This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article seemed to have become an advert for this company, but taking it back to something more encyclopedic seems to have just been reverted by a series of Anons/new users. On checking their edit records, there seems a clear case of WP:COI here. Tags applied. --Trident13 (talk) 12:10, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
COI
Dear all,
I will not hide the fact that I have a close connection to E&V. Many of my reverts are due to the fact that I have access to correct info and some parts were adapted incorrectly. Some edits also removed large parts of the article, due to those removals the article lost a great part of its value. This does not mean that I have not made some mistakes such as reverting the relocation of links to a new section called "external links". But do understand my close watch on the page due to the fact that the first page I tried to make was adapted, adjusted, ... by my competitors and therefor later-on also removed.
I am always open to critic, to help me further adapt the article into an as neutral possible point of view as I am off course still a wikipedia noob. Nick De Clercq 12:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
