Jump to content

User talk:XxTR1CKZzxx

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by XxTR1CKZzxx (talk | contribs) at 14:29, 23 July 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Leave me a message, please u know u want to. ;D

July 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:36, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at How to Draw Manga, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. WaggersTALK 21:03, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. WaggersTALK 21:11, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

XxTR1CKZzxx (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Its been a few days, and its given me a bit of time to allow all of this to cool off. I know that spamming nonsense across several pages and adding unsourced material to articles is not acceptable on the encyclopaedia, as i did not entirely understand your rules. I have now thoroughly read through most areas of consensus and now have a clear idea of the areas I will work towards improving if you decide to unblock me.--XxTR1CKZzxx (talk) 12:13, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No useful edits whatsoever from this vandal. --jpgordon::==( o ) 14:16, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

XxTR1CKZzxx (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Yes, I accept the fact that my edits were not useful, but I shall make them useful and I will research my facts before inserting them into articles, and I won't slip back into being an immature vandal like I was a few days ago. Everything's fine as far as I'm concerned, I'm ready to contribute usefully and if I ever vandalise again, I understand that if I start vandalising again I will be reblocked, so this is me telling you that everything's sorted and I'm promising you that from now on, I will only make sensible edits.--XxTR1CKZzxx (talk) 14:29, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sorry, not convinced, I see no reason to trust you Jac16888 Talk 18:29, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

XxTR1CKZzxx (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Gave myself a little more time to set out an organised plan of what I want to do should I get unblocked. For a start, despite the fact that my previous edits were vandalisim, they will all become useful and I am happy to discuss my plan of action with any admin who leaves a comment about it on my talk page (or comments on this request). Edits will be well-sourced and clearly written, and I will also contribute to articles talk pages to discuss possible methods of bringing an article up to scratch. Again, sincere apologies for my previous childishness, it shall not occur again. Thank you.--XxTR1CKZzxx (talk) 13:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Gave myself a little more time to set out an organised plan of what I want to do should I get unblocked. For a start, despite the fact that my previous edits were vandalisim, they will all become useful and I am happy to discuss my plan of action with any admin who leaves a comment about it on my talk page (or comments on this request). Edits will be well-sourced and clearly written, and I will also contribute to articles talk pages to discuss possible methods of bringing an article up to scratch. Again, sincere apologies for my previous childishness, it shall not occur again. Thank you.--[[User:XxTR1CKZzxx|XxTR1CKZzxx]] ([[User talk:XxTR1CKZzxx#top|talk]]) 13:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Gave myself a little more time to set out an organised plan of what I want to do should I get unblocked. For a start, despite the fact that my previous edits were vandalisim, they will all become useful and I am happy to discuss my plan of action with any admin who leaves a comment about it on my talk page (or comments on this request). Edits will be well-sourced and clearly written, and I will also contribute to articles talk pages to discuss possible methods of bringing an article up to scratch. Again, sincere apologies for my previous childishness, it shall not occur again. Thank you.--[[User:XxTR1CKZzxx|XxTR1CKZzxx]] ([[User talk:XxTR1CKZzxx#top|talk]]) 13:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Gave myself a little more time to set out an organised plan of what I want to do should I get unblocked. For a start, despite the fact that my previous edits were vandalisim, they will all become useful and I am happy to discuss my plan of action with any admin who leaves a comment about it on my talk page (or comments on this request). Edits will be well-sourced and clearly written, and I will also contribute to articles talk pages to discuss possible methods of bringing an article up to scratch. Again, sincere apologies for my previous childishness, it shall not occur again. Thank you.--[[User:XxTR1CKZzxx|XxTR1CKZzxx]] ([[User talk:XxTR1CKZzxx#top|talk]]) 13:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Your previous requests for unblocking had been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

  • Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
  • Read our guide to improving articles
  • Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • Click the Edit tab at the top of that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
  • Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = [[Article title]] =) and save the page before you improve it.
  • Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
  • When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Max Semenik (talk) 13:52, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, yes I see no problem with going back through basic Wikipedia rules and guidelines. About improving an article, I'm struggling there, give me some time and we'll hopefully get somewhere on that. Cheers :)--XxTR1CKZzxx (talk) 14:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC) In fact, forget the article Improvement, I'd rather read through the How to improve article page first and then maybe build on that and see where we go from there.--XxTR1CKZzxx (talk) 14:29, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]