User talk:72.234.207.192

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:58, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I Thought You Were Boycotting Wikipedia!

Hi Rich,

Didn't you loudly and publicly proclaim that you were boycotting Wikipedia in your blog? I guess I have mixed feelings about your return. On the one hand, your boisterously antagonistic personal attacks on other editors are clearly against Wikipedia policies. One the other hand, you do provide some nice comic relief! Cheers, Ebikeguy (talk) 16:30, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Voceditenore. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:17, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, 72.234.207.192. You have new messages at 28bytes's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, 72.234.207.192. You have new messages at Eagles247's talk page.
Message added 19:30, 6 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Back on the block

You were blocked for six months, and that time has not yet expired. You, the person are blocked, under any identity or ip address. Therefore I have blocked this ip, resetting the six month period to begin today due to your block evasion and obvious inability to conform to even the most basic standards of civil behavior.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

APPEAL BLOCK

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

72.234.207.192 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Says Zubaty: My story is simple. I am using the same computer in the same location I used six months ago. And I assumed, because editing was working, that I was unblocked. It's not three months or four months or five months. It's right on the cusp of six months. I didn't do anything tricky. I just started up my computer and started editing again. So I figured I was unblocked. Why is Beeblebrox so vindictive? That's the real question. Is free speech only for those who agree with him? Why can't he just leave me alone and stop harassing me? Nobody else who fielded my questions in the past week made an issue out of this. It was entirely unintentional. I started out sending editorial suggestions to Lew Loot because I figured I was still blocked, but one day, when I tried editing, it worked. I was unblocked! Come on. Play baseball. Be reasonable. I didn't try to get away with anything. It’s the accusation that I did something sleazy that is completely vindictive and out of line. No warning. No nothing. He just blocked me for six months again! If I am blocked now why was I unblocked a few days ago? It’s senseless. That’s your glitch, not mine. It’s not even an honest mistake. It’s NO mistake. I wasn’t blocked three days ago. You want me to wear a yellow Star of David too? Or use separate water fountains? God, I feel like I’m living under apartheid with people like this.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Says Zubaty: My story is simple. I am using the same computer in the same location I used six months ago. And I assumed, because editing was working, that I was unblocked. It's not three months or four months or five months.  It's right on the cusp of six months. I didn't do anything tricky. I just started up my computer and started editing again. So I figured I was unblocked. Why is Beeblebrox so vindictive? That's the real question. Is free speech only for those who agree with him? Why can't he just leave me alone and stop harassing me? Nobody else who fielded my questions in the past week made an issue out of this. It was entirely unintentional. I started out sending editorial suggestions to Lew Loot because I figured I was still blocked, but one day, when I tried editing, it worked. I was unblocked! Come on. Play baseball. Be reasonable. I didn't try to get away with anything. It’s the accusation that I did something sleazy that is completely vindictive and out of line. No warning. No nothing. He just blocked me for six months again! If I am blocked now why was I unblocked a few days ago? It’s senseless. That’s your glitch, not mine. It’s not even an honest mistake. It’s NO mistake. I wasn’t blocked three days ago. You want me to wear a yellow Star of David too? Or use separate water fountains? God, I feel like I’m living under apartheid with people like this. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Says Zubaty: My story is simple. I am using the same computer in the same location I used six months ago. And I assumed, because editing was working, that I was unblocked. It's not three months or four months or five months.  It's right on the cusp of six months. I didn't do anything tricky. I just started up my computer and started editing again. So I figured I was unblocked. Why is Beeblebrox so vindictive? That's the real question. Is free speech only for those who agree with him? Why can't he just leave me alone and stop harassing me? Nobody else who fielded my questions in the past week made an issue out of this. It was entirely unintentional. I started out sending editorial suggestions to Lew Loot because I figured I was still blocked, but one day, when I tried editing, it worked. I was unblocked! Come on. Play baseball. Be reasonable. I didn't try to get away with anything. It’s the accusation that I did something sleazy that is completely vindictive and out of line. No warning. No nothing. He just blocked me for six months again! If I am blocked now why was I unblocked a few days ago? It’s senseless. That’s your glitch, not mine. It’s not even an honest mistake. It’s NO mistake. I wasn’t blocked three days ago. You want me to wear a yellow Star of David too? Or use separate water fountains? God, I feel like I’m living under apartheid with people like this. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Says Zubaty: My story is simple. I am using the same computer in the same location I used six months ago. And I assumed, because editing was working, that I was unblocked. It's not three months or four months or five months.  It's right on the cusp of six months. I didn't do anything tricky. I just started up my computer and started editing again. So I figured I was unblocked. Why is Beeblebrox so vindictive? That's the real question. Is free speech only for those who agree with him? Why can't he just leave me alone and stop harassing me? Nobody else who fielded my questions in the past week made an issue out of this. It was entirely unintentional. I started out sending editorial suggestions to Lew Loot because I figured I was still blocked, but one day, when I tried editing, it worked. I was unblocked! Come on. Play baseball. Be reasonable. I didn't try to get away with anything. It’s the accusation that I did something sleazy that is completely vindictive and out of line. No warning. No nothing. He just blocked me for six months again! If I am blocked now why was I unblocked a few days ago? It’s senseless. That’s your glitch, not mine. It’s not even an honest mistake. It’s NO mistake. I wasn’t blocked three days ago. You want me to wear a yellow Star of David too? Or use separate water fountains? God, I feel like I’m living under apartheid with people like this. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

72.234.207.192 (talk) 07:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.