User talk:Hoverflew0909

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Hoverflew0909, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Philippine Eagle. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! maclean (talk) 01:20, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Tagged Something[edit]

{{helpme}} Excuse me for my obvious ignorance, but I recently tagged a talk page for speedy deletion (or something else) because of a copyright violation. Is this an administrator-only privilege? Please do correct my action in any way possible if what I did was incorrect. Thanks! --Hoverflew0909 (talk) 12:10, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

If it is a talkpage, you can just remove the material and cite WP:copyvio as the reasoning.
Warm regards, JaakobouChalk Talk 12:43, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:!Lee![edit]

Hello Hoverflew0909, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of User:!Lee! - a page you tagged - because: User does exist, or this is not a user page. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Closedmouth (talk) 12:50, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

And Another Tag[edit]

{{helpme}} Another of my ignorance. I recently checked the recent changes and tagged Muhammad and assassinations for cleanup, since I think that it is quite notable and should not be deleted. Am I allowed to remove the speedy deletion tag? Thanks!--Hoverflew0909 (talk) 13:40, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

There is no speedy deletion tag there. You can remove the cleanup tag if you want. Just leave a note in the edit summary explaining why. BejinhanTalk 13:55, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
(e/c) You are allowed to remove a speedy deletion tag when you understand the issue and find that it is blatantly incorrect. Here I do not think you understood the issue. The tagging was as a copyright violation. The notability of the subject has no bearing whatever on that issue. The most notable subject in the world should be deleted if it is a copyright violation. In fact, you could argue that the more notable the topic, the more crucial it is that we delete the article on it quickly if it is a copyright violation because the more notable, the more likely it is that it will be visited, thus exposing Wikipedia to potential liability for hosting the copyright infringing content. In any event, I have declined the speedy because checking the page that it was stated as a copyright violation of, I couldn't find any verbatim copying of text, so I don't know what the tagger meant when they marked it as infringing that source. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:00, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Hoverflew0909[edit]

The article Muhammad and assinations has been proposed for deletion.

A lot of the references and section of data have been remved by people who do not like criticism of islam.and they

U rejected deletion originally.go here if you still have the same views regarding deletion. if you want it to be deleted then say so.

Also anyone who accuses me of canvassing, then let it be known that this user hoverflw sent me a message to reply to him.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Muhammad_and_assassinations --Misconceptions2 (talk) 16:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Katrina parker[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Katrina parker has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. West Eddy (talk) 08:06, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

I have added a reliable source and deleted the said tag. Thank you for the notice. --Hoverflew0909 (talk) 10:07, 2 May 2012 (UTC)