Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trail Bologna

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jshisler1 (talk | contribs) at 18:39, 14 January 2011. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Trail Bologna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable product, bordering on promotion. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:24, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Don't say "it needs more references" unless you can prove that more exist. I see the same thing happen every time someone says "keep but expand with more sources". The article then gets a crapflood of "keep but source more" !votes, it gets kept, and then no one ever gets around to adding the sources. Most of the time this is because someone will say "it needs more sources" but there truly are none. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:30, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My keep is based on the number of Google hits and mentions, since the delete was for notability. I then stated that the article needs more sources, which I didn't see on the web. With an older, regional company, they may be in book form or elsewhere. Please note, that I didn't vote, "Keep, but expand", nor did I say WP:ITSNOTABLE; I provided a concrete, verifiable reason for my vote. You can certainly feel free to disagree. SeaphotoTalk 22:45, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]