Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabbath Rest Advent Church

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication it meets the requirements of WP:ORG. All sources appear to be self-published. Jayjg ^(talk) 21:13, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zad68 (talk • contribs) 02:49, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: the main website is German, and the German name is "Sabbatruhe-Advent-Gemeinschaft." It has a paragraph in Die Kirchen, Sondergruppen und religiösen Vereinigungen: ein Handbuch, but I don't know what it says. St Anselm (talk) 05:32, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL.

Keep -- Though this is a badly written article, probably with POV issues, it is an article about a denomination, not merely one about a single congregation church. It is probably a splinter of the Seventh Day Adventists. I do not know how significant, but certainly NOT NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:27, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- If you don't know how significant it is, and there aren't any sources, then how do you know it's "certainly NOT NN"? Jayjg ^(talk) 15:49, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 14:34, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I could find no significant coverage outside of books published by the church itself, required by notability guideline WP:ORG. The history of the denomination cited in the article says (p 14) that they have only 2000 members worldwide. Edison (talk) 23:34, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because authors/editors are working on it (3rd party sources, neutrality, etc).Rmorstadt (talk) 12:26, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- They may be working on it, but they still haven't found any sources yet that actually discuss the church and comply with WP:RS. Jayjg ^(talk) 21:56, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Third party sources added (see references 2, 3, 6-9). PTtrans (talk) 16:00, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Reference 2 is from a Wikipedia mirror. A quick check of the other sources in the article indicate many are not about this specific church, or fail WP:RS. Jayjg ^(talk) 21:56, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Not quite sure what you mean Jayjg, every third party reference given (2, 3, 6-9) specifically mentions the Sabbath Rest Advent Church. Nor are any of these sources self-published or questionable. Do you have a conflict of interest or was your "quick check" too quick? PTtrans (talk) 17:17, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]