Jump to content

Talk:The Kyle and Jackie O Show

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Brewhahaha (talk | contribs) at 00:23, 5 July 2011 (→‎Sources, copy-editing and clean up warnings no longer necessary). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconAustralia Unassessed
WikiProject iconThe Kyle and Jackie O Show is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
WikiProject iconRadio Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
To-do List:

Requested move

The Kyle & Jackie O ShowThe Kyle and Jackie O Show – The name of the program uses "and" and not &. MOS also recommends the use of "and" rather then "&". Bidgee (talk) 02:03, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sources, copy-editing and clean up warnings no longer necessary

Have changed headings to fit Wikipedia's basic copyediting protocols. Have also double-checked all sources, thus the "issues" at the top of the page are no longer necessary (because they've been addressed and changed) - yay! Cheers Brewhahaha (talk) 00:07, 30 June 2011 (UTC)Brewhahaha[reply]

Problem is it needs more sources, secondary sources (news sources) should be used over primary sources (which is Kyle amd Jackie O Show), the whole article needs a clean-up and rewrite since it isn't at an encyclopaedic standard, it is more of a fan/advert type article with little if any balance (controversy). Bidgee (talk) 00:17, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree about the sources, I just looked over the reference list and the majority of the sources are secondary. This is one of the most detailed and referenced articles in the world of radio. The article has a whole section dedicated to controversy (thus balancing the article). I respectfully don't find your criticism valied Brewhahaha (talk) 00:23, 5 July 2011 (UTC)brewhahaha[reply]