Jump to content

User talk:Jarry1250

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Or24 (talk | contribs) at 12:04, 20 February 2010 (→‎Your Bot: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jarry1250.


User talk
  • If I left you a message: please answer on my talk page, or at least prod me.
  • If you leave me a message: I will answer on your talk page (probably), except where this is inconvienient.
  • Please click here to leave me a new message.

DYK for Ralph Creffeild

Updated DYK query On February 12, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ralph Creffeild, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:00, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LivingBOT/new GA list

Not sure if this is preventable, but in this edit the bot listed an article as new when actually the title was just (slightly) altered. (The article was promoted back in 2008.) --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Malvern

Alright - there's no need to lay it on so thick, especially in edit summaries; we can all make minor mistakes. - I'm just as experienced an editor as you are. Thanks anyway.--Kudpung (talk) 12:29, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Possibly unfree File:Oldbuckenham-30march1946.jpg

What is wrong with it? The image has been on Wikipedia for years Bwmoll3 (talk) 12:41, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

your bot is flagging multiple images uploaded in 2006. What is wrong with them? Bwmoll3 (talk) 15:31, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't believe so.... [from "Copyright for Archivists" by Tim Padfield] http://www.museumscopyright.org.uk/crown-a.pdf Photograph was taken in the late 1940s, therefore the Copyright expires 50 years after creation

In addition, I've digitally enhanced and clarified the original images - my own work.

Regards Bwmoll3 (talk) 19:24, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me - I'll go though them all and add the tag as required. Take care :) Bwmoll3 (talk) 19:32, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:01, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wendell H. Ford

Thanks for your comments on my FA nom of Wendell H. Ford. I definitely understand wanting to abide by copyright law; I try to raise awareness of that issue myself in both my professional and personal life. Nonetheless, I have serious doubts that I will be able to provide conclusive proof of the "freeness" of the images in question. If they cannot be satisfactorily proven to be free, they really ought to be deleted from Commons so others are not using them as free on or off of Wikimedia-related projects. Would you consider FFD'ing them and striking your oppose? I presently have 3 supports (counting myself as the nominator) and an admin will likely want to close the nom soon. I still need another support, but I'd hate to have to restart the nomination over this relatively small issue. If you prefer not to strike your oppose and go to FFD, then let me know ASAP and I will just remove the images. Thanks. Acdixon (talk contribs count) 18:47, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for understanding. I hope something will occur to bring some closure to the larger issue of congressional portraits and the Biographical Directory. As I primarily edit politician articles, I suspect this will not be the last time I encounter it. Acdixon (talk contribs count) 19:12, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Bot

Hello to you,
Something got worng in your bot source code,
Can you fix it? Thank you and good week. Sabbath Shalom, אור גוטמן (talk) 12:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]