User talk:Andyjsmith
|
|||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
New York Food Tours
Hello Andyjsmith. I noticed that you tagged the article New York Food Tours for speedy deletion. I sincerely want to create the page and would really appreciate it if you could help me make it better. What changes could I make so that the article may stay up? Thank you very much. Superdeed (talk) 22:21, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
February 2011
Hi Andyjsmith. Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I just wanted to inform you that I declined to delete Elizabeth Obisanya, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion because of the following concern: the criterion you used does not cover this kind of page or the reason you specified is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion and especially what is considered non-criteria. In future you should rather tag such pages for proposed deletion or start an appropriate deletion discussion. There seems to be enough potential notability hidden in among the mess of an article... UtherSRG (talk) 10:53, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Bah... stupid template... you get the point though... - UtherSRG (talk) 10:54, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Sure. I had a look for notability but darned if I could see it. Prodding instead. andy (talk) 10:55, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) I'll have a little go at WP:wikifying the article. --Shirt58 (talk) 11:07, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Twiddled my decoder ring, and it turns out it was an attack page. Well done you for picking up on it in the first place. --Shirt58 (talk) 10:16, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) I'll have a little go at WP:wikifying the article. --Shirt58 (talk) 11:07, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Sure. I had a look for notability but darned if I could see it. Prodding instead. andy (talk) 10:55, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
User-page frolics
Hi Andy. I just wanted to thank you for reverting the vandalism on my "offensive" user-page. Cute vandal, though. I guess I rather walked into that! Haploidavey (talk) 12:55, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome andy (talk) 12:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Hoax
Would you mind informing me why Konstantin Chterev bolivian general has been deleted?
- Because it's a silly hoax. andy (talk) 16:25, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
I appreciate the peer review, could you please be more specific?
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You caught me at a bad time but I believe with more citations you will see it's all non-OR. गीता Brother Can You Spare A Dime - Unsparingly correcting prejudicial POV edits
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Taking your point but requesting maintenance of original deadline and guidance on options to proceed.Brothercanyouspareadime (talk) 23:51, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Eric
Regarding "Norby Test". I can't get back to you until after February. School is out until then, no I'm not in school, but using a computer that is tied to the school schedule. I've stopped the speedy deletion until then. But will comply with you after some discussion. Yes. It is my own research, and clearly doesn't match Wiki's requirements. Please work with me if you can help. Thanks.
However, I'm not able to publish it anywhere else. My hope here was to garner some discussion from higher up, than I've been able to access, and if there is any problems to quitely remove it myself. However, if it is a valid viewpoint it should be published for the AI people to use and reflect on. I'm sorry that I have no other way of protecting my own work at the present time. Please let me know if you have an alternate way of protecting, my idea's, that are within my abilities.
Eric Norby (talk) 01:21, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but the reasons you state - your own research, unpublished - are precisely the reasons why it is not suitable for wikipedia. It's all explained at WP:OR. andy (talk) 10:37, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Your speedy on this was perfectly justified, but enough has been added to the article since to escape A7, so I have de-speedied it. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:46, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
I didn't catch it until now, but thanks for the backup on Zionist Occupation Government.
kind regards, --UnicornTapestry (talk) 19:32, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome. andy (talk) 23:01, 28 February 2011 (UTC)