User talk:SLSQK

Welcome

Welcome!

Hi SLSQK! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least some of your recent edits, such as the ones you made to Integrative medicine, appeared to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Brangifer (talk) 20:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Integrative medicine. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Please read about the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (BRD). When your content has been reverted, YOU must initiate or participate in discussion about the matter on the talk page, and you must not restore the content until a consensus decision about its fate has been reached with other editors. -- Brangifer (talk) 22:18, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Bravewell (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 13:09, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

SLSQK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should not be blocked, it is legal to have more than one account and the edits by that I reverted were negative and not true.SLSQK (talk) 13:54, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I should not be blocked, it is legal to have more than one account and the edits by that I reverted were negative and not true.[[User:SLSQK|SLSQK]] ([[User talk:SLSQK#top|talk]]) 13:54, 23 February 2011 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= I should not be blocked, it is legal to have more than one account and the edits by that I reverted were negative and not true.[[User:SLSQK|SLSQK]] ([[User talk:SLSQK#top|talk]]) 13:54, 23 February 2011 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= I should not be blocked, it is legal to have more than one account and the edits by that I reverted were negative and not true.[[User:SLSQK|SLSQK]] ([[User talk:SLSQK#top|talk]]) 13:54, 23 February 2011 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}