User talk:Mato - Wikipedia

User:Mato


User	Talk

Please leave a new message.

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7

Account on sh.wiki

It is free. --OC Ripper (talk) 07:58, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. Mato (talk) 11:46, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good Faith

The edit was described as Gratuitous. "Gratuitous" explains the edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.195.97.215 (talk) 20:25, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You could say that about anything. It might be best to explain why you think that in the future. Mato (talk) 20:29, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you being argumentative? You claimed that there was "no explanation." 74.195.97.215 (talk) 20:57, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure where you got that quote from, but you're right, I should apologise - I used a template which implied that you had not entered an edit summary, which you did. I will therefore remove it from your talk page. I should, instead, have placed a message saying that your edit summary was insufficient. Mato (talk) 21:02, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY: Here is a more fully developed explanation for you. Wikipedia's alleged good faith policy (I have not found it to be true) is not relevant to the definition of bona fides (i.e., good faith). It would be like writing an entry about "great guy" and then using myself as an example of what constitutes a great guy. As previously stated, it is gratuitous (i.e., without apparent reason or justification).

Santiago Muñez

Would you like to have a look at that revert you made to Santiago Muñez - I'd just reverted further and I think we edit conflicted and you've inadvertently re-added some invalid content. This is a fictional character isn't it? —SMALL JIM 21:27, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well would you look at that! Yes it seems we edit conflicted and I reverted to a poor revision, completely missing the fact that it is a fictional character. Sorry I should have been more careful there - thanks for pointing it out. Mato (talk) 21:35, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - thanks for your good work fighting those vandals. —SMALL JIM 21:43, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mato@cs.wiki

I renamed your account Tomayres to (usurped account) Mato as requested. Enjoy contributing to cs.wikipedia. --Tchoř (talk) 00:20, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Mato (talk) 00:33, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BRazil-China relations

Hi, I changed a table, but did something wrong... Can you make the tekst below come out of the table? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JanHop (talk • contribs) 14:17, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The entire section has been removed by another editor because there were no sources. If you wish to re-add the information, you must provide references. Mato (talk) 14:19, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More particularly, he has to add references that actually support the material. The Brazil factsheet does not do so. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk(P) 15:26, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, should have made that a bit clearer. Mato (talk) 15:28, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

And you reverted my revert of vandalism.... why?Roodog2k (talk) 14:32, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Because I hate you and I love vandals~~. A quick look at my contributions would tell you that it was likely accidental. Furthermore it would tell you that I explained my mistake on Vrenator's talk page, the editor who reverted my revert. Mato (talk) 14:38, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

K Roodog2k (talk) 14:42, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

what did I do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by LFCBAFC (talk • contribs) 17:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You added unsourced information to Andrew Nicholas (see WP:CITE) and nicknames for the college principal at Barrow-in-Furness Sixth Form College, which is considered vandalism. Mato (talk) 17:04, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks

Long time since I used Wiki and forgot about internal referencing! Apologies —Preceding unsigned comment added by Icpemwebmaster (talk • contribs) 18:07, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Mato (talk) 18:10, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

it.wiki Mato

it.wiki username Mato is now available for your SUL account. Ciao, Ary29 (talk) 16:43, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. Mato (talk) 16:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Usurp in huwiki

Sorry for the late answer, renaming is done. Regards. - RepliCarter (talk) 08:26, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Thank you for your help. Mato (talk) 10:07, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ja:User:Mato usurped

Today I usurped ja:User:Mato for you at Japanese Wikipedia as per your request. Thank you for your patience. Happy editing! --Kanjy (talk) 06:31, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your help. Mato (talk) 13:14, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arman Cagle

Hello, Mato. You have new messages at Arman Cagle's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

User talk:Jimbo Wales

This also needs to be revdeleted.Jasper Deng (talk) 00:10, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - were you asking me to put in a request because you're not sure how to go about it? As a thread was started at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#User:Jimbo_Wales I've brought it up there. Mato (talk) 00:28, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Slp1 has fixed. Mato (talk) 00:37, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ACC

Hello Mato, I was wondering if you were aware of IRC (Internet Relay Chat). The account creation team monitors a channel here #wikipedia-en-accounts ^connect. We use this "tool" to be alerted by a bot of incoming requests and if needed ask questions and get advice of the team or help of a tool administrator on odd or tricky request. Also we have a mailing list used to communicate with users submitting request, daily status reports and such. You may subscribe to the list here. Hope to see you around.
Mlpearc powwow 00:43, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mlpearc, I was planning on messaging you today but I see you got here first! Thanks for the advice Re: IRC - I will make sure I make that my first point of call in the future. As I wasn't on IRC last night, however, can I ask you to elaborate on your decision concerning User:Trelon2? It didn't seem to me like a situation where one could assume good faith. Mato (talk) 12:21, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have been thinking most of this morning about how to answer your question. To me AGF is a absolute constant, every request comes in with the highest AGF status (IMHO). I see every request as "create" it is only after some hard un-reputable information is found do I even think of not creating, in fact I honestly believe I have not turned down a request because of vandalism (I have not yet seen a request come in with habitual vandalism). Judging request and how to handle request come with experience, the more you do, the more confident of your decisions become. I hope this isn't rambling and of some help to you. I feel I may have not answered your direct question but, I hope it explains a small part of helping in the front line.
Mlpearc powwow 19:29, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No it's of great use. I haven't been around at ACC very long, and naturally the Guide can't cover what to do in every single situation. If the normal procedure is to assume "create" unless there's any kind of issue considered 'major' at hand (in terms of contribs), then I completely understand - and I know how to deal with similar requests in the future. I will also ensure I request for comment at IRC if I am at all unsure - and thanks for your reply and help! Mato (talk) 23:27, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]