Talk:.476 Enfield
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
![]() | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in England may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
![]() | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Canada may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
![]() | A fact from .476 Enfield appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 December 2008, and was viewed approximately 2,276 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Mass and Muzzle Velocity
What was the muzzle-energy of the .476 compared to the .455?
Oh, Canada
I tagged WP Canada & WP LEO, since the .476 Enfield Mk 1 revolver was a NWMP weapon. TREKphiler hit me ♠ 05:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- I removed the WP Canada tag, as the connection is very minor. PKT(alk) 16:50, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- Not if somebody can get a pic here... TREKphiler hit me ♠ 01:08, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- Re-removed the WP Canada tag, this article is not within the scope of the project. PKT(alk) 16:14, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
.455 Webley
There appear to be some discrepancies between this article and that for the .455 Webley concerning loadings for the latter (I am not expert in such matters.) — Robert Greer (talk) 21:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Added some there; hope that addresses the issue. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 19:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Romans
Changed Arabic numerals for Mark variations to Roman numerals. British nomenclature did not use Arabic numerals for Marks until after WW II, well past the time when this cartridge was in service. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.4.142.104 (talk) 16:37, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- You also changed them in the source titles, whichi is a wrong change. Also, you could (should) have simply said this in the edit summary. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 19:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Start-Class Firearms articles
- Unknown-importance Firearms articles
- Wikipedia requested images of firearms
- WikiProject Firearms articles
- Unassessed United Kingdom articles
- Unknown-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- Stub-Class military history articles
- Stub-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- Stub-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in England
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Canada
- Wikipedia Did you know articles