User talk:Clammybells

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Clammybells! I am AFriedman and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

AFriedman (talk) 23:26, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Given how long you've been around Wikipedia, it's a bit of a surprise that you weren't formally welcomed before...anyways, welcome and good to see you here! If you have any questions, I'd be delighted to answer them! --AFriedman (talk) 23:28, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:34, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Clammybells. You have new messages at Severo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please slow down!

Hi Clammybells - please slow down! You are creating/renaming pages without waiting for discussion to end on them. First, you proposed a new stub type and waited a handful of minutes rather than the several days required for the proposal vetting process, despite notices on the page saying to wait, now you've renamed a stub type that was at SFD two days into its minimum seven-day discussion process, again despite a notice on the page telling you not to (and you did this by creating a brand new page rather than by the correct moving process, too!).

Wikipedia works by a consensus process, not by direct action, especially where templates and categories are concerned (see the note on these page types at WP:BOLD). Jumping the gun and changing or creating things before discussion has a chance to be complete potentially creates a lot more work for everyone concerned. It doesn't hurt to wait a couple of days to see whether anyone has better ideas on how to proceed! Grutness...wha? 00:44, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comet Austin (1989c1)

Please note that correct new-style designation of comet Austin (1989c1) is C/1989 X1. It is long-period comet. --Fjörgynn (talk) 13:42, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You confuse old-style designation with new-style designation. 1989c1 is an old-style des., but 1989 X1 (not 1989 C1!) is a new-style one. --Fjörgynn (talk) 05:36, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cyberpower

Don't waste my time with your posts on my page.—cyberpower (Talk to Me) 15:28, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Lithium Spectrum.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Lithium Spectrum.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 04:47, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gliese 745 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 745 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 745 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 03:01, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]