Talk:Kingdom Hearts III

Video games C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

David Pierce (CEO) (3 participants)
Build order (2 participants)
8 Ball Pool (5 participants)
Star Wars: The Old Republic: Fatal Alliance (4 participants)
Utopia bootdisk (1 participant)
Wii Freeloader (0 participants)
Glitching (video games) (5 participants)
Covet Fashion (5 participants; relisted)
Vector TDx (2 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Existence

Umm, should this page even exist? I mean, there's nothing on it but rumours and speculation, which, as far back as I can remember, were not allowed on Wikipedia, unless the rules were changed suddenly. It even starts with unknown claims (like the platform and release date). I think this should just be redirected to Kingdom Hearts. I'm putting up a vote, and I'm against this page. 79.153.144.186 (talk) 09:57, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it is never made, it is still notable, because it has received significant coverage in third party reliable sources. Plus, there is more then just "rumors and speculation". The whole first paragraph of the history section is official statements. Then there is a whole paragraph on reaction of the making of this game. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 14:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Um, even though it has reliable sources, there's not enough material to deem it a separate article yet. These tidbits can be added to the main series page for Kingdom Hearts and even a sequel section for the Kingdom Hearts II article. This article should not exist yet. ♫ Douglasr007 (talk) 03:53, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not much smaller than Chrono Break, a certified good article. It cannot even reasonably be argued that it does not fulfill the notability criteria - it has several references asserting not only its existence, but its sheer popularity as well. Considering the upcoming release of a video game that is directly linked to this game, news will obviously be on its way. But again, all of this is irrelevant due to the fact that size is not an aspect of determining notability. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 05:05, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As much as I play Kingdom Hearts, no official announcement has bee made only mentions in interviews, so this page shouldn't even excistRxlthunder (talk) 14:04, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Things don't even have to exist to have articles. As long as there is coverage, it's fine. Its like those movies that get announced, and then fail in production, and are made again like 5 years later. An article with the history of what happened is useful to readers. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 14:09, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this page should be removed! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.184.50.157 (talk) 01:36, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why? - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 04:46, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's the apocalypse. Even anons know that Wikipedia isn't a WP:CRYSTALBALL! :) Axem Titanium (talk) 05:27, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CRYSTAL says that "Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation." This is verified speculation. Plus, two whole other thirds of the article that have nothing to do with speculation. History and Reaction. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 13:33, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's not going to be released for a long while, and this isn't a site of speculation! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.184.50.157 (talk) 23:29, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't you actually the user putting speculation in the article?Tintor2 (talk) 23:32, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't speculation, it's bound to happen, as Disney Owns Power Rangers rights! and if so, Marvel would be a speculation too! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.184.50.157 (talk) 02:00, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speculation is educated guesses. So yes, what you are doing is speculation. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 10:18, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, If so, then so are you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.232.88 (talk) 21:51, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How? At no point have I personally speculated on Kingdom Hearts III in the article. Being a reliable source, sites such as IGN can have their speculation used. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 22:02, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You say that Marvel Characters might appear, and that the world will end in 2012, That is Definatelly Speculation! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.232.88 (talk) 02:15, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are strangely misreading everything we are saying. We never said that Marvel characters might appear. A reliable source commenting on the subject said it. Just because we write what they speculate does not make it our speculation. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 02:18, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well they are speculation, and wikipedia does not put in Speculation! Unless it allows all of Them to be in IT! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.232.88 (talk) 05:21, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it does. I do not see why it is this hard for you to understand that speculation from reliable sources is allowed while speculation from Wikipedia users is not. The reason speculation from users is not allowed is because if one user can speculate on content, all users can. The reason why speculation from reliable sources is used is because the people speculating are an expert in the field that they are speculating on. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 05:29, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's Not a speculation just from users, it's from many people, even people on youtube say It! And Power Rangers, just like Marvel is Disney so it's bound to happen! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.232.88 (talk) 02:04, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding this content. It is wrong, and unsourced. It is speculation by random people. This is not allowed. Everything in Wikipedia articles should be able to be sourced to a reliable source. Original research is not allowed. If we included every silly thing everybody says, this article would be 5 miles long. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 02:11, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Any "general person" is not a reliable source. There is no attribution to their comments, and no way to say that this speculation is based on anything, whereas speculation from IGN can be attributed to reliable people who are experts in their field. The point is that if it's not coming from a reliable source, it's not to be included. We do not allow just "any" speculation. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 02:15, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is not wrong, and it will happen, I know it!! Fine, i'll find a source and show you! Really! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.232.88 (talk) 03:00, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Power Rangers is owned by Saban Brands, not Disney. Disney sold it back to Saban last year. Now please stop adding Power Rangers to Disney articles. [1] 124.171.206.147 (talk) 23:27, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, But Disney will buy it, and everything back! Really! They told me in C2E2, And Power Rangers does belong there, In Disney articles and everything! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.232.88 (talk) 08:21, 1 May 2011 (UTC) Really! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.232.88 (talk) 08:26, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, like your "imaginary friend at Disney" is a reliable source for things. Until you can find a proper source saying otherwise, things here stays as is. Any attempts to say otherwise without a reliable source will be considered trolling and/or vandalism. Sb617 (Talk) 08:43, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's Not Imaginary! They did talk to me at The Convention! But If you want a source, then fine i'll find one! And Kingdom Hearts isn't coming out for a long time just to let you know! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.232.88 (talk) 08:55, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This page should be removed because its very existence is going to lead people to believe that such a project exists. A proper article title would be, "Speculation on Continuation of the Kingdom Hearts Franchise", or melded into a larger article titled, "Unconfirmed SquareEnix Games". I don't think either of those two articles should exist either, but they would be a lot more factual than listing the existence of something that the company in question declines to comment on.HotLimit1 (talk) 17:09, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A third Kingdom Hearts is in the lineup. It just isn't confirmed to be being developed yet. We aren't lieing. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 22:56, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Who knows? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.232.88 (talk) 04:00, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

it's more than likely to be made since dream drop distance is being created and thats why they are not in the procces and are probably keep hush hush over time.i have witnessed it in many cases of movies and video games.trust me--Pokemon30 (talk) 00:36, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. http://uk.games.ign.com/articles/118/1181920p1.html practically confirms that the game will be made, by revealing that it will be the last game Xehanort is in. Ajkseqawhj (talk) 22:25, 20 September 2011 (UTC) Dream drop distance is coming so is kingdom hearts III we just don't know when. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.49.170.38 (talk) 21:50, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This page should be updated by now. KH 3D and Birth by Sleep came out some time ago. Is there any new news? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.255.64.114 (talk) 20:25, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Yes, the game hasn't been released yet and there hasn't been much change to it, but 3D did just come out, so it's obvious where Square's attention has been focused. Also, this article does have several third party, verifiable sources (which is more than can be said for some more "legitimate" pages). As for not knowing if the game will exist, that has been confirmed (and in the article, no less!), it's just taking some time.

Rumor vs Rumour

I noticed an IP changed the heading from Rumours and speculation to Rumors and speculation. Not knowing if I should revert I did a search and got five instances of 'rumour' and four of 'rumor', however one 'rumor' is in the Contents box due to the heading, and one in a reference. This suggests that in-article 'rumour' is favoured (or favored), so I've changed all to that for now (aside the reference for accuracy). I don't have a preference either way, I just wanted it consistant. BulbaThor (talk) 09:31, 12 October 2011 (UTC) [reply]

It's a spelling difference between American English and British English. Just like Airplane/Aeroplane, Color/Colour, etc. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 12:20, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Expectations?

It all seems like baseless speculation by one guy, as well as his criticism of the series' output in general. If no one has a reason why it should stay, I'm going to remove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.81.152 (talk) 05:04, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]