Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Vanished user 352535 (talk | contribs) at 02:30, 19 February 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rollback

(add requestview requests)


getting involved more in Wikipedia besides editing and creating articles. thanks for your time Jobberone (talk) 12:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment)You started fighting vandalism just today. It seems you got the grasp of what vandalism is and when to revert but I think administrators would want to see a little more out of you. Keep up the good work though.—cyberpower (Chat)(WP Edits: 516,973,998) 23:29, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Thanks.Jobberone (talk) 09:46, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not much of an editor here in en:WP but I do stalk a number of equine articles (that often face revertible page action) and am admin at fi:WP so I'm familiar with rollback standards. Pitke (talk) 10:32, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment)Confirmed per [1]. User is also a member of ArbCom. You may find this link helpful.—cyberpower (Chat)(WP Edits: 517,266,794) 12:31, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:57, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have been around for near on six months now. I mostly do gnomish work (cleaning up, wikifying), but also reverting vandalism (mainly using scripts; see here), and a bit of NPP. I have read WP:RBK, and figured it'd help make fighting vandalism easier (and more efficient). I'm pretty sure that i have a fair share of common sense (in there, somewhere :) ; and i feel i can put it (the rollback this time) to good and proper use (of course, if i didn't i wouldn't even be bothering to file this request). Cheers, benzband (talk) 15:43, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done --slakrtalk / 22:31, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of the BLPs on my watchlist continue to have the same vandalism and problems, for a lot of them it seems to be only me that spots it so I think this would be very useful for keeping on top of the problems RafikiSykes (talk) 16:28, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done --slakrtalk / 22:37, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Even though I retired and withdrew my rollback rights because I was angry at that time, I have decided that I want my rollback rights back. Abhijay (☎ Talk) (✐ Deeds) 17:12, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Cheers. Salvio Let's talk about it! 23:06, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am doing fine without it, but as I watchlist several hundred mountain related articles, lately it seems I have been spending more time reverting and less of my free time adding content and editing infoboxes (infobox updates and fixes I consider my primary mission). Rollback may be helpful in reducing time spent reverting or at least a step in the right dirction for me. Thank you. Racerx11 (talk) 12:29, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Please, remember that rollback is only meant for clear-cut cases of vandalism. Cheers. Salvio Let's talk about it! 22:30, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've been on Wikipedia since March 2008. I'm currently active in dispute resolution and when I have some time I patrol the recent changes for vandalism and major reversions issuing necessary warnings to the user(s) when necessary using Twinkle. Whenaxis talk · contribs 02:30, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]