User talk:Vidovler

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aram-van for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:23, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This investigation turned out negative; I apologize for any problems. We just thought temporarily that you might be the same person as another user who is banned on Wikipedia. You have no reason to worry from here on though. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:21, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

tks

Welcome!

Hello, Vidovler! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:21, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

thank you.

WTF! Why am I blocked! I don't care to what he has reverted to, I have reverted to him! http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagorno-Karabakh_War&action=historysubmit&diff=423927061&oldid=423706401 It was identical to the other editor, checking article history makes that clear!!! Also, this is not true: Vidovler came very soon after this sock person User:Mark Barsky was at last denied many times to be unblocked by admins. I have finals and am not contributing, just checking the recent edits. Its not because another editor was blocked that I should be careful and wait before making an edit!

Why can I only edit this page, how am I supposed to defend myself when I can't even contact the person who blocked me? What? Am I supposed to wait until someone visit my talkpage? Vidovler (talk) 00:10, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anyone reading this?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Vidovler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Accept reason:

Although you have a similar point of view to the user of the other account involved, it does indeed seem that the charge of sockpuppetry is based purely on the fact that you undid a revert of that account's edit, which is minimal evidence. Also your account existed before the other one was even created. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:19, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the other editor, someone filed an accusation against me, and I was blocked 15 minutes later, without being able to defend myself. The accusation is not accurate. See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagorno-Karabakh_War&action=historysubmit&diff=423927061&oldid=423706401 you can see that I only reverted on edit out of several edits which were reverted from both sides for days, because the others, both side had arguments for their version. Why should I be careful to edit, if someone else has reverted. It makes no sense for me to wait a day to revert. See this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagorno-Karabakh_War&action=historysubmit&diff=423727577&oldid=423685542 Does this mean they are the same user? It's true I did not edit that much, but I had my finals, so I keep myself updated by checking other editors contribution.

Also, why would I use another account, when mine is not blocked and that I could have reverted with it?

Nonetheless, I've blocked the account. These two edits are identical, so something is going on. — HelloAnnyong

This is not true, my edit was identical to another user http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagorno-Karabakh_War&action=historysubmit&diff=423927061&oldid=423706401 the blocked user happened to revert to the same users version.

Thank you, thank you, thank you! :) But there seem to be a problem, I can't still edit. :(