Talk:Miley Cyrus

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Miley Cyrus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11: 20 days

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Musicians C‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Mid-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Disney C‑class High‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

Stephen Foley (February 3, 2009). "Is Wikipedia cracking up?". The Independent.
"The 50 most-viewed Wikipedia articles in 2009 and 2008". The Daily Telegraph. August 17, 2009.
Gene Byrd (August 26, 2009). "Wikipedia and Editor: Robert Pattinson & Miley Cyrus Hoaxes Cause Changes?". The National Ledger.

is it me or.....?

Did the controversy surrounding photos of her in underwear get removed? To date there are 3 controveries surrounding her right? Under photos, Vanity Fair, and Party in the USA? The teen awards says something like she already had a risque image, so I'm guesing this is referring to the 1st contro.?

Why did it get removed? It was talked about for a while, and damaged her image right? So its pretty notable. not raggin on anything, but what happened to it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.219.104 (talk) 02:11, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was removed because it was judged a non-notable controversy in a previous discussion. Consensus can change, however, so you are welcome to discuss why it should be re-added. liquidluck✽talk 00:20, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was quite surprised to see it removed, but I haven't been lurking on this talk page so much recently, I've been bus elsewhere. I didn't like it how it was though. Maybe it's worth a sentence or 2 with supporting references,l not much more than that. What does anyone else think? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. There's also the asian photo controversy. Perhaps organize all the photo controversies in a single section. liquidluck✽talk 00:35, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Although the controversy section should be merged into life/career, as it's basically a repository for negative information and, since its located at the end, leaves the reader with a poor view of Cyrus. liquidluck✽talk 00:37, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! $4bn? She's having a laugh! I think we'd be accused of cruft if we added that in (unless she wins... :S). Agreed on the controversy section, they're generally best avoided- rather like "trivia" and "in popular culture" sections. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:43, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Entrepreneur section

Should the entrepreneur section be broken out to Level 2 heading? – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 00:42, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say we probably want a section called something like "other work" for most things that aren't part of her singing and acting, and that it should be placed in there, but still as a level 3 header, but its current position is a little odd. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:51, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with its current position being odd. Okay, Other work is a great idea. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 01:08, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Saturday Night Live

Oi! For the record, this reversion of JB Ferri (talk · contribs)'s edit was based on information from a Wikipedia article that stated Miley Cyrus was a guest musician on Saturday Night Live, until I found that JB Ferri had added that information only moments before. I cannot find any reliable source reporting that she was ever on this show, so please forgive my misinformed edit summary entry. I'm about to revert this user's other edit; please correct me if I'm wrong. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 02:51, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Backflip123 --AussieLegend (talk) 09:25, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the Friends for Change edits, among his many others, but these I couldn't revert simply because I wasn't sure exactly what was vandalism, what wasn't, simply based on my own ignorance.Your evidence is pretty compelling. Are you not going to add the {{subst:Uw-socksuspect|casename}} on their userpages? It would definitely help notify those of us who don't see your message here. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 09:46, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the new pic

I love the new pic it's the best.--216.232.216.224 (talk) 01:51, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]