User talk:Carl.bunderson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 24.44.93.16 (talk) at 05:12, 28 March 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Performance management

Hey Carl. I'm not sure why you deleted my updates to the performance management definition. I run a research firm on this topic and this is my profession - and you are a religious scholar. Why would you just "delete" things posted by subject matter experts? I'm not sure I get it. Thanks. jbersin —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbersin (talkcontribs) 17:23, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP does not allow self promotion, OR, or linking to blogs. The post I put on your talk page should explain why I've reverted some of your edits. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 17:47, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - July 2009

The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter

Archives  |  Tip Line  |  Editors

The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter
Issue X - July 2009
Project news
  • The Christianity project and its related projects currently have 76 FAs, 8 FLs, and 148 GAs. We gained new recognized content in each field, with 4 FAs promoted, 2 FLs, and 3 GAs. Congratulations and a big thank you to all those who worked on these articles!
Member news
Other news
  • I am still working on the categorization matter. With any luck, we should have some results by the end of the month. There are also some discussions regarding project related activities at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/General Forum. One issue in particular that might be addressed is possible elections of new coordinators. Anyone interested in serving in such a capacity is more than welcome to indicate as much.
Related projects news
Member contest of the month
  • The previous contests are still ongoing, because of the extreme amount of time the categorization is taking me. Anyone who can bring any of the few Stub class articles among the project's 1000 most often accessed articles by the end of July will get an award. Please see the details Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity#Project challenge of the month.
Christianity related news
From the Members

Welcome to the Tenth issue of the WikiProject Christianity newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do.

It has been a long time since the last coordinators election. There is a lot for people to do, and I certainly would welcome seeing any individuals with an interest in such a position put themselves forward as candidates. I in particular would very much like to see some degree of "specialization" in the coordinators, so that, for instance, we might have someone knowledgable about some of the specific Christian faith traditions or other main subjects, like Orthodoxy, Lutheranism, Mormonism, the Jehovah's Witnesses, art, theology, and so on. If any parties who have experience with some of our faith- or- subject-based content would be interested in being candidates, I would love to see them do so. Please feel free to take part in the discussion regading what the minimum number of category items is, and how to deal with the non-qualifying categories, on the General Forum page.

John Carter (talk) 23:26, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
This newsletter is automatically delivered by ~~~~

John Carter (talk) 23:09, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Afghanistan

Hi there. You reverted one of my edits on Afghanistan. I just wanted to make clear I did not change the denonyms. What I changed was the reference. The reference note is set out in a very convoluted way with two references within it. It would be easier to include it as a straightforward reference. The actual citations were slightly incorrect in that they purport to quote a dictionary when they are actually quoting a website which quotes a dictionary. Green Giant (talk) 16:03, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing is that how the demonyms are handled was a very contentious issue a couple/few years ago. The status quo has been stable for some time, and that is the only reason I reverted you. If you still want it your, admittedly simpler/more straightforward, way, please revert me. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 04:28, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have changed back, but it's not really a reversion. Green Giant (talk) 07:06, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have reverted Green Giant's edit and explained it on his talk page. Cheers. Tajik (talk) 11:06, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Christianity Newsletter - August 2009

Ethnic structure of Republic of Chile

The white people in Chile are 52% sources: http://convergencia.uaemex.mx/rev38/38pdf/LIZCANO.pdf —Preceding unsigned comment added by NewAntarticwik (talkcontribs) 03:19, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You do need to make it clear when you edit articles that you are replacing out-dated content with up-to-date sourced content. It is difficult to see the value of an edit that changes sourced content without explicitly explaining the situation. Thank you for the note, though. Cheers, carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 20:05, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Open source hardware‎

Unlikely to be "self" promotion. Marty (Diehl Martin) died a couple of years back.

Sadly this does mean that those FreeIO redlinks were likely to stay that way forever, so it's a good wikiprune, but it is rather a shame that the FreeIO project seems to have ground to a halt since. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:19, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I just assume, when someone adds nothing but information relating to a single company. If any of the links were actually going to become blue I wouldn't mind keeping them. But a new editor adding nothing but links and a "reference" about that single company... I doubt it. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 18:26, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry posting my ip:User_talk:99.228.199.20 address a spam ... I will not edit an article .. Thank you

Please see my response on your talk page. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 19:26, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

so how can i remove my ip of the site ... User_talk:99.228.199.20 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.228.199.20 (talk) 19:59, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can't. This is as far as this can go. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 20:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment of Alcohol in the Bible

Hello, I see that you are taking on the clean up of this article in response to my GA Reassessment. I'm going to extend the hold as I see that great progress is being made. Please notify me when you are done so that I can finalize the review. Thank you for your work on this important subject and overall for your work on Christian-related articles. It is much-needed. H1nkles (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, H1nkles. Honestly, I doubt it's going to make it to GA status. Pretty much all I've done is cut down on material; it probably needs things added. Sorry for the hold-up, I've just been really busy this week. I'll try and finish it in the next few days. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 16:41, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am now done. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions)

Renaming SBC resurge/takeover article

The article currently titled "Southern Baptist Convention Conservative Resurgence/Fundamentalist Takeover" will soon change its name. An early straw poll narrowed the choices to six alternatives, listed at: Talk:Southern Baptist Convention Conservative Resurgence/Fundamentalist Takeover#Straw poll 2 (once this thread is archived, see here.)

If you wish to rank the names suggested there, please do so soon. Please put other comments BELOW rather than interpersed among suggested names. Thanks. --AuthorityTam (talk) 18:28, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Good job

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
Thou hast contributed much for knowledge. Keepith the good work up.

- - BennyK95 - Talk October 8 2009 (UTC)

Happy all Saints and all Souls day!

Hello I just wanted to wish you an early Happy all Saints and all Souls day! May you have a blessed feast and God bless! - BennyK95 - Talk 17:02, October 25 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, Benny, you too. I'll offer vespers tonight that you attain to sainthood. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 22:20, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Happy Holidays

Sarcophagus of Julian

Why did you delete it?

The Sarcophagus of the Roman Emperor Julian the Apostate(Istanbul Archaeological Museum):

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Istanbul_-_Museo_archeologico_-_Sarcofagi_imperiali_bizantini_-_Foto_G._Dall%27Orto_28-5-2006.jpg (on the left)

& http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Istanbul_-_Museo_archeologico_-_Sarcofagi_imperiali_bizantini_-_Foto_G._Dall%27Orto_28-5-2006_2.jpg (in the middle)

Turkish source: "Topkapı Sarayı ve Çevresinin Bizans Devri Arkeolojisi" (by Hülya Tezcan)

The Sarcophagus of Julian the Apostate: first in the Church of the Holy Apostles > Topkapı Palace (until 1847) > Hagia Eirene /Aya İrini Church (until 1916) > Istanbul Archaeological Museum now! (& there is no cross on it! because he was not a christian!)

But he was buried in the Church of the Holy Apostles in a porphyry sarcophagus. from: http://www.ellopos.net/elpenor/vasilief/julian-apostate.asp?pg=10

It is generally accepted that the Emperor Julian was reburied in the Church of the Holy Apostles at Constantinople at some unknown date after his initial burial outside Tarsus in Cilicia in 363. Böri (talk) 09:51, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The point of the post is unclear. Talk pages should be used only to discuss improving the article. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 22:57, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

]


Hola Señor, vi un mensaje suyo en mi buzon. Me podria por favor explicar a que se refiere? Gracias. Hello Sr, I received a message from you on my mailbox and I really don't understand what are you trying to say, or rather, why do you say that. First, who are you? Why did you write to me? What comment appear not to be constructive to you? I work at Columbia University, and I usually don't vandalize pages, rather, I try to contribute. Please let me know what I did wrong. Thank you. (I have no idea how to sign my posts, but I do what I can to contribute, however.) Gracias. Thank you.