Talk:Stonefield (band)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Australia: Music Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal Stonefield (band) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

External links Section

WP:ELNO point 10 is very clear about links to be avoided. Any editor wishing to re-add them or add more please make your case why we should ignore this central guideline and await a consensus before you add them. Mtking (talk)

Urm, the note on under the WP:ELNO heading contradicts the points within the policy itself "Except for a link to an official page of the article's subject", to me seems one should be used rather then all of them. All of the links were official but do think one of the five should only be used. Another point is why do we have these templates if point 10 says otherwise? Bidgee (talk) 05:37, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ELNO also clearly states "Except for a link to an official page of the article's subject..." The band does not currently have a dedicated website, so the provided links ARE the official links to their pages. These are the links people follow to get information directly from the band, and therefore they are valid.--Rowie235 (talk) 05:40, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I say at least leave the facebook link. This is their main platform at this time.--Rowie235 (talk) 05:41, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm - The band does not have an official website, that says a lot about the bands management, in that case I think it is ok (until the bands management gets it's act in order) to have either the facebook or myspace one listed, my pref would be for MySpace. Mtking (talk) 05:49, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They only recently started getting a lot of attention. I'm sure a website is on their list. As for the myspace, barely anyone uses myspace anymore, and the band posts on facebook and twitter constantly.--Rowie235 (talk) 05:53, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]