User talk:Zidonuke

Welcome to my talk page!

Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page.
Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end.
Please use a new ==Descriptive heading== for new topics.
Please indent your posts with ":" if replying to an existing topic (or "::" if replying to a reply).
I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to Watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

False Positive =

Please be advised that you are enforcing a false positive which had already been reported to Cluebot. The changes I made improved the article significantly by removing out of topic information. Thank you. DrJenkinsPhd (talk) 22:41, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hi - I've readded the flag. Any admin can revert the deletion ofyour pages if you like - just drop them a note or ask at WP:AN Pedro : Chat 15:03, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the rollback again. Its great to return to global war on vandalism! --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 18:44, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Re: Gumb

Re your message: No problem. The seven day protection should cover the length of the AfD if the AfD is not closed early. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:12, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Hello, why was I warned? My edit was informative. 24.147.72.221 (talk) 14:55, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed my revert and your recent contributions. The warning I served was called for. Thank you! --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 15:00, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

American Signal Corporation

I WANTED this article to be deleted, I cannot verify proper info, people keep pissing at ME about it, no one is fixing it, abusive users are making life hard for me, and I'm very sick and tired of it.--JustInn014 (talk) 05:19, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like the article American Signal Corporation deleted then tag it properly conforming to the policies on WP:DEL. Please don't change other things on the article while tagging. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 05:25, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for the help. --JustInn014 (talk) 05:26, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible for someone else to delete the page? I'm not understanding how the deletion policy works... --JustInn014 (talk) 05:33, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The process works by tagging an article for deletion using the proper reason then an administrator will review the deletion request and act on it appropriated. (At least in a nutshell that is) --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 05:35, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

I do not think that this article will qualify for speedy deletion, thus it will not be an administrator’s decision. It could qualify for a deletion discussion, in which case, it would be the Wikipedia community that decides, with an administrator making the final decision as to deletion consensus. The process for starting a deletion discussion is outlined at WP:AFD. But, JustInn, I wouldn’t worry about it: Eventually some deletionist will come along and do it for you, if the article truly cries out for deletion. If you don’t want to edit it anymore, just take it off of your watchlist and stop editing it. By the way, I ended up here because I followed the Huggle trail to this discussion. — Spike Toronto 05:51, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, I didn't bother explaining it in detail but thanks for that. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 05:54, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

I see now. I'll just wait for a more experienced deletionist to come by and delete it. Thanks for the help. --JustInn014 (talk) 07:30, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Green Roofs Page

Sidonuke - Help ! :-) I noticed you have been editting the green roofs page. I have an image from the Green Roof referred to in the wikipedia text on Green Roofs in Greece and have been trying to upload it without success . Could you tell me how to do it - My email is jara@otenet.gr My Facebook account is Andrew Michael Clements

Andrew —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew Michael Clements (talk • contribs) 15:52, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I wouldn't remember an exact process on how to do it at this time but when I get a chance I'll look it up. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 19:44, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Samba

This subject was written by a Brazilian who does not have a good command of English. Don't get me wrong, I'm not against Brazilians - my wife is Brazilian. However, the English is often ungrammatical and even incomprehensible. My wife and I are trying to clean up an article on a subject we both love - samba. We understand what the writer is attempting to say and want to clean up the article to make it not only authoritative but also well-written. This was acknowledged by an editor who deleted the second graf because its English was so jumbled. Please do not consider that clearly articulating the language, including using proper adjectives (i.e., "icon" for "symbol") constitutes vandalism. I would like to work on this article graf by graf, but if my work will be reverted, what's the point. See if my edits are not an improvement before you delete them. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.23.201 (talk) 17:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits seemed unconstructive at the time. I suggest using edit summaries and adding a

{{inuse}}

tag to the page. Anyways sorry about interrupting your work. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 19:46, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Capitalism

If that IP does that again and I don't get it first, hit him with a level-four warning; that's probably Heyheymonkees (talk · contribs). HalfShadow (talk) 20:34, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that it may of been him but a level four warning should only be used on repeat vandals. For now I'll keep an eye on the IP and User. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 20:38, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

problem

read the casualties section. now its bullshit. i only did the same... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.192.127.100 (talk) 22:54, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed your edit and it still appears that it was unconstructive. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 22:56, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Stephen Gately

An admin reverted your revert of two of my edits, as said edits were an improvement. Gayness 1 (talk) 23:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notification of that mistake. I have retracted the warning I placed on your page. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 23:51, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Uh...

You just reverted back to vandalism... Also, what version of Huggle are you using? I've never seen an edit summary like that from Huggle before... Until It Sleeps ^{T • C} 13:51, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Using a modified huggle to load a custom project configuration. I took the latest source from the google code page and recompiled a modded one. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 13:54, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

What kind of modifications have you made, exactly? Sounds rather interesting. Until It Sleeps ^{T • C} 13:56, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its rather complex. I see your on IRC, talk to me there (Sidonuke). --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 13:58, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Racist edit/National Front Article

I'm well aware that what I wrote on the NF article is considered vandalism. It was however, in response to previous vandalism on that page which contained racist, homophobic and nationalist slurs in light of the recent events in Manchester.

80.177.28.111 (talk) 14:00, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok... --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 14:04, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of David A. Kaiser

An article that you have been involved in editing, David A. Kaiser, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David A. Kaiser. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Bfigura ^(talk) 16:41, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I'll add comments when I gather them together. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 20:15, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Huggle

User Until It Sleeps told me that he got a modified version of Huggle from you which adds a Report Mistake to the edit summary. Is it possible for me to obtain the same? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:07, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Zidonuke. You have new messages at The Thing That Should Not Be's talk page.
Message added 22:06, 17 February 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

The Thing // Talk // Contribs 22:06, 17 February 2010 (UTC) [reply]

American Signal Corp. page wasn't deleted.

It is still full of errors, and it won't let me rewrite the article.

--JustInn014 (talk) 05:18, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

capitalization

Check the Wikipedia manual of style: as the word "state" is not part of the name, it is not capitalized. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.162.43.187 (talk) 06:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake there. Thanks for the notification. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 06:37, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Huggle

Are you still using a custom version? It doesn't look like it :( The Thing // Talk // Contribs 07:12, 14 April 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Reworked all my mods and even fixed a few null pointers! If you want one give me a Username and I'll hook you up again. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 10:56, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

That would be great. My pages are here, and here. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 12:49, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also it should be noted that I had to change my edit summary to remove the "(Report Mistake)" due to a complaint by Gurch... The Thing // Talk // Contribs 12:54, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So... is it ready yet? How about coming onto IRC for a while? The Thing // Talk // Contribs 13:09, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Zidonuke. You have new messages at The Thing That Should Not Be's talk page.
Message added 02:31, 15 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

~NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ message • changes) 02:31, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to legitimately edit the Cruise Control article. Step off.

See my talk page. I don't see why this is vandalism; these facts are perfectly true.

Hello, Zidonuke. You have new messages at [[User talk:67.60.4.100 (talk) 03:20, 15 April 2010 (UTC)|User talk:67.60.4.100 (talk) 03:20, 15 April 2010 (UTC)]].[reply]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Alright, I'll leave you to it. I reverted because in my personal opinion that it doesn't seem proper. Anyways I'm not reverting your stuff anymore for it. Thanks for the notification. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 03:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback (User Page Affair)

Hello, Zidonuke. You have new messages at Deagle AP's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I'd like to give you this for your efforts to place on your user page. Thanks once again. Deagle_AP (talk) 14:08, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FTA

This user is persistent in the fight against vandalism. Hence, the user has been entrusted with membership into Wikipedia's Fire Team Alpha.

Sorry!

Sorry, no one in my household made those vandalistic edits, this punk kid in the neighborhood named Tuan Le stole my IP address by accessing our router and made changes.

Well, thats nice and all but that IP is still vandalizing and has been warned. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 04:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

New IP Address?

If this kid keeps editing and causes vandalism, how do I reset my IP address so he can't access it and wikipedia?

Hello, Zidonuke. You have new messages at Sidonuke's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Unplug your internet for a while. :) --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 04:57, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi

Who gives the right to people that censor comments on destructive sects to have the last word?

Ok, no attacks, but why tolerate that users paid by the sects to keep negative comments out, to censor other comments? Do you reacted to that change?

Regards Wikipedia lover. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.203.189.130 (talk) 13:48, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just reverted what seems to of been a attack on the one editor. [this edit] Aside from that I don't support or censor anything if you have sources and references to back it up. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 13:53, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

OK, but you do not want that user to know that others do not share his opinions and censorship? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.203.189.130 (talk) 13:59, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

213.203.189.130 please read some wiki policies, start with WP:FIVE. I'm simply following policy. If you would like that category added please discuss it with pther editors on the talk page of the article.

Sidonuke, thanks for the revert but you didn't need to. Messages like that don't bother me. Sean.hoyland - talk 14:12, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Teleforce

In case you didn't get around to actually reading it, the page at Teleforce is a joke. The sources are questionable and half the links are dead, and the article is full of speculative, unverifiable claims and original research. I'm surprised that someone can get that sort of crap past the radar in the first place, let alone that editors will actually work to make sure it stays there. So what can I do to get rid of stagnant, rubbish articles short of dedicating myself to writing an equally expansive new article with which to replace it? The talk page is clearly useless, and cutting out large chunks of the article is branded vandalism regardless of how low the quality of the article is to begin with. I shouldn't have to wait for a power user with some sense to come along and remove content that obviously doesn't belong.--203.206.115.8 (talk) 15:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok well, I've looked over it and read it a few times. From what I can see is that your making legitimate edits. I'm sorry to of labeled you incorrectly in this case. I guess I should slow down a bit. Thank you for the notification. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 15:08, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Excuse me...

But i am not vandalizing. Merely leaving a message.--Banging pots and pans (talk) 20:38, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Writing pot pot bang bang or whatever it was on a page is considered vandalism. Please stop before you are blocked for vandalism. ToxicWasteGrounds 20:40, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The user clearly didn't want you to leave that message on there page. Reverted and Warned. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 20:43, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

(Now blocked for 12 hours Chzz ► 21:48, 1 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks

...for reverting my user-page when vandalized. Chzz ► 21:48, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

13 amend

ssry...i changed it again...ill change it bak to original form Davidking360 (talk) 00:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No Problem. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 00:56, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: user:Rfhnrjftvjmv

I think user:Rfhnrjftvjmv might be a sockpuppet of the deletekey that we reverted on the delete key article. --Morenooso (talk) 02:24, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Been reported. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 02:25, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Also requested temp full protection. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 02:26, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

As a sockpuppet? I have your talkpage on Watch. You can respond here. --Morenooso (talk) 02:28, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nah I didn't open a sockpuppet investigation. But clearly those 3 accounts where socks. They all got indef blocked and the page got protected. I think its fine now but take it how you like. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 02:44, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Megafauna

Thanks for the feedback. I've added a more friendly note[1], since my comment about megafauna was obviously lost in the templated message. First Light (talk) 02:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Left message on your page. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 02:59, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

And I over-used the vandalism template in that case, period, since they were possibly good faith edits, so thanks again. First Light (talk) 03:07, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then again, I just went looking to see if there were other critters mis-categorized, and found User talk:125.164.2.93 (same IP range) has been down this road before. But still, better to err next time on the side of assuming good faith. First Light (talk)

Thanks!

		The Userpage Shield
		Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage! Bramble claw x 20:50, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, Thank you! :D Userpaged! --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 00:12, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

I've just come here to say the same thing as the barnstar (actually my talk page) . Award seconded! Ty 10:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PC power management - reverted changes

Hello. You revereted changes with the comment "seems like a link spam". I made contribution to a table with exatly same fields as other 6 or 7 references. If you consider that my contribution is a spam, why did you keep other contribution? Is a free encyclopedia or not? I just added information relevant to the topic using the same pattern as others. So it can't be considered as a spam.

I didn't see anything also a previous editor saw it was link spam so I joined in. --[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]] ([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]] :: [[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 15:31, 13 May 2010 (UTC)