User talk:Mayur

Hello, Mayur. You have new messages at Virago250's talk page.
Message added 99.54.8.11 (talk) 15:20, 24 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Thanks for your thanks

Thanks for the feedback on one of my pages! :) GayleKaren (talk) 21:10, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You edited here? I might be mistaken - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GayleKaren/WMF_Recruiting_Strategy_Project&diff=461907878&oldid=461295792 GayleKaren (talk) 19:12, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I got it. Thanks for your kind thanks & Smile :)--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 19:15, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DeSean Jackson

Please make sure you're reverting the proper edit and warning the proper editor. This was a reversal of vandalism, which YOU reverted as vandalism. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 06:13, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please Help

Hey Mayur! You were helping me with a Vandal issue and now I have come across something I am not sure how to fix. Can you look up Bradford Stroh's page please? How do I undo an edit like this? Basically the IP address 71.244.30.84 vandalized the page and then Antishill101 re-editted the same information this way I could not hit undo and correct it easily. Is there a way around this? Thanks in advance. Elementrider77 (talk) 04:48, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Elementrider77, You can request for its semi-protection that will reduce effect of sockpupetry from this page.Cheers--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 07:36, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but how do I revert back to an old old version? They updated it several times so I could not simply hit undo and they made a ton of changes. 108.195.185.215 (talk) 19:05, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Its very Simple first of all go to history the page and then click on revision you want to restore then click edit and save.Your desired version will be saved at the end.Cheers--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 19:07, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Edman

I think I may have been fooled on this one but not sure. I traced the originating edit here, and I can't find anything on google to support the drink-driving claim... Timeshift (talk) 07:29, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As per wiki policies you can remove any unsourced and unreferenced content but whenever you are doing this you should have a proper reason for that and just mention it in edit summary.Cheers--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 07:34, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Userpage Shield
		Thank you for reverting the vandalism done on my page by C21ok. Thank you and happy editing! pluma Ø 18:01, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for such nice geetings:-)--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 18:07, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My Warning

Hi, It appears that the warning you issued to me was in error. I was reverting a vandal's change which you picked up. I am assuming you are also using Huggle?? Yossiea ^(talk) 10:18, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it was an error or edit conflict case.It usually happens when two ediotrs are reverting same edit.--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 10:20, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cut it the hell out

Please stop. YOU ARE ABUSING YOUR TOOLS. Removing unnecessary citation tags is not vandalism. You make a lot of edits like this. If I had any idea how to report you I would. Anyone got this on watch who can help me with that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.240.90.180 (talk) 08:26, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You was removing Citation tag without any explaination in edit summary thats why your edits were reverted.Thanks--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 08:29, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am struggling to be polite. You are abusing your tools. I don't NEED to enter a clear edit summary though it is ENCOURAGED. You are supposed to LOOK AT THE EDIT and ONLY REVERT VANDALISM with your tools. If you looked at the edit you would see it was fine or disputable at worst. Revert not vandalism as vandalism is bad. I see you do this often. Please show more caution. I looked for the rules to make sur. You arent allowed to use vandalism tools for anything isnt OBVIOUS VANDALISM. And removing tags IS NOT removing CONTENT. Anyone is allowed to just remove tags if the problem is fixed or dont exist. LOOK IT UP. One more thing. I apologize if I was too rude in my summaries. I will need to work on that. Civility blah blah blah. I know that sounds dismissive but I have nothing good to say about its requirement that I be a bullshitter. Its a rule though. I get that. Wont do it again if I can help it. Oh another though its dumb. How do I sign without tildes? it wont type on my keyboard. Do you know?

Just use --~~~~ at the end of your comment for signing.Cheers--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 08:58, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unconstructive on huggle

How does one flag a revert as "unconstructive"? Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 08:49, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

if any addition to any content is not related to it or random or having no explanation or vandalism you may revert it as unconstructive. This option is available in Huggle.--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 08:56, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What command do I use? Thanks in advance. Jim1138 (talk) 09:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See my Huggle configuration, Make a Similar or different configuration for you User:Jim1138/huggle.css to enable various options.Cheers--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 09:04, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lithium

Sorry about the copyright issue, I'm new to Wikipedia, and I'm not familiar with the "rules" of uploading. You can help with copyright issues, it's in the image description. FYI, the image is a stock photo. Clammybells (talk) 02:22, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]