User talk:Strike Eagle
![]() | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/07/Little_red_wikipedia_book.jpg)
![]() Archives (Index) |
I can handle this all myself but I m getting pretty less time for wiki (actually my addiction is causing me a headache if I do too much of wiki). So in free time can you please have a look at it and try to address minor concerns if possible. Thanks :) →TSU tp* 07:49, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar
Thank you. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 04:33, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 June 2012
- News and notes: Foundation finance reformers wrestle with CoI
- WikiProject report: Counter-Vandalism Unit
- Featured content: The cake is a pi
- Arbitration report: Procedural reform enacted, Rich Farmbrough blocked, three open cases
You deserve this
An ICBM for you!
![]() |
The Intercontinental Barnstar |
For participating in the discussion about Agni-V and VI range projection image...:) Anir1uph (talk) 16:38, 13 June 2012 (UTC) |
- wow and thanks a lot!..
.....btw....did you and mrt reach any consensus about Agni-Range projection image..I mean any new image proposals..etc.....if no then, we may proceed for the second stage-SVG conversion.What say? ϮheჂtriԞeΣagle Sorties 14:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Yes, consensus was reached, and the new image is on use on many pages. Tho i do feel that the font used on the image should be more professional, and not a sans font :P (i havnt told anyone about this, just my own opinion). Yes we should proceed with it. Anir1uph (talk) 15:33, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Can you give me the link to the new image? ϮheჂtriԞeΣagle Sorties 15:41, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- so..its the same we discussed...good..
ϮheჂtriԞeΣagle Sorties 15:56, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- so..its the same we discussed...good..
June 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:JCAla. Please comment on the content and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Mar4d (talk) 04:18, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hi SE! Hope that you take out some time and do wiki from your busy life lately! I saw your barnstar in which few editors were accused of pushing POV by you. Well SE, that wasn't the right thing. It only adds petrol in the flame. On one hand while I discourage Mar4d for templating you, I'd also like to advise you to avoid typing names of specific editors. "Comment on contributions not on the editor". Your busy life can lay influence on editing on wiki in the start as it gets too much mixed up so take care while editing. I know that you'll find a way and please don't repeat typing names in a negative way. Thanks buddy! →TSU tp* 07:02, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Just a note, SE. It is ok to completely blank others' comments from your talk page but you should not amend or refactor them. See WP:TPO for further reference on editing comments on talkpages. Also, it is completely normal to cite wikipolicies to other editors. That is not preaching as you call it. Well there's a template for what I just wrote and there's equal support for templating the regulars but writing it out to you for the good faith. --lTopGunl (talk) 13:47, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Amend and refactor?..I didn't amend anything by Mar4d.I just striked it off as I felt it was not necessary.Mentioning names somewhere else...I couldn't realize it was attacking other users(not the talk page one)......anyway....TSU removed the names from both JCAla's talk and Mar4d's talk.Maybe it's normal to cite wikipolices to relatively new users...however..I know the policy...he should have removed the names himself from both the barnstars and left a note(not template) in my talk.That would have been better...rather than using TW to Templar my page. ϮheჂtriԞeΣagle Sorties 14:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- TSU being uninvolved did a good faith act, if Mar4d removed it, I'm not sure things would have gone the same way... it would have been incited more. For policies, I disagree... when I cite policies, the purpose is to back up my argument, not to preach - though it is right that even relatively old users often might not be aware of all the policies (and they are not required to be). TW is just easy and quick and says what's just needed to be conveyed, though it is better leaving just a message when things could get flamed up - templating should also be taken in equal good faith. And about the strike, that counts in refactoring in my opinion... striking means he has redacted the comment.. I don't see that he did. Just trying to cool things down here. Thanks for the {{tb}}.. you're not on my watchlist. --lTopGunl (talk) 14:52, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yes....he should have removed it...and then should have messaged(not templar) me.That would have been completely different.You may cite policies for backing up your argument but you must also remember that the other user might already be aware of those and might tackle them.yes..I striked the comment as I felt it was not worth templating me.And about the tb thing...yes..I know that.. ;) ϮheჂtriԞeΣagle Sorties 15:00, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- TSU being uninvolved did a good faith act, if Mar4d removed it, I'm not sure things would have gone the same way... it would have been incited more. For policies, I disagree... when I cite policies, the purpose is to back up my argument, not to preach - though it is right that even relatively old users often might not be aware of all the policies (and they are not required to be). TW is just easy and quick and says what's just needed to be conveyed, though it is better leaving just a message when things could get flamed up - templating should also be taken in equal good faith. And about the strike, that counts in refactoring in my opinion... striking means he has redacted the comment.. I don't see that he did. Just trying to cool things down here. Thanks for the {{tb}}.. you're not on my watchlist. --lTopGunl (talk) 14:52, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Amend and refactor?..I didn't amend anything by Mar4d.I just striked it off as I felt it was not necessary.Mentioning names somewhere else...I couldn't realize it was attacking other users(not the talk page one)......anyway....TSU removed the names from both JCAla's talk and Mar4d's talk.Maybe it's normal to cite wikipolices to relatively new users...however..I know the policy...he should have removed the names himself from both the barnstars and left a note(not template) in my talk.That would have been better...rather than using TW to Templar my page. ϮheჂtriԞeΣagle Sorties 14:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Congratulations, from STiki !
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
|
![]() |
Congratulations, Strike Eagle! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and DBigXray 16:29, 15 June 2012 (UTC) |
- thanks a lot.......
ϮheჂtriԞeΣagle Sorties 14:56, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
Since last few days, your work in anti-vandal area is remarkable! I m impressed a lot. Thanks for that and I hope that you continue this. You deserve this... →TSU tp* 16:29, 16 June 2012 (UTC) |
- Thanks a lot TSU..that was quite cheerful to do more.
ϮheჂtriԞeΣagle Sorties 16:41, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Your WP:RS/N question has been rejected as too vague. Please supply the following:
- Citations of specific sources, at the article level
- Per source, supply the Encyclopaedia article that it is intended to be used in, and the specific claims that it will be used to support.
Thank you, Fifelfoo (talk) 07:54, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
And who are you to dictate terms on Pakistani article? are you an admin to revert edits? no. Nevertheless, I do agree consesus should be reached but do NOT revert my edits. Pk-user (talk) 14:32, 17 June 2012 (UTC)