Jump to content

User talk:89.148.27.194

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 89.148.27.194 (talk) at 05:05, 13 December 2011. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


December 1980

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Qizilbash, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Qizilbash was changed by 89.148.27.194 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861269 on 2011-12-10T07:48:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:48, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Qizilbash. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 07:54, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Abdullah ibn Saba', you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Abdullah ibn Saba' was changed by 89.148.27.194 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897944 on 2011-12-10T09:17:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:17, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:05, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Al-Nawbakhty, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Al-Nawbakhty was changed by 89.148.27.194 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855881 on 2011-12-12T04:46:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:47, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing, including edit warring, attempting to promote a point of view, racist edit summaries, and other unconstructive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:52, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]