Jump to content

User talk:Rio de Janiero God

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rio de Janiero God (talk | contribs) at 16:05, 14 September 2010 (→‎Template:2009 films). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Spider-man 3, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.-5- (talk) 17:35, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3rd opinion request regarding Spider-Man 3

I've been asked to look at Spider-Man 3 regarding the section on the aborted sequel and the reboot film. I've posted my comments at Talk:Spider-Man 3#3rd opinion on sequel/reboot section.

I would strongly suggest all editors involved with this section address the issue there instead of continuing to edit war on the article regarding the section.

- J Greb (talk) 19:00, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:23, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010 (2)

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Spider-Man 3. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 13:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Spider-Man (film series). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.-5- (talk) 23:22, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I enjoy maintaining articles. Please provide a source where Raimi discussed that, because so far you haven't.-5- (talk) 23:29, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User_talk:-5-. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 23:42, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing information

Just to be clear on a few points:

  • When you add information to an article, it should be sourced to a reliable and verifiable source.
  • The source you point to must support the entire statement you are basing from it.
  • Forum threads are very rarely considered reliable.
  • Forum threads positing fan speculation are never considered reliable.

So, if you are adding information as fact to an article:

  • Provide the source you are basing it on. Do not be surprised if an unsourced statement is removed.
  • Do not interpret the information. If you feel you have to do this, do not add the information.
  • If the source includes a forum section, do not use the forum posts. If only the forum posts would support the information you want to add, do not add it.
  • If another editor were to verify the information against the source and would find it not to be supported, do not be surprised when the information is removed.
  • If the information comes from an unreliable source or a forum, do not be surprised if it is removed.

Also... Do not edit war, as you have been with Spider-Man (film series), to include information that is either unsourced or not supported by the source you point to. Doing so is a form of disruptive editing. Continuing to do it, either on one article or as a preferred method of editing across multiple articles, can and likely will result in your ability to edit Wikipedia being suspended for a time.

- J Greb (talk) 00:08, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

X-Men: First Class (film)

Judging from what you were doing in other articles. You and -5- could start another edit war on this article. I do recommend you discuss your disagreements on the discussion page of that article instead of undoing edits the majority of time. Thank you. Jhenderson 777 15:25, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd go a bit further than that. Since the cited ref supports what -5- reverted to, that text is valid even if you don't like it. If you are going to alter text that is based on a cited source:
  1. Check the source to make sure the text in the article is or isn't supported.
  2. Provide an edit summary as to why you are changing the text.
  3. If your edit is disputed, take it to the talk page.
The edit you made to X-Men: First Class (film) appeared to be capricious, at best. But in conjunction with reverting a spelling correction and filing an unfounded vandalism report against an editor you are edit warring with, speak to bigger problems. Right now I think it would serve you well to read over:
At the very least.
- J Greb (talk) 18:35, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to The Avengers film project, you may be blocked from editing. Xeworlebi (talk) 13:40, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not blanking, merely changing the way the article is written, it's not a planned cast, it's a CONFIRMED cast. Rio de Janiero God (talk) 10:41, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Then change the section header, but you removed all the information and the references and left a mere list of the cast. Besides since production hasn't started everything is still planned. Xeworlebi (talk) 13:45, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
-_-, almost half the film pages on wikipedia do that. Rio de Janiero God (talk) 10:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Even if that were true that wouldn't make it proper. Doniago (talk) 13:53, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) In a character section perhaps, where they talk about the characters, not where they discuss the cast and casting. Deleting information and references is not constructive editing, and will be reverted. Xeworlebi (talk) 13:58, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Rio de Janiero God. You have new messages at Xeworlebi's talk page.
Message added 18:41, 10 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Wraning regarding editing conduct

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

This is based on your continued editing practices on X-Men: First Class (film) and The Avengers film project.

You have been given more than adequate warning about removing sourced information, altering text to disagree with sources, providing unsourced information, and edit warring to keep you changes in lieu of discussion.

Additionally, this edit show the start of hounding another editor just to undo their edits. Unexplained or unreasonable reverting in this vein will also get you blocked.

- J Greb (talk) 20:02, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of American superhero films. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.-5- (talk) 20:29, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Christopher Nolan, you may be blocked from editing. -5- (talk) 20:31, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted you again at Deaths in January 2007. We usually do not keep redlinked articles on the Deaths lists, because essentially having an article is the benchmark for notability for lists. Please do not reinstate your change. You can create articles on those two personages if you can establish notability, though. Once they are no longer redlinked, we'd be happy to include them on the deaths list. Thanks! Syrthiss (talk) 14:51, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rio_de_Janiero_God&oldid=384810951"