User talk:Raintheone

Hollyoaks animated

Hollyoaks: Animated appeared yesterday and the creator of the youtube vids has basically made it. It's not notable and some don't even get 100 views. I've nominated for deletion is there anything else we can do before then? Like to get it deleted faster or should we just redirect it? It's no way affiliated to c4 or hollyoaks and is complete fanfic and looks stupid D4nnyw14 (talk) 17:59, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

It will get deleted if no one contests it. I'm sure an admin will notice it is written like an advertisement and non notable. Don't think there is a faster way than speedy deletion. Though I know some admins can "nuke" pages. Lets wait and see. Thanks for the Rae advice too, I'll also look to see if there are any other characterisation refs... if not I'll nominate it.RaintheOne ^BAM 18:16, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Realised could use speedy deletion so ignore this. I've looked for Rae refs for characterisation and there seem to be non at all. Non from tabloids or anywhere reallyD4nnyw14 (talk) 18:18, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

User is ridiculous. How insane do you need to be to think an article about a youtube video series that doesn't even get 100 views sometimes is noteworthy enough to need a list of cast page and then separate pages for it! It's his own work and is trying to self promote but it's pissing me off. Users like this that don't even reply on talk pages are nothing but annoying vandals.D4nnyw14 (talk) 18:45, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

When I'm done with the Xfactor, I'll see if we can get all of this shifted. I agree - it pisses me off too. They all need nuking and the editor dealt with.RaintheOne ^BAM 18:59, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for making me smile on the 'Animated' talk page. I agree so much. It shouldn't be so easy for people to add bullshit but if new pages had to be passed it'd take forever.D4nnyw14 (talk) 19:01, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

There we go - all deleted. Lets hope they don't make more.RaintheOne ^BAM 20:50, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

HO

Hey, i've just finished Rae's section on Silas's article. I am doing an other storylines one (including where he was palnning to strangle Nancy) and I was wondering if you have think link to a Hollyoaks teaser video where Silas was talking about Mercedes and then walking up behind her) as I want to put that in about the candle stick and Jen Metcalfe's comment about it in an interview with ds.--AcidBrights (talk) 18:19, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Yea thats what I was asking lol I do go on a bit! :) Thanks--AcidBrights (talk) 19:02, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Oliver GAN

Hey Rain! If you get chance tonight, could you please take a look at the GAN for Ollie? There are just a couple of small wording issues to take care of, but my connection is being temperamental as hell (think standing on one leg by the window to get a signal haha) but I really need to finish up a copyedit elsewhere I promised would be done by Sunday. If not, no worries, I'll get on it when I'm out of the wilderness and not being disconnected every 5 minutes. Cheers! Frickative 23:55, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

It has been so long I didn't think to look. Sure I will. Tonight or tomorrow. :)RaintheOne ^BAM 00:10, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks very much Rain, you're a star! Frickative 00:34, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Message

At DS when you get a chance to read it. Don't know how often you check so thought i'd notify you. Thanks D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:07, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Neighbours

How would you put them - [1] - in the cast list? Lol. Oh, and didn't Hollyoaks announce something similar a while ago? - JuneGloom Talk 16:43, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Ha ha, just seen this - [2]. I lost my internet connection earlier, just as I realised the IP is Tom. - JuneGloom Talk 20:04, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

It was the most friendly way of saying what I'd like to say. =) So he is socking? SPI? I left a message on your talk btw.RaintheOne ^BAM 22:15, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

He's just come straight off a block and started making exactly the same edits that he was blocked for. I think AIV is a better place to report him. I'll go reply to your message on my talk page. - JuneGloom Talk 22:55, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Okeydokie .. & Oh I see. You are right, just as bad as before, but does use talk pages now - though that isn't a plus.RaintheOne ^BAM 23:22, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Reported Tom to AIV, did you see his confession about being a sock on his talk page? - JuneGloom Talk 19:45, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Why he admitted it IDK - he cannot think he can stay now, I mean it is not like he changed his ways either. Still as opposed to the guidelines as he ever was.RaintheOne ^BAM 20:10, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Lincoln Lewis' casting has been announced, think this can go to the mainspace soon. - JuneGloom Talk 16:34, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Could you take a quick break from filling up my watchlist and just read over Kyle's lead for me? The last paragraph was a bitch. :) - JuneGloom Talk 14:35, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

I love the new pics, especially Lou's one! - JuneGloom Talk 11:41, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Just letting you know, Digital Spy is now published by Hearst Magazines UK. - JuneGloom Talk 13:28, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Have you just discovered Yahoo's soaps section? - JuneGloom Talk 20:31, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Sophie's going to need a new picture when this - [3] - storyline kicks off, lol. JuneGloom Talk 19:40, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Just noticed that Sunset Beach AFD. If you check Sarah G. Buxton's page, I think you can use the fourth ref for Annie's article. I'm not doing anything at the moment, so I might take on Virginia if I can find some sources. - JuneGloom Talk 19:26, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Sent you an email, btw. - JuneGloom Talk 00:13, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

HO

Thanks for the articles :) --AcidBrights (talk) 16:35, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Yea, i'm planning to redo the whole article in my sandbox, as the one in the main space just keeps getting random edits which are unreferenced etc. Yea, i'm planning to do every section for every character, it may take me a while but I have till basically the end of the year if need be, because I don't think any of the newer characters will have their own articles, unless they have really big storylines.--AcidBrights (talk) 20:31, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Yeah maybe, if I get round to their articles soon, i'm doing the Silas article at the same time, so i'll be juggling them both.--AcidBrights (talk) 21:12, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I was just wondering did you find that link to do with Silas and Mercedes or not?--AcidBrights (talk) 12:53, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

HO WMC

New images are up at WMC. Do we need to crop out the girl or not? D4nnyw14 (talk) 16:44, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

She replied to me too - and wanted to know if we are working together. I'll just not reply lol - did you mention to her that she will be cropped out? I'll put them on the crop list and when they are added to articles, you can link her too them. (She did say she wanted to see where they are going didn't she?)RaintheOne ^BAM 16:51, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Yeah and i think so :S don't think cropping her will be a problem but could be. How long will crop list take?D4nnyw14 (talk) 16:56, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Another thing this is ok despite it being B+W isn't it?D4nnyw14 (talk) 16:57, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Not long, about an hour or two - there seems to be a good editor always on hand there. BTW, the dog in the pond pic is perfect! :)RaintheOne ^BAM 17:13, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Person was really helpful. Changed it wrongly then changed it to the right and said thanks to me for using it :)D4nnyw14 (talk) 17:21, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Oh Danny, you've named the images "with fan" - :p Fan won't be present for much longer. Anyway, they're in the request spot now. Eeeeeek, loving the gallery.RaintheOne ^BAM 18:16, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Oooh thought both images would stay. Have you requested a rename? Or i'll do it. D4nnyw14 (talk) 18:26, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

I requested a rename lolRaintheOne ^BAM 18:30, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll email her after it's all completed. D4nnyw14 (talk) 18:33, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Four of them are now cropped and ready - the name will stay the same apparently lol :)RaintheOne ^BAM 21:35, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

We can request name changes later. I did for Jack cos i named it something really long by accident. Why haven't Karen Hassan and Carley Stenson been done?D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:46, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

It says not to ask for too many at once. So one editor has done some, but left Carley for someone else. Didn't ask for Karen sorry. I might wait a few days and We'll get every image there named correctly, I think there are more with long names. Though if you want to you can request.RaintheOne ^BAM 21:54, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Ok i'll do it tommorow.D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:55, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Woop. It was a shame Ethan and Liberty were behind the bloody fence wasn't it.RaintheOne ^BAM 21:57, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Shame Danny Mac really isn't that important too :p Might have been a Chris Fountain one but am not sure. D4nnyw14 (talk) 14:40, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Dan

I don't know what's gone wonky here, Rain, but I've taken the template off. I've just had the same thing with File:AbraDurant.JPG, which is obviously not orphaned either. The only thing I can think of is maybe it's something to do with the pages moving back and forth, but I don't know why that would throw up false 'orphaned' errors =/. Frickative 10:56, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

How strange is that. When I first clicked my talk page, I went crazy because I thought the same was happening like with Ollie's pic! Then read your message. I just moved all those pages back, didn't even see the point in waiting. :)RaintheOne ^BAM 12:47, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Rae Wilson

Hi. I noticed a few issues in the lead which I applied corrections to. There was also a case of "it's" being used where "its" should have been. Just wanted to bring this to your attention, as you may want to keep an eye out for these things (I notice it's nominated for GA). -- James26 (talk) 05:04, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Thankyou James, I shall make a bigger effort to combat those errors in future. I do often misplace punctuation and make some grammatical errors, probs my worst flaw on here. I manage to notice most these days though.RaintheOne ^BAM 15:01, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Silas

I'm doing Silas's storylines now and what can I say about that thing with Mercedes when he was walking up behind her with the candle stick, he was going to murder/hurt her right?--AcidBrights (talk) 20:20, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

That was so touching, so here's my thanks :)

GSorby – Ping! 16:48, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Mandy

So she has definitely gone? Yahoo! are saying christmas now?D4nnyw14 (talk) 17:15, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Who publishes DS now? And say im adding a source from DS from 2010 who would i put the publisher as? Thanks D4nnyw14 (talk) 15:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Sent you a message at D.S. if you get a chance to reply :) D4nnyw14 (talk) 16:49, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

After i've finished M++T+J do G+C+N need sections? Are they noteworthy enough yet? I think they are?D4nnyw14 (talk) 15:36, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Was wondering should Terry the dog be put into recurring. He has his own cast profile and i'm sure Jaci Stephens commented on him the other day so we could give him a table entry. Speaking of dogs we now have a Hollie-Jay pic (Jk i love Hollie-Jay and Michaela).D4nnyw14 (talk) 20:40, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

That is good news, why does it look different on the upload page though? Like the usual info is not there. As for Terry, non of include pets unless they become notable like Bouncer in Neighbours and Wellard in EE. Dogs like Eccles, Terence and co have profiles sometimes, but just get discarded here. So I wouldn't worry about it.RaintheOne ^BAM 20:57, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Ok info is here weirdly. Should we just merge both files?D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:02, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

You'll need to request someone merge the two and look over it - complicated this one!RaintheOne ^BAM 21:05, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

How and where?D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:39, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Although i don't know if you'll know but i thought i'd ask you first. Do you know why the template thingy you add to a page in the wikiproject comes up as NA-class for redirects (e.g. [4]) but on EE's redirects they are added to the catergory automatically and come up as redirect e.g. ([5]).D4nnyw14 (talk) 18:40, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing D4nnyw14 (talk) 20:15, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Nana Moon GA

I was looking at Nana Moon, could it reach GA, after that extremely 'in depth' review of Rainie, and the pass of Dotty and Yusef, I guess it cold be plausible. I would have to do all the publishing details first- comments? MayhemMario 20:32, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

My Comments? Cool. I think you shouldn't nominate Nana Moon at all - it is a poor article, worse than Manda Best's. I'll give you one thing though, your GA's have been lucky - some of us around here have to jump through several thousand hoops before we have our work promoted to GA.RaintheOne ^BAM 21:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

I was a little surprised at Rainie's review and if I didn't have better things to do, I'd probably take it to WP:GAR. Manda's review was somewhat better, though the reviewer made some incorrect suggestions. This is an expample of a good review - [6]. The reviewer was great and the article totally benefitted from that review. It's probably one of my strongest GAs out there. - JuneGloom Talk 22:55, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

I agree with all your comments, that's why I brought it up. Dotty, yes it is a GA, but it is listed as low, which is correct, but so is Chrissie Watts, which i.m.o has had a lot more work put into it than Dotty's, Rainie's and Yusef's , i think we all need a clear understanding of what level GA's should be listed at. Yes if articles like Dotty are passed, good news for the project.

Another thing, though some may be against it, should we ask for a reassassement of Manda Best, the reveiw was poor, with the reviewer not undertstanding the article at all. Just a few thoughts. I did think that Rainie review could have been better, i was slightly surprised. MayhemMario 15:24, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

I think you have made a mistake in asking for another review.. I've got to be honest Mario, it is a nice effort you put in - but not enough for GA. It is a little thin, hardly any fleshed out development.. Have you built Manda's article to it's full potential? I didn't agree with the quickfail or points made - but that is just because there are some more .. lets say obvious issues. I want you to do better, so in future really work at something. I feel you have a tendancy to nominate everything you expand.RaintheOne ^BAM 16:16, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

I have taken Manda off GA if you havent noticed. :)MayhemMario 21:42, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Sources requested for Anthony Moon

Hello Rain. I see sources are sort of your department! So if you ever get some free time, can you try and find some sources, preferably Reception for Anthony Moon please? If you do, can you post them on the talk page of my draft located here please? Thanks, GSorby – Ping! 22:54, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Seth Costello

Hi rain. i don't see why you undid some of my corrections to the Seth Costello page? On the page, you had, word for word - "He takes a pill and while having sex with the prostitute he begins to think he is having sex with Mercedes and kills her but in reality is he has killed the prostitiute". This is not true, Seth did not kill the prostitute. I fixed it but it got undone. Also, Esther did not kiss Seth. He made a move on her but she pulled back. I also added that Seth invited Ruby as his guest to the wedding - it's information about the character I don't see why it can't be added.

It wasn't my idea to add the Jason and hormones details, someone else did, so I just fixed it up.

Also, I don't understand your "Eastenders may be top dog everywhere else..." comment. I don't even like Eastenders. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DesertHotIceCold (talk • contribs) 22:21, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Edit : Ok thank you :) That's a fair point, but I felt like I needed to change some incorrect information. And thanks, I'll try and stick around! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DesertHotIceCold (talk • contribs) 22:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Brooke English and Myrtle Fargate

Can you work on these articles for me and that pesky IP editor who recently posted in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fictional women of All My Children, volume 2? I just barely know which parts of storyline in each article are important to keep. Also, that IP editor brought up resources. And I do not want to post this in my talk page which is getting a longer and pre-occupied by IP editor. --Gh87 (talk) 11:58, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

I wasn't going to comment to you in this section until you made this bad-faith nomination, which I replied to. But it is not up to Raintheone to save you from embarrassment. The embarrassment is already there, since you nominated these articles for deletion. I'll continue to be that "pesky IP editor" showing others just how wrong you are until you learn. 174.137.184.36 (talk) 14:38, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

I shall look over them. I have never watched this soap opera, but I'll be able rto figure the main thread of story. I shall add sources if I have time.RaintheOne ^BAM 14:54, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Alex Neeson

Alex Neeson was a fictional character on a soap. Soaps have a lot of characters. He was only part of one storyline. He was only on the show for four months in a show that has ran for 50(!) years. Alex as very little significance to Coronation Street. Considering his lack of significance within his TV show, we can easily say that he has absolutely no real-world significance, and therefore does not qualify for a Wikipedia article. The List of past Coronation Street characters page list the character's name, actor, and time on the show, and that's all that should be included about this guest character. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 12:22, 12 October 2011 (UTC)