User talk:20thtryer

Hello, 20thtryer, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 12:59, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

This help request has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please replace the code {{Help me-helped}} on this page with {{Help me}}, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Help me

What is this? What do I do here?--20thtryer (talk) 12:43, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It all depends—what do you want to do here? (Or in other words, are you talking about this talk page in particular, or Wikipedia in general)? Either way, some of the links I added above may help, and again, welcome! Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 12:59, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I am interested in chapter 7, reverting vandalism. But when is the huge article I go "what is this!!?". Can you please explain what it all means (but in way that is a bit less... complicated?--20thtryer (talk) 13:07, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure what you mean when you say "I am interested in chapter 7, reverting vandalism" but here is a link that explains reverting vandalism for beginners: Reverting vandalism for beginners.

Also, I would suggest you go through the Wikipedia Video Tutorial: CLICK HERE. Many of your questions will probably be answered by going through the entire Tutorial. Shearonink (talk) 18:54, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think I will use twinkle, any ideas about its function (I have already started using it, since I have put the "talkback" note n your talk page).--20^thtryer talk 15:50, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Twinkle is a tool that needs to be used with care, don't let the tool itself be a substitute for using your own common sense. Make sure you understand Twinkle helps. There are a couple of issues I see in your edits:

I think you need to go through the Wikipedia Tutorial CLICK HERE to learn some of the ins and outs of being a Wikipedia editor. I see that you posted a question that had nothing to do with improving the associated article at Talk:Posttraumatic stress disorder.
I just now figured out that something is wrong with your signature, you are signing your talk page posts with an unrelated link: [[User:UserBob|20thtryer]] [[User talk:UserBob|talk]].
1. You should be signing with four tildes ~~~~.
2. Go to LIVE HELP before you do any more edits. Shearonink (talk) 16:25, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Signature, fixed. As for PTSD, my mistake. --20^thtryer talk 16:28, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with my signature--20^thtryer talk 16:31, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Now fixed. Small bug.--20^thtryer talk 16:32, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem, I just didn't want people to be trying to contact you and instead end up at User:Bob instead. Shearonink (talk) 16:33, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This place is GLITCHED!!!!.--20^thtryer talk 16:34, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Giving up. Reverted to my original signature. By the way, try not to use the stop hand as it looks like a final warning.--20thtryer (talk) 16:37, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, 20thtryer, what was wrong with your signature above? It looks fine to me...what were you trying to get it to look like? Maybe I can help. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:02, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! 20thtryer, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! NtheP (talk) 16:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, 20thtryer. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Talkback

Hello, 20thtryer. You have new messages at Writ Keeper's talk page.
Message added 17:47, 29 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:47, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, 20thtryer. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 21:58, 29 March 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Re: Copyright

Hello, 20thtryer. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nathan2055 ^talk 16:13, 30 March 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, 20thtryer. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 16:27, 30 March 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, 20thtryer. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Charles (talk) 17:32, 30 March 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hello, 20thtryer. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by McDoob AU 93 18:22, 30 March 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Okay, I'm going to be completely honest here.

Hey, 20th. I'm going to be honest with you, here, so forgive me if this seems harsh, but it needs to be said. You're taking a very emotional, impassioned stance for someone who has never been the subject of administrative actions. The problem is that the types of questions you're asking, when they come from someone who as far as I can tell has no edits to articles themselves and no formal warnings or blocks, are typical of a user who has been blocked on another account and made a new one to vent. In other words, you've raised the suspicion in several of our hosts' minds (mine included) that this account is a sockpuppet. Among other things, our policy on multiple accounts says that users who are blocked are not allowed to make a new account to continue editing. Creating things like a meta-essay expounding on the admins who are bullies is not going to help allay these suspicions; quite the opposite, in fact. This is why we're advising you to not go through with it.

I'm trying to give you some advice here; this is not in any way a formal warning (if nothing else, I'm not an administrator myself, so I can't directly take action regardless of what happens). If you are a sockpuppet of a blocked editor, please please please stop using this account and request an unblock on your original account. If you are not a sockpuppet, you should drop this crusade against the admins right away and try to do something else on Wikipedia. There are a lot of articles that could use your passion! Try to funnel it into something creative, by improving articles, rather than something (self-)destructive, like raging about admins. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:39, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay 20th. I don't think this is bad. I think Writ Keeper just warned you that you stop boasting about admins and try to improve wikipedia. Admins can do anything,you know. But never an admin has thrested me. This thing feels like you are the opposition leader of the opposition against the admins. I will make a real form of what he said : He warned you that if you shout about admins again you will be blocked(or anything worse).

Resolve your problem through peace. Try to say good about admins and everything else in Wikipedia. Join some Wikiprojects whose works you know and improve and create articles.

                                            Always Remember
                  Help to build a better future for Wikipedia so it will be always better tommorow.

But, see. Even though I am a peacekeeper at Wikipedia,I am always prepared to defend my self. So if you think of something to boast about me, Beware!The admins will haunt you in your dreams! Take this slogan to the highest:Knowledge should be hailed!For it should reach the farthest aleins--Monareal (talk) 14:33, 31 March 2012 (UTC) I don't understand. What exactly are you trying to say.--20th Tryer ⚡✀ 14:48, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]