Talk:Sheesh Mahal (Lahore Fort)
![]() | Sheesh Mahal (Lahore Fort) was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 29, 2008). There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Template:WP1.0 Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
![]() | A fact from Sheesh Mahal (Lahore Fort) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 April 2008, and was viewed approximately 2,240 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
2005
Uh, the article on Aurangzeb and on the Taj Mahal says that Shah Jahan was imprisoned in the Sheesh mahal in the Agra Fort which certainly is _not_ in Pakistan, but those articles link _here_. Is _this_ article pointing to the WRONG sheesh Mahal, or are there TWO halls of mirrors, one in Lahore and one in Agra? Or do we need a disambiguation page? or what? I'm confusedRick Boatright 4 July 2005 00:24 (UTC)
I believe there are more than one Sheesh Mahal. The article links here incorrectly.193.251.135.123 23:29, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
Version 0.7
This article has been nominated for Version 0.7 of the offline Wikipedia release but did not meet the standards for importance. It has been put on Wikipedia:Release_Version_Nominations/Held_nominations for further review. Please see that page for details.
This article could perhaps be used as part of a Lahore Fort collection, but it really doesn't score highly on any of our importance rankings. Please also see my comments at Talk:Naulakha_Pavilion#Version_0.7. Walkerma (talk) 03:38, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Basic English
I presume the first sentence intends to refer to the country of India, not the adjective "Indian," and to use "which" rather than "with." Incredible that this was published, let alone that other commenters didn't even notice. 76.23.157.102 (talk) 18:52, 28 December 2009 (UTC)