did not happen try reading things before asserting false statements as facts. in fact three seperate wiki administrators, have singled me out , you not a credible source is what you are telling me i with and ask you delete me based on your administrators obvious bias. hurry up and erase this too, like you di my last message. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seattlecityunion (talk • contribs) 19:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


im sorry are you saying that the federal government is not a reliable second source? now what exactly is (and im taking into account here you are from a HEAVILY ANTI-UNION STATE , bias anyone?) reasoning for the federal governament to not be a vaild secondary source?Ill have to make shure the folks at region 19 are aware of this.

your non answer to my first question did not impress me , and if you think I can t read around 3rd grade dodges like that are going to was , im falling over laughing.

So on my own I founded the united protection officers of america ( N.ational L.abor R.elations B.oard case 19-VR-053) this you may or may not realize is in fact the feds.

So I pose this question:

how do you figure , kicking the worlds largest union square in the nuts , taking a political centerpiece from said union's grasp, and ultimatley intefering with the plans of the mayor of the 15th largest city in the united states is unimportant?

I eagerly await your reply. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seattlecityunion (talk • contribs) 04:22, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page watcher here, and the guy who nominated the article for speedy deletion the second time around. This isn't even a question of sources. You've neglected to establish the notability of the organization, referenced or otherwise. The union you describe appears to be small and localized; we don't put up articles on every local branch of the plumber's union either, even if they are recognized by NLRB. If this is an incorrect assessment, explain the reasons for the notability of this organization, per WP:ORG. Making personal attacks (claiming this is about anti-union bias in Louisiana) is pointless; we assume good faith here, and I've seen nothing to indicate a political tendency of any form in Nawlin's edits.
Oh, and for the record, I'm a pro-union New Yorker, recently of Seattle. Of course, this bias doesn't affect my edits (this is the first time unions has ever come up actually); a notable union gets an article, a non-notable one doesn't, simple as that. —ShadowRanger (talk|stalk) 17:58, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
sorry but we need to kkep going on this i need to now know why you in fact single me out , nemsa has no information in thier space on "list of trade unions , but no call by you to remove them, the same could be said for SPFPA whos article area is empty and clearly is grounds for A7.
oh and to be straight forward I am still not certain you understand what the word "list means" , after reviewing it in the dictionary all of your points pertaining to it are clearly invaild.
so here is the thing I demand the removal of all blank page articles on "list of trade unions" at once ,and argue in certainty that all of your pervious arguments apply to them
wanna play? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seattlecityunion (talk • contribs) 19:28, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You weren't singled out, you were noticed on new page patrol (at least, that's how I noticed it). When we identify a new page that qualifies for speedy deletion, we nominate it, but we don't go through every conceivably related article with similar problems to nominate them. Either the other articles slipped by, or they asserted notability that you did not, that's all. Don't take it personally. The bar for being mentioned in a zero detail list is probably a bit lower, so I don't particularly care about NEMSA being listed there, but reasonable people could easily differ. This was never about the list page though; we've only speedied the article specific to your union; we haven't removed them from the list of unions at all, so you're in the exact same position as NEMSA.
Since the blank page articles on the list are in the same position as you, I'm not sure what you're complaining about.
Sidenote: I'm heading out of town for the weekend, and I don't think there is much else to discuss that NawlinWiki or myself has not explained. I won't be responding until next Monday at the earliest. —ShadowRanger (talk|stalk) 19:44, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm… Looks like he just got blocked by OrangeMike, so my absence is meaningless. Nawlin: Apologies if I accidentally stirred him up. I try to be as even keeled as possible, but for some people that seems to set them off. Enjoy your weekend! —ShadowRanger (talk|stalk) 19:55, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yizhao Lang

I WANT TO READ THE ARCTICLE about he real person "Yizhao Lang"!!! HE/SHE IS IMPORTANT because he is IN THE BANNER ON THE TOP of WIKIPEDIA !!!!

NawlinWiki deleted the Article.. I WANT TO READ THAT !! Why do you delete important informations???

(Sorry that I write here, but I dont know where else...) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.173.199.126 (talk) 19:58, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

Saturn semi-protection

Hi, it looks like you semi-protected the page Saturn on 17 May 2008. It is still semi-protected, perhaps it is time to open it up again? Regards Thehalfone (talk) 16:29, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Side Hug

I'm not entirely sure on how it should be handled. It's an article about a blatant and obvious hoax that leads off by describing the practice as if it exists. Not sure where I should draw the line... —ShadowRanger (talk|stalk) 18:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a friendly heads up on Christian Side Hug. The article creator has placed a {{hangon}} tag twice on the article. I'm interpreting this to be an attempt to contest the prod, so I've removed the prod and prod-2 tags. No objection if you kick this on to AfD. Cheers!--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:23, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My Sandbox

Thanks for your feedback. I made additional edits that i think better illustrate the significance of my entry. Let me know what you think and if it still runs a risk of deletion.

sandboxMichellecatin (talk) 20:06, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

St.James

Hi there! I am the artist St. James, and I'm not selling a product or service. I am a newsworthy subject who has been active and relevant on the international music scene for the last 20 yrs. I'd like a good explanation for the deletion of my article, but would also be happy to simply walk away from all this.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Loongfellow (talk • contribs)

Moved from /Archive 40. --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 23:27, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The "product or service" you're selling is yourself - the article was entirely promotional, with language like "The absolutely hottest house act from Sweden today. St.James achievements read as a veritable who's who in the history of border-breaking swedish house music... St.James is currently applying finishing touches to a MONUMENTAL album." Please read WP:SPAM. Also, you shouldn't be writing about yourself - see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:16, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Safecor Health

Listen, I am trying to create a page, and make it unbiased. I was using the websites entries for information and already made some changes and want to continue to do so. Please undelete my article so i can make fixes to make it neutral. Also I am a temporary employee here, so i do not have a conflict of interest.--Smnioffe (talk) 16:25, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am writing this in an unbiased way. Just give me a chance.--Smnioffe (talk) 16:29, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, you seem like a fair person. Thats all I ask.--Smnioffe (talk) 16:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, can you help me move the info I had into my workspace. Thanks!--Smnioffe (talk) 16:34, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!--Smnioffe (talk) 16:37, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Du Cane, the elder

Hi! Can you tell me where in that article notability is asserted? Thanks, --SquidSK (1MC•log) 17:04, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Voltaire

I apologize if I stepped on your toes. I'm about 10 minutes into learning Huggle. --King Öomie 20:24, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's like the program gives you extremely powerful tools, but reduces you to tunnel vision. Sometimes it's hard to tell which diff the vandalism started in :P If there were some way to enable Popups to function inside of it...

There Will Be Brawl Deletion

I know it's been a while since you did so, but I was curious as to why you chose to delete this article. Thank you. I38VWI (talk) 23:57, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nasty image deletion

Thanks for your assist in deleting the rather tasteless image [File:Forwiki.jpg], as noted on the deletion log:

  1. (Deletion log); 16:02 . . NawlinWiki (talk | contribs) deleted "File:Forwiki.jpg" (G3: Vandalism)

However when I checked the article edit summary link a few minutes ago to verify, the image was still on WP's server. Does it take a certain amount of time to purge out, or does the image file have to be deleted separately from the edit summary logs? Also, do you know what procedure would be involved in having the vandal reported to ISP involved? Thanks.... HarryZilber (talk) 17:25, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are there provisions within WP for doing a followup to this ex-account holder's ISP? (whether or not the image falls into the legal definition of 'obscene material') HarryZilber (talk) 17:31, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wylde Bunch

why did you delete this article. i demand you restart it. they are an amazing band, and i can't start it because you made it so i cant get any information i need. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benihana04 (talk • contribs) 04:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ajax (programming)

hi NawlinWiki, I just happened upon Ajax (programming) yesterday and I noticed that you indef move protected it more a year and a half ago. The reason given in the log isn't very helpful in explaining the need for protection, so I figured that I would bring the issue up. I don't plan on moving it, and I don't think that it should be moved, but... I don't see why it needs to be protected, is all.
— V = I * R (talk to Ω) 11:58, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • At the time, we were having issues with vandal pagemoves of highly visible pages. That has been pretty much taken care of by the edit filter. Let me know if you want me to remove the moveprotection, and I'll give it a try. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:51, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    It's up to you really. I'm not watching the page, and I don't plan on doing so, I just found the move protection to be a curious irregularity so I started asking about it. It is probably worth noting that the page does have a somewhat significant number of watchers however, and it seems from the talk page that many of them are still active. That being the case, I wouldn't think that protection would be particularly needed (barring an extraordinary increase in vandalism, for whatever reason). Obviously though, there's no need to go shouting to everyone that the page is now unprotected, of course. ;)
    — V = I * R (talk to Ω) 13:16, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of DPReview.com

Excuse me, but you deleted the redirect page DPReview.com. Could you please explain why? Now any links to it will say "this article no longer exists" and people will assume that there is no article about it. Please write back. --The High Fin Sperm Whale (Talk · Contribs) 19:43, 7 December 2009 (UTC) [reply]

I would have restored it myself, but I wasn't exactly sure why it was deleted. Thanks. --The High Fin Sperm Whale (Talk · Contribs) 21:56, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Urgent request

Hi Nawlin. I saw you're active right now, so I was hoping you could block Special:Contributions/J.d Seraphim Timmeh indefinitely as a sockpuppet of indefinitely banned user AFI-PUNK. See the contribs of Special:Contributions/La Musica De AFI (another sockpuppet) for evidence. I'd bring this up at a noticeboard, but usually J.delanoy blocks these socks and he's not editing right now; and the sockpuppet is vandalizing right now. J.delanoy can explain this in more detail later if you need a better explanation. Thanks. Timmeh 21:45, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, he's been blocked. Thanks anyway. Timmeh 21:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted "They Must Be Russians"

Hi Nawlin, i was looking for "They Must Be Russians" article and sadly found it deleted just a few days before. In my opinion they are an important band (an LP and several 7"´s on relevant record labels). They also appear in an documentary film "Made in Sheffield" (2003 I think), see WIKI article. Maybe you decide for an ReUp? Further communication to stephan.schwank@web.de, if you think, it´s necessary. Thanks.78.54.23.91 (talk) 11:04, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tojo Spam

Thanks for the fast reaction. Cheers, -- Chris 73 | Talk 15:55, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TKE

That was quick! Thanks.--Arxiloxos (talk) 17:46, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

why did you delete kirkslite, it is a REAL beer company and they are trying to expand! please put it back! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.27.195 (talk) 18:41, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Les Balsiger

This is a bit of boilerplate with which I'm contacting the folks most involved in the original discussion. I have no vested interest in the outcome. Hi, it's been nearly three years, but maybe you remember the fuss over the dab page Les Balsiger and the article Les Balsiger (activist). In a nutshell, to the best of my recollection, a college administrator with the same name as an anti-Catholic activist contacted Wikipedia after attempting to disambiguate himself from the activist. The administrator is a fine person, but as-of-yet non-notable.

In what was more-or-less an official Wikimedia Foundation action by User:BradPatrick, who was the foundation's legal counsel at the time, it was determined that a dab page should be created despite the fact that it didn't fit in with MOS:DABRL. Now a user insists that the Les Balsiger (activist) page be redirected to the Les Balsiger dab page. That is the current state of pages. I didn't agree with the initial decision that we needed a dab page, but I wish to uphold the decision made at the Afd. Should we reopen the Afd, or has the issue run its course?

Here are some links to the relevant history (not necessarily in chronological order): Talk:Les Balsiger (activist), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Les Balsiger (disambiguation), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Les Balsiger,Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Les Balsiger (2nd nomination), Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive173#Previously deleted Les Balsiger article reincarnated as a defamatory attack article -- on the wrong target?, and this short note regarding closing the Afd on the dab page.

Brad Patrick indicates that he's no longer to be contacted about Wikipedia legal matters, so I will be e-mailing this message to Mike Godwin via info-en at wikimedia dot org.

If the pages are kept in their current state, a history page merge may be in order and/or the talk pages need to be put in the correct places.

Let's discuss this at Talk:Les Balsiger (disambiguation) to keep it all in once place. Katr67 (talk) 19:00, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LOTROCast

Thank you for your vigilance in making sure that Wikipedia stays up to the high standards that have been set for it. I can see from your contributions that you play a big role in that process. However, I would request that you review your speedy deletion for the article on LOTROCast. You cite the lack of indication of notability by Wikipedia's guidelines. I would counter that by pointing to several sources I cited while writing up the article. In the references, I included three separate, independent and respected websites (including the mega-MMORPG website massivley.com and YouTube [which distributes LOTROCast's Video content and has previously recognized LOTROCast for high-volume viewers]). These two at least are established enough under the first point of Wikipedia's Notability Guidelines. It also meets point three of the notability guidelines...a few months back it was announced that CyberEars, a major podcast hosting company, would sponsor, oversee, and distribute LOTROCast. I remember that announcement a while back and can go find it if you like. If 'numbers' are what matter, I won't be able to help you there...LOTROCast has not released any listener numbers (but judging from the YouTube videos, I would guess it's in the tens of thousands). I can try and contact the host and see if I can get that information if it is needed. All this taken into account, I would request that you reconsider your decision and reinstate the article. I will accept your decision in either direction.

Thank you for your consideration, Sevey13 (talk) 21:37, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Catoctin Creek Distilling Company

Why did you delete the page for Catoctin Creek Distilling Company? It is a real company providing beverages in Loudoun County, Virginia, USA. The delete note mentions that the article did not indicate the importance of the subject. Guidance on how to correct this would be appreciated. Is it possible to get access to the deleted page for editing and resubmission?

scohar70(talk) 22:07, 8 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.165.80.2 (talk) [reply]

58.93.182.58

I noticed you blocked Special:Contributions/58.93.182.58. Those look like Good faith edits(well reverts) to me. Why is this IP blocked? By the way, I have no conneciton to this IP, just that I saw one of the reverts come up on my watchlist and was surprise to find IP editor blocked. SunCreator (talk) 00:32, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I understand now. SunCreator (talk) 14:12, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My first article!

Yes, I was reading from several promotional sources, and was perhaps over enthusiastic about my subject. I'd really like to work out from under the stigma of an "advert" box. I've removed an adjective or two, but I would really appreciate your input on neutralizing my new article so I can get rid of that nasty box. Zaz-en (talk) 04:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Protected redirect

About a year ago, you protected the redirect Twilight (film). Would you consider unprotection? Or, if you think continued protection is warranted, could you change the anchor from "Film" to "Film, television and theatre", and add the tags {{R from incomplete disambiguation}} and {{R to section}}? Thanks. (Watching here, so replying here is OK.)--ShelfSkewed Talk 05:05, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Denaro

Hi I came across the quite astonishing article, Jason Denaro. I see you speedy deleted it previously as advertising. I can't imagine it could have been any more promotional and peacocky than it is now. Can it be deleted as spam again, or does it have to do to afd? I can't find any reliable sources for the dude. 66.57.4.150 (talk) 08:10, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


2012 (band)

A7: Article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject

Above was what what you said about my band "2012" page that was listed the other day. The importance of the band was listed so I don't understand what the problem was? —Preceding unsigned comment added by R0ckg0d2012 (talk • contribs) 09:33, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I note you have deleted a number of links I had recently put on pages for towns in my local community, linking to Renfrewshire Law Centre. You contacted me to say you had made these deletions on the basis that the links constituted advertising. Please note the links were not advertising. The town pages describe local history and current socio-economic conditions, amenities, services etc. Renfrewshire Law Centre is a non-profit making local legal agency that provides important services to the local community. It is supported by local and national government as well as the court system. It is not a commercial organisation and runs according to charitable principles. There seems to be a lack of information in general on Wiki relating to the law centre movement, an important socio-economic development in British legal history over the last 30 years or so. On pages from which you deleted my links, I note you left in tact oler links which DO relate to commercial entities. This seems inconsistent and unfair. Accordingly, I would be grateful if you would reinstate the links or authorise their reinstatement. Kind regards, Jonkid

My Sandbox

Hi wanted to check-in and see if you've read my request, also posted above. Look forward to your feedback. (Original request)Thanks for your feedback. I made additional edits that i think better illustrate the significance of my entry. Let me know what you think and if it still runs a risk of deletion.

sandboxMichellecatin (talk) 20:06, 2 December 2009 (UTC) Michellecatin (talk) 21:39, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hello there

hi there, im new here and im so confused, can i ask you something?

TheLord'sMassiah (talk) 18:18, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

can i mess up this page?

TheLord'sMassiah (talk) 18:22, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) If you're going to ask why you got warned for blanking a page, it should be obvious. Anything else, ask away. --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 18:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. (sighs) Go to the sandbox. --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 18:24, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yizhao Ling

I WANT TO READ THE ARCTICLE about he real person "Yizhao Lang"!!! HE/SHE IS IMPORTANT because he is IN THE BANNER ON THE TOP of WIKIPEDIA !!!!

NawlinWiki deleted the Article.. I WANT TO READ THAT !! Why do you delete important informations???

(Sorry that I write here, but I dont know where else...) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.173.199.126 (talk) 19:58, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to bottom of page. NawlinWiki deleted the article because it didn't show any indication that it was notable. --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 18:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"The Plastics" South African Band

Hi I was trying to learn wikipedia and i saw that one of my faveourite bands did not have a page so i decided to make one for them. I dont understand why u delete it? they are a proper band they play big shows here in South Africa check out there facebook,myspace and website. They are evening going to be working with Gordon Raphael (the producer of the first two strokes albums) so please tell me why u keep deleting the page that i am creating? thanks

Final warning exceeded

Hello, you gave a final warning to a school IP here, however the vandalism continues. I'll keep an eye on their edits for the next bit, but if you do a school block it would be appreciated. Cheers, --Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 20:30, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Thankyou for giving me a second chance I wont vandalize again —Preceding unsigned comment added by That Guy with the Glasses (talk • contribs) 20:44, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why revert my edits?

Wembley. Why reverted my edits?

Why Delete "The Spoony One"

Why did you delete my Spoony One page. user:jwillow —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.67.134.66 (talk) 21:37, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FragFM

Might be worth salting it as well- it's been created 4 times. Regards, HJMitchell You rang? 17:33, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hatcher murphy disorder

hey, my original page creation was not intended to be promotional, but i understand your logic. so, i have revamped my content and deem it non-promotional. I am a third party and am not affiliated monetarily with the company that discovered this medical disorder. my goal is of an academic purpose and to provide support of this medical discovery through wikipedia. the next entry will not mention the research company or promote any treatment procedure provided by the company. however, i feel it is appropriate to include the research company's website and their youtube channel in the See Also section, because it will prove a simple pathway for people to conduct further research into the topic.

in summation i have removed a large portion of the text which would be considered promotional. I am third party and I have further neutralized the subject.

Thanks

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NawlinWiki/Archive_41&oldid=331481958"