Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hill jumping

Hill jumping

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has had no sources and has been tagged as such since July 2007. It makes several very dubious claims, and falls under WP:NFT. I can find no evidence that the term "yumping" has been used to describe this activity and in any case Wikipedia is not a dictionary. -- Selket ^Talk 01:57, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agree with nom. Seems to be an attempt at a WP:DICDEF without the aid of reliable sources. Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 02:16, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - specialized sport jargon. Non-reliable sources leave this in the delete bucket.

Merge with rallying. Clearly most of the references in the page refer to that sport, so it's fine as a section in that article. Steven Walling 02:33, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 03:11, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as dicdef... although I have to say when I first read the article's name, my mind somehow transposed the H and the J... Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:47, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article says nothing interesting, and although Wikipedia is not a dictionary, 'Hill Jumping' hardly needs defining, even if WP were. ARDawson (talk) 11:02, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]