Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
Autopatrolled
- Status · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · identified · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions)
- With over 25k edits and 51 article creations, I believe that I am active enough to have the autopatrolled rights. — Statυs (talk) 23:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- I have found at least 3 of your creations are redirects so you should do a recount of articles excluding those that started as redirects. Once the number of article creations that are actually not redirects is over 50 then qualification takes place. It does not matter what they are like now, only how they are created as that is what the autopatrolled applies to. But I am happy to note that Status is not creating articles that get deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:24, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- I don't quite understand what you mean. I got the number from this tool, which now says 52. — Statυs (talk) 04:50, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Maybe Graeme Bartlett means, that 3 of these were created by you as a redirect and than latter expanded by some to an article. I have such articles on my list too. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 13:08, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Jetstreamer · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · identified · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions)
- With almost 11000 edits to date, I have created 76 articles –some of them DYKs– and I don't think the articles I start need patrolling. I consider myself an editor that understands the importance of citing sources, and not only for new articles. Thanks in advance for considering this request. Jetstreamer Talk 11:14, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Done ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 19:59, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks ItsZippy. Regards.--Jetstreamer Talk 22:26, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
- Coal town guy · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · identified · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions)
- According to this this user has created 164 mainly stub-quality articles on real unincorporated towns in West Virginia, which are generally accepted to be notable. I have seen no indication that any article this user has created or intends to create are inappropriate. The only thing this user has working against him is that his account has only been registered for 3 weeks. I realize I probably didn't need the user's permission to nominate him here, but I obtained it anyways for the sake of politeness. —KuyaBriBriTalk 17:45, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Already done confirmed by KingpinBot (talk · contribs) (this user currently has the autoreviewer right. Admins: remember to use a {{done}} template or alternative so the bot knows what the intended result is) - KingpinBot (talk) 10:15, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
- Done Although I'm not a admin; let me do this for the sake of the bot. Dipankan (Have a chat?) 09:29, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- Dssis1 · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · identified · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions)
I would like to have this right to enable me to automatically patrol pages that I create. I create around 4 pages per week depending on how busy I am. I don't think that I need another editor patrolling a page that I created.