Jump to content

User talk:Skoranka

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Space Cadet (talk | contribs) at 22:31, 29 July 2012 (→‎Disruptive editing warning on Meissen). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Witaj ! / Welcome!

Hello, Skoranka, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  - Darwinek 14:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Hi Skoranka!
We thank you for uploading Image:Gdańsk Długi Targ.JPG, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 14:42, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Monitor. WikiProject Poland Newsletter: Issue 1 (April 2011)

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • April 2011
For our freedom and yours

Welcome to our first issue of WikiProject Poland newsletter, the Monitor (named after the first Polish newspaper).

Our Project has been operational since 1 June, 2005, and also serves as the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions. We hope you will join us in them, if you haven't done so already! Unlike many other WikiProjects, we are quite active; in this year alone about 40 threads have been started on our discussion page, and we do a pretty good job at answering all issues raised.

In addition to a lively encyclopedic, Poland-related, English-language discussion forum, we have numerous useful tools that can be of use to you - and that you could help us maintain and develop:

This is not all; on our page you can find a list of useful templates (including userboxes), awards and other tools!

With all that said, how about you join our discussions at WT:POLAND? Surely, there must be something you could help others with, or perhaps you are in need of assistance yourself?

You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a [member link] at WikiProject Poland. • Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:22, 25 April 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Royal Prussia

Your recent editing history at Royal Prussia shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

  • The article is affected by the Gdańsk (Danzig) Vote. The result is binding on all parties. Violations against the rule established by the outcome of this vote can be reverted exempt from the 3RR rule. ⇒⇒ "For locations that share a history between Germany and Poland, the first reference of one name should also include a reference to other commonly used names, e.g. Stettin (now Szczecin, Poland) or Szczecin (Stettin)."
  • Persistent reverts in violation of the outcome of this vote despite multiple warnings may be dealt with according to the rules in Wikipedia:Dealing with vandalism.

--IIIraute (talk) 15:46, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

personal attack

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. [1] --IIIraute (talk) 00:20, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You lied in your declaration and that's a fact. You constantly attack other users, accuse them of violations and you're far from "staying cool" but that's OK, right? Skoranka (talk) 00:25, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Łeba

My family owns a factory near Łeba, employing almost 2000 polish citizens. You are welcome to visit (in case you are looking for work). I have lived for months in the Hotel Neptun in Łeba. It is very beautiful there.--IIIraute (talk) 08:48, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invite. My user page is not updated. I currently don't reside in Poland. But next time I go, I will let you know in advance. Also, thanks for proper spelling of Łeba and Neptun. Skoranka (talk) 21:57, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing warning on Meissen

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Meissen. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 22:13, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing "disruptive" or "unconstructive" about restoring simple, uncontroversial format consistency. Stop blabbering and do something "constructive" yourself. Space Cadet (talk) 22:31, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]