Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhang Haijie

Zhang Haijie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete This article is a hoax, a nonsense as well as outrageous, inappropriate and offensive and unconstructive. Youmaynotknowme (talk) 19:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have read the "Deletion Policy" and fully understood the content. And my decision to delete the page is in accordance with the terms specified in the Policy:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_policy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons

I have also read the "Guide To Deletion" and fully understood the content. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Youmaynotknowme (talk • contribs) 09:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to delete the page for a few good reasons:

The creater of the page has obviously vandalized it by giving informations, strongly believed to be false, incorrect and/or inaccurate.

The creator of the page has given out someone else's private information without getting the permission from the affected person, hence, violating the rights to that person's personal privacy.

This is completely nonsense, meaningless, unconstructive and outrageous.

Obviously, I have tried the "db delete because" function as explained in the help section but does not work.

Here are just some of the hyperlinks to the help section where you can find advices for user who finds article inappropriate, offensive and also, MOST IMPORTANTLY, violating the "comunally agreed policies and guidelines."

1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_administrator_intervention_against_vandalism

2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contact_us/Article_problem/Vandalism

3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contact_us/Article_problem/Factual_error

4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_discussions

Please take your time to consider these facts seriously and grant my request to delete the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhang_Haijie for good.

If you were to take a look at the "History" section at the top of the page, you will also find others' opinions, concerns and debates contributed by other members of the public about removing and deleting the page.

Please note that many people including myself sees this as an etiquette problem.

Keep. This presenter certainly seems notable by wikipedia standards, being the anchor on a news program and winning a few awards to boot. I don't see which parts of the article are causing concern, perhaps the nominator would like to point these out? Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:11, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - While this person seems notable per WP:BIO (won an award), I'm not finding many reliable sources (I'm not sure if this ref is reliable). Are there are non-English refs that I'm not finding? The nominator should also read WP:BEFORE, as AfD is for articles that do not meet Wikipedia's notability policy. This is not the place to deal with editing/content issues. PDCook (talk) 22:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As individual is not a hoax and the award and award nominations appear to meet WP:ANYBIO [1][2]. Translating these from Chinese language could be further helpful. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:10, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Please note that "Notability" is only ONE OF THE GUIDELINE to create a good article. Furthermore, I DO NOT SEE that this article has conform with the "Notability" guideline. Our main discussion here is about DELETING this article and I think it is only correct if we pay our attention on whether or not this article has indeed violated the criteria for "Deletion", as specified in the "Deletion Policy". In this discussion, we have to be relevant to be on the track, NOT off the track. I strongly urge commentators to read the "Notability Guideline" properly before providing their opinions on this issue. By carefully reading and understanding it will help you to provide a reasonable point of view on this discussion. Please not that Wikipedia's "Guideline and Policy" is a general suggestion to users to make proper use of it, not to misuse it. It is also NOT above the Law. Any found guilty of violating the Law can face legal consequences. Please read this carefully again: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_policy and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons.Youmaynotknowme (talk) 09:34, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]