User talk:86.26.143.205
November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to EOKA, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Alansohn (talk) 02:13, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to EOKA has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Mpdelbuono (talk) 08:57, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
EOKA
As according to Wikipedia:Word to Avoid, we can not just say "Group X" is a terrorist organization. However, using references, you CAN state that "(Nation)" recognizes the EOKA as a terrorist organization. --Kansas Bear (talk) 05:04, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to EOKA appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Fieldday-sunday (talk) 19:53, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
December 2009
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Jerusalem. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Rami R 11:54, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
EOKA
Please stop removing the Republic of Cyprus' view of EOKA. It should be included in the section just as the opinion of Northern Cyprus (which is of course an unrecognised state). 217.204.139.253 (talk) 19:04, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
EOKA
Hi I have noticed that your have repeatedly reverted the edits on EOKA made by various editors. I do not understand why you keep removing material:
- Yes, the Turkish view is that this was a terrorist organisation, and this information is there to be seen.
- Why are you removing the fact that Northern Cyprus is an unrecognised state?
- Why are you removing the fact that currently the BBC does not refer to EOKA as a terrorist organisation (although it did in the past), a point that is well referenced.
- The same applies to the US
- Finally, why are you repeatedly removing the perception of the Republic of Cyprus? Does that not deserve mention?
Please refrain from placing inaccurate information on Wikipedia. Georgeg (talk) 00:07, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |