User talk:Misconceptions2

I do not feel like asking for an unban anymore, i wont let anyone bully me, all i want to do is make constructive edits. "Razimantv", you know that i am banned and i can do nothing about it.But, One day i hope to get un-banned and will report you for all you have done.

Whoever said that i am a "loser" and should "commit suicide" at the bottom of my page (here) is really stretching my temper. I am assuming it was Razimatv and his gang. I am only 1 person, but you will NEVER BREAK me and will never cause me to commit SUICIDE.You people are horrible. I dont want to be part of this community anymore.

I just need a rest, the more i stay on this website, the more depressed i get. I have realised that on wikipedia whoever has more people on their side wins

When did I ever send you a message?

Hello there, Misconceptions2. It seems you had quite a mistake writing in my talk page. I have removed the speedy deletion tag for the mentioned article in the page because it was quite significant in my point of view, but I don't remember talking to you. I hope you clearly state when and where I sent you a message in my talk page. Thanks! --Hoverflew0909 (talk) 13:57, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Farewell (no more edits until i can prove i can follow rules)

I was banned for sock puppetry for 1 month, then when that ran out, everything got out of hand after that edit war incident.

I will take a break and come back after 1 month or 4 months or even a year.To prove that i am ready to follow wikiepedia rules and wont try evading my lifeban.. i will not make any socks in the meantime ! I will prove how much i willing to follow wikipedia policies.

I hope an admin can unblock me for my actions, as i believe it is the only wat to prove that i am willingto follow the rules

I dont know how an edit war can get so out of hand.

Standard offer

Misconceptions2, if you ever see this, I suggest you read Wikipedia:Standard offer. It is not a guarantee that anything will change. It is suggested guidance for how long to wait and how to go about asking to be unblocked when you think you're ready. --Mysdaao ^talk 18:54, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Mysdaao, thank you very much for all you have done, i think you have done far too much. I saw how you reverted vandalism/personal attacks of my page, and ive seen how you always respond, when people use the "help user template". But unfortunately i have been an idiot, and deserve to get bannned for some time. I will be back later.Take care--Misconceptions2 (talk) 19:10, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. I'm sorry things didn't work out. Take care. --Mysdaao ^talk 03:01, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Help me (AN/I , personal attacks)

{{helpme}} How do i ban a user from editing my talk page. Please help me report these incidents, i dont want anymore personal attacks.

You cannot yourself, it would be wise to bring this up at WP:ANI.  fetchcomms☛ 18:07, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

{{helpme}}

yes, please can you help me report these incidents on WP:ANI.Is it possible to get page protection. i wont let anyone bully me. Right now i am banned and these people know i cant report them.

1 user created a page dedicated to me, with a list of all the edits i made, and how he plans on cleaning it all up by removing my edits.Another user keeps adding all the unblock request i asked for about a long time ago back on my page.

Another user said i should die, i cant bear this anymore. I dont even wanna get unbanned, i just feel like an idiot. I regret getting involved into an edit war with these people.

Please leave me in PEACE, am begging you, please.I will never edit war ever again. I will not make any sock puppets either.--Misconceptions2 (talk) 18:28, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Misconceptions2 - if you would like to be unblocked, please use the {{unblock}} template, with your reason. Thanks, Fleetflame · whack! whack! · 19:38, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

{{helpme}} Thanks for your reply. But i do not want to be unblocked,i have been an idiot.I just want to report an incident.

You misunderstood the question sir, basically some users have been leaving personal attacks on my user page. I want to know how i can report these incidents to WP:ANI so that i can get my page protected. because i am currently ban and am unable to report these people.

What should i do to report this at WP:ANI while banned?

Also an admin will never unblcock me, and i have been an idiot and dont want to get unblocked, until i can prove that i am willing to follow wikipedia rules without causing distruption for 6 months--Misconceptions2 (talk) 19:56, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

I will watch your user pages for vandalism, thus saving you the trouble of reporting it. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:32, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

how do i get these users banned ! --Misconceptions2 (talk) 20:35, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

All unblcoked request i made in the past 2009-2010

This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for and that edit was the same copyvio as was added back by 86.18.223.124 and Admit-the-truth, I am blocking you for a period approximately concurrent with the remaining block on your admitted ip. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:13, 8 December 2009 (UTC) Blocked for Two weeks Since it is less then a month since your last block and you are now edit warring, I have escalated your block to the next block point which is two weeks. If you feel this block is unfair you can use {{unblock|''insert your reason here''}} Spartaz Humbug! 17:01, 2 January 2010 (UTC) This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Misconceptions2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: have you read the talk page ,do you know whats been going on? Basically we got an admisntrator invovled, since there was an edit war and dispute over the sources. We were told not to make any edit or reverts until a consensus had been reached with the Admins. But 3 users kept removing extreme amounts of data from that article since they do not consider the sources reliable. these sources were being discuss with admins. So i reverted them. I think it is really unfair. Whoever told u i was edit warring has mis represented the information. Please see the discussion page of the article Muhammad and assassinations.one of the users who was involved is below. i admit that i was invoved in an edit war. but just to make sure the users dont delete entire chunks of data.please look at the discussion, i tried discussing with these users, i even tried mediating.Look at talk page to see how i have got admins invovled. But they kept removing sources when a consensus had not been reached Decline reason: You continued edit warring after getting an admin involved here: [1]. You seem to have a misconception about edit warring. Perhaps you should read WP:EW. Toddst1 (talk) 18:59, 2 January 2010 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Misconceptions2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: You have made a mistake regarding edit warring after ban. Please do not block me permantely. initally you blocked me for 2 weeks. i will be smart and will come back after two weeks.i had a really bad day today and was unable to reach a consesnsus with users which resulted in an edit war. Please reduce the block to 2 weeks. The person who carried on editing articles was my roomate. he has a different ip address.My ip is 86.18.223.124. his is 188...something banned the user with the Ip 188. Not me ! because my account did nto carry on edit warring !!!!! Decline reason: Does your roommate also have one arm? In any case, declined, since new users or IPs who make edits that are substantially similar to those of a blocked editor may be blocked as if they were one and the same. —Jeremy (v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!) 21:37, 2 January 2010 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Misconceptions2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: If you can not be bothered reading all of this, jump to the bottom, update section... :::*I was banned for edit warring, then i was permanently banned for allegedly editing articles with an ip address 188.XX which constitutes to evading a ban? I admit that i had access to this IP, it is a shared ip at my university, and i used it rarely to login to wikipedia. My ip is 86.XX, here is proof .A checkuser can verify this. I did not edit anything after i was banned. The ip that edited articles after my ban 188.XX, that is my university campus ip.The ip has been linked to me because i used it once to login. This ip continued to edit articles after my ban,it does not mean it was me, many people have access to it, and its been banned several times!!!! I will admit i was involved in sockpuppetry before and was banned for a month or so.Here.After that incident i got scared of using socks. Also, in that sock investigation the checkuser never said the ip 188.XX is mine, see conclusion. :::*I did not get banned for the accusation of meat puppetry, check my block log, i was banned for edit warring, then accused of evading a ban, since the admin believes the user xxGustakh and mirroryou1, was a meat puppet of mine. The user mirroyou1 was since unbanned and Gustakhxxx is not even contesting his ban. :::*The checkuser says we "the suspects" use two different browswers and has said that we have 2 different ip's. but then the checkuser said that this does not prove anything, how does it not. :::*Update: Lets no concentrate on the past, instead what i can offer to wikipedia and my proposal. :::*1. Complete 20+ articles regarding historical battles in Arabia with a NPOV (I intended to complete all the battles in that campaign box above that are red). Also help users who use the {helpuser} template :::*2. Go through 5 articles for wikipedia and clean them up as punishment, and make sure the the articles match with the references and add tags such as , (This will help me become a bettr wikipedian, but you must move the articles to my sandbox). :::*3. Submit new cool ideas to wikipedia , such as a new wikipedia project called "wiki quarantine" where people submit names of famous viruses and guides on how to remove them, very helpful. More ideas below. :::*4.I promise to TRY not to edit war ever again, and i am willing to accept a ban of 4 months, and a "1 year ban on reverts". To reduce to chance of an edit war i will try to mediate (i did this using a wikipedia 3rd opinion feature, but mediator never came,a big help they were !) :::*5.I was such a stupid person, i think i can change. I use wikipedia regularly.Its my hobby and is fun. I am only a university student, who has exams coming up, and i dont want any stress.Please reduce my life ban, based on what i have to offer.Am begging you to be reasonable.I promise to STOP this behaviour and not edit war.This promise will be kept if you implement a "1 revert per article for a year" ban on me.I feel i have learnt a lesson, if i step out of line after this, then take serious measures.--Misconceptions2 (talk) 23:46, 6 January 2010 (UTC) Update: Admin advice, admin told me to address the following: *The block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia: because i promise not to edit war (see above on how i will keep this promise), and i refuse to use sock puppets (if i was that kind of person, i would have used them already to evade this ban).But, I want to follow wikipedia rules and not make things worse, and its been a long time since my ban. *The block is no longer necessary because: I understand I have been blocked for edit warring and evading a ban through meat/sock puppetry *I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead: (see my proposal and intentions above on what i plan to offer).I feel i have learnt my lesson, this life ban made my heart stop and think for a moment.I was such a stupid prson and want a 2nd chance. Decline reason: We don't negotiate blocks. Nobody is that valuable. Plus, the long-winded complaints about why you got blocked aren't helping. If you can't make your point succinctly, you're just rambling. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:31, 10 January 2010 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

940+This user has made more than 940 contributions to Wikipedia.