Jump to content

User talk:Sjb72

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Paulmcanders (talk | contribs) at 18:28, 27 January 2012 (→‎Ilovethebeach.com). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Not to be confused with User:Stephen.

Here because I deleted your article? Read through this first to find out why.

If you do leave me a message I will generally respond here, unless you want me to reply elsewhere.

The Signpost: 09 January 2012

thanks for your help

with the citations - very useful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nla25 (talk • contribs) 23:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's quite alright - always pleased to help. Also, credit should go to User:Delusion23 as he did most of them! Stephen! Coming... 23:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your help (again)

with the hyperlinks - will do ---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nla25 (talk • contribs) 20:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries Stephen! Coming... 10:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Come on dude

Do you delete everything you read?

I see how you delete everybody's articles. Get a life. We have ours, and try to publish them; you just delete us.

Idiot.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davegunn99 (talk • contribs) 03:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article was deleted because there was no notability shown. If you can show notability, then let me know and I will restore it for you. Alternatively, make your case at Deletion Review.
Please also be aware that making personal attacks is not permitted and may result in your account being blocked. Stephen! Coming... 10:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like fun to me! Lets do that, Lets do exactly that!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davegunn99 (talk • contribs) 06:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 January 2012

Where is my article?

I spent hours writing it and you deleted it! Do you not respect or recognize professional gold prospectors?? How is a self made millionare suppose to publish himself on wiki? You deleted my article, and I WANT IT BACK!!! Just because I dont have bunch of links and notables in my article you ASSUME im not real? What an Insult... I give you the chance to reconsider your actions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davegunn99 (talk • contribs) 06:59, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I refer you to the answer I gave you earlier, which not only explains why it was deleted, but explains how you can get it back. This is nothing to do with whether or not I believe what you have written. Follow the instructions I gave you, and the article might be restored.
Two more things. First of all, it is not recommended to write articles about yourself. It isn't forbidden, but it can cause issues. Have a read of the conflict of interest policy for more details. Wikipedia is not a business directory; www.linkedin.com will be more use to you.
Secondly, and more importantly: Your last sentence I give you the chance to reconsider your actions is coming very close to making threats. Threats, be it legal or other, will result in you being blocked. I am prepared at this point to believe you are just using words in the heat of the moment without meaning them, so I will not be taking any action. However, if you continue in this manner, I am required to report your actions to the Wikimedia Foundation. Stephen! Coming... 11:41, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint and Suggestion

Give me a break man, I just deleted the lyric and replaced them with the URL linking to YouTube. Your system, your guy, whatever you're ,you just made me nerves. If this continue I might force to leave the site myself. Real nice chatting with you, later... O-o' Thaweerat 15:46, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Ok!, That does it, I'm out of the bloody place. I'm forced to contribute the song else where. Thaweerat 15:46, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

That is entirely up to you.  You should be aware that the reason it was deleted was because there was nothing in the article to indicate that it was notable. If you can demonstrate that it meets the general notability guidelines I will happily restore it. An article consisting of a link to a you tube page is not notable. Stephen! Coming... 11:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Acknowledge, I'll study our guidelines before contributing some more. What I'd say is; our Wiki could do better. Despite that you're working so hard, you could have go easy on novices like us. I don't mind your deletion now. On others hand, can your system do disable the unqualified articles and rollback them to an private user page whose just contributed them. Consider it, this way we novices feel ease of usability-we'll consider wether to improve or delete the articles ourselves-, data transfers between wiki severs could be reduced, and you don't have to work so hard. It's win & win improvement, what is your thought? Thaweerat 15:46, 21 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garlenife (talk • contribs)

What you are referring to is userfying an article. I don't do it for every article I delete, but I do if someone requests the article be restored as they have more material to add. This is to give them time to work on the article without it being deleted. The reason I don't do it with every article is because I don't delete the articles that show the slightest credible assertion of notability. Yes, they can still be deleted, but the deletion process for WP:PROD and WP:AFD lasts several days and gives plenty of opportunity for additional work.
A template that might be of interest to you is {{Template:New page}}. If you are fully aware of the notability guidelines, placing this at the top of a new article should give you some time. However, articles that break WP:BLP or WP:copyvio rules will be deleted straight away.
Hope this helps. Stephen! Coming... 20:30, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
One final thing - you don't need to cut and paste the old thread from the middle of the talk page to the bottom. I monitor all activity on this talk page, and I know immediately exactly what edits have been done. Cutting and pasting threads could cause problems if not done properly; much safer to add your comments to your thread as you originally did and leave it in place. If you're worried about it being archived prematurely, don't be; threads that have not been touched for a set period of time are archived - by adding to the thread, the timer resets Stephen! Coming... 20:39, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ilovethebeach.com

Dear StephenBuxton

I would like to thank you for supporting a page I made called ilovethebeach.com I was wondering if you may please help me get it installed again?

Paulmcanders (talk) 03:33, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What you need to do is show notabilty, address the concerns that were raised at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilovethebeach.com, and show that it meets the requirements of WP:WEB. If you can do that, then the article is likely to survive.
I'll see about restoring and moving the article to a user area a bit later today, so you can work on building the article up without fear of deletion (although it could be deleted immediately if it breaks the rules on WP:BLP, WP:SPAM and WP:COPYVIO). When it is ready, we can see about moving it to main space. Stephen! Coming... 08:01, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've had a look at the deleted article, there are quite a few versions. If I am to restore a version, do you have any preference to which one? Also, one of the reasons that the article was deleted (following the AFD) was it was considered spam. I can see why that was the case, as it isn't easy to write an article about a product (be it a website, goods, company, etc) without it sounding like an advert. You might also want to have a read of WP:PROMO and WP:Puffery. Stephen! Coming... 12:57, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Dear StephenBuxton

I am willing to exept any and all help that you are willing to provide so please feel free to ask for any help that you may need.

Paulmcanders (talk) 19:39, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear StephenBuxton

Thanks for the help so far. I am having trouble with some of the pictures I uploaded may you please teach me how I my be able to upload pictures and not have them deledted for copyright? Also please restore the latest version of my page ilovethebeach.com it was the best I was able to write and I would like to start from there.

Paulmcanders (talk) 22:00, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look at restoring the page at some point tomorrow - my bed is calling to me! I'm afraid the one thing I am unable to help with is images - copyright law is a minefield, and my understanding of how it relates to images is extremely shakey. Your best bet would be to ask at the help desk. Stephen! Coming...
I see that you restored the article. I was in the middle of asking TParis and RHaworth for their consent to do that. But now, I don't need to follow-up on that. =) Thanks. I'm not sure if you read the entirety of Paulmcanders's talk page, but I've been answering his questions about the article for awhile now. Having another voice would be handy. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:20, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I hadn't, but I have now. Sure, I'll help lend a voice of guidance. Stephen! Coming... 10:23, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks a lot man you are the best!!! To answer your question I am not afiliated with site. I am just looking to spread a neutral stance on this subject. Now in my progress i have found this link : http://www.ilovethebeach.com/reviews.htm

As you can see it has very high ratings which proves it is 1# in it's field. We can find a lot of notability here.

Another thing I was talking to godo about was the fact the the site made a video with Victoria Beckham topless. Here is the news article :

http://exclusivo.terra.com.br/interna/0,,OI1312608-EI1118,00.html

It is in portuguese so you will have to translate it.

The orginal video was created by Ilovethebeach.com which are here:

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/321140/caught_on_the_topless_beach_victoria_beckham/

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x28a1q_caught-beach-victoria-beckham_sport

http://xxxbunker.com/victoria_beckham_topless

Please come back to me on your ideias also will Godo get this?

Paulmcanders (talk) 21:34, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]



I also found this if it may help.It is in French :

http://sexo.paperblog.fr/872773/victoria-beckham-seins-nus/

Paulmcanders (talk) 18:10, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Take a look at this video it example so of the privacy laws I was talking about.

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xnsed9_hdsb08055-360_sexy#rel-page-13

Paulmcanders (talk) 18:28, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your consulting.

Your guy are patience, I should take my time on learning our wiki society. Even though I find some policies have complicated, I'll learn them. And should you have any more advice, we'll talk more here. Thanks again. Thaweerat 08:25, 25 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garlenife (talk • contribs)

No worries; I'm here to help. If in doubt, be bold and edit, and make a note on the talk page explaining why you did that. Any questions? Ask me, or (for a more rapid response) the Help Desk is a useful resource. Stephen! Coming... 12:50, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 January 2012

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sjb72&oldid=473553517"