Talk:Tyrannosaurus
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tyrannosaurus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Tyrannosaurus is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 12, 2006. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.Dinosaurs FA‑class | ||||||||||
|
To-do list for Tyrannosaurus: Please be bold in editing the article and in editing/adding/striking out items from this list.
The part about speed needs to be fixed. In order for a Tyrannosaurus to run at 45mph it would need massive legs muscles. The size of the muscles it needed for that kind of speed would be too heavy for it to lift. In comparison, the leg muscles it did have were already heavy enough, so that the combined wieght of the leg muscles and the body forced it to walk straight legged, like an elephant. So much leg muscle would also mean that some muscle would have to actually be taken away from the jaws to add to that(A creature can only have so much muscle in it before it becomes to heavy to move itself). Also that type of speed would be dangerous for a Tyrannosaurus. The skull of T-rex was extremely heavy, and those arms could not support its weight at all, so one fall could be fatal for it. Therefor the Tyrannosaurus could only run at about 15-20 mph. Sorry, I just had to get that out.:) Watch out for the Discovery ChannelMs. dino fanatic (talk) 02:02, 2 March 2008 (UTC) show "Tyrannosaurus- New Science: New Beast". That's where I get all of this from.
missile |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 12, 2004 and August 12, 2007. |
Archives |
---|
Tyrannosaur Paleobiology: New Research on Ancient Exemplar Organisms
Brusatte et al. (2010) Tyrannosaur Paleobiology: New Research on Ancient Exemplar Organisms. Science Vol. 329. no. 5998, pp. 1481 - 1485.doi:10.1126/science.1193304
Tyrannosaurs, the group of dinosaurian carnivores that includes Tyrannosaurus rex and its closest relatives, are icons of prehistory. They are also the most intensively studied extinct dinosaurs, and thanks to large sample sizes and an influx of new discoveries, have become ancient exemplar organisms used to study many themes in vertebrate paleontology. A phylogeny that includes recently described species shows that tyrannosaurs originated by the Middle Jurassic but remained mostly small and ecologically marginal until the very end of the Cretaceous. Anatomical, biomechanical, and histological studies of T. rex and other derived tyrannosaurs show that large tyrannosaurs could not run rapidly, were capable of crushing bite forces, had accelerated growth rates and keen senses, and underwent pronounced changes during ontogeny. The biology and evolutionary history of tyrannosaurs provide a foundation for comparison with other dinosaurs and living organisms.
Arms
Would T-rex's arms have been visible when it was alive. You can see vestigial limbs on the skeletons of some snakes, but they are not visible on a living animal. Perhaps this was the case with tyrannosaurs too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.36.148.242 (talk) 06:59, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- Yes they would have. The presence of tendon avulsions demonstrate they were likely used while subduing prey. Abyssal (talk) 19:37, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- Tyrannosaurus' arms were not vestigial in any sort of way. So yes, they would have been visible.--137.146.143.192 (talk) 19:49, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Largest tyrannosaur
The article states that Tyrannosaurus was the largest known tyrannosaur, but doesn't its record for being large get more generic than that. If I am not mistaken, it is also the largest coelurosaur, is it not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.36.148.242 (talk) 21:40, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- Well, Senter & Robins in 2010 gave a range of extrapolated possible hip heights for Deinocheirus, the upper end of which range surpassed the known hip height of Sue.--MWAK (talk) 17:41, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Height at hips
In the 2nd paragrpaph it says "up to 4 metres (13 ft) tall at the hips" but on other websites i'm sure it said something like five to six metres tall, what's going on?! B903hd11 — Preceding unsigned comment added by B903hd11 (talk • contribs) 12:48, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Which other sites are you talking about? did they say 5-6m tall at the hips or just in general (which could mean standing in a Godzilla pose)? MMartyniuk (talk) 13:08, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Popularity
What exactly is it that the public loves about Tyrannosaurus? I'm not judging them, T.rex happens to be one of my favourite theropods as well, but I can't help but wonder what they see in it that they don't see in other similarly sized theropods such as Saurophaganax, Acrocanthosaurus, and Mapusaurus among others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinolover45 (talk • contribs) 16:00, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- FA-Class dinosaurs articles
- Unknown-importance dinosaurs articles
- WikiProject Dinosaurs articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists
- Selected anniversaries (August 2004)
- Selected anniversaries (August 2007)