User talk:Texcarson

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Texcarson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i suspended the legal action, there won't be anything to fear

Decline reason:

None of us are afraid of your legal action, but since you vandalized a page and asked for all edits you've made to be removed, I'm not sure why you would want an active account. It doesn't sound as if you want to continue editing Wikipedia. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:12, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Texcarson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm trying once again to get unblocked. When i find ideas i will add pages, images and links. Also read the above

Decline reason:

Generally, when somebody replaces the content of our policy against legal threats with a legal threat, that mean they're done with Wikipedia and have no intent to continue contributing constructively. If you're to persuade an admin that unblocking you isn't a risk, you're going to have to work considerably harder. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:45, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Texcarson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

But i changed my mind! No threats and no complaints, they're not useful anyway. So what's the risk for you? I have 2000 good edits according to the counter, and i said i want to link pages and images when needed. I'm still working at commons as well. Texcarson (talk) 16:57, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The risk for us is that we have no idea what prompted this apparently sudden turn into disruptive editing in the first place, and your requests here are not convincing that we won't see it again. "When i find ideas i will add pages, images and links" is very vague and doesn't actually tell us what edits you intend to make. Asking us what the risk to us isn't helpful either; that's for you to tell us, and 2000 edits does not explain why you came back after several months to make a clearly disruptive edit and ask for the deletion of your userpages. I'm very curious in that, as from what I can see it looks like your account was compromised. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 18:23, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Texcarson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

But Hersfold, it's just that the computer kind of flipped out back then while i was logged using two browser windows at the same time, and what i jokingly typed in the box was accidentally saved creating the bad edit, it was a mistake... i'm not a frequent visitor here, i just add links and image, but i still had to say that the "accidental threat" was retracted.

Decline reason:

That explanation might be plausible if your next edit - I mean right away edit - was reverting yourself with the edit summary "Whoops". Even then, you may have been blocked. But you've offered three different versions of what happened and why, and none of them are convincing. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 21:51, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You said that you had changed your mind- but now you say that you never meant it at all. Changing your story doesn't give me more faith. I suspect the real Texcarson is probably long gone. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:22, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You may not be frequent, but you have had 2 blocks under your first user name, followed by 4 blocks as User:Texcarson - hardly the record of a occasional editor. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:33, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good point- maybe this is the real Texcarson after all. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:39, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Texcarson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes it's me, so what's the problem? It's really me! I mean what the hell are you saying? I have over 9000 good edits at itwiki

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Yes it's me, so what's the problem? It's really me! I mean what the hell are you saying? I have over 9000 good edits at itwiki |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Yes it's me, so what's the problem? It's really me! I mean what the hell are you saying? I have over 9000 good edits at itwiki |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Yes it's me, so what's the problem? It's really me! I mean what the hell are you saying? I have over 9000 good edits at itwiki |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}