Jump to content

User talk:116.120.84.244

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ocean Shores (talk | contribs) at 23:45, 31 July 2012 (Warning: Removal of content, blanking on Zulfiya Chinshanlo. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made to Sanduleak -69° 202. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (116.120.84.244) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask for help at the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 08:43, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

I reverted your edits at Sanduleak -69° 202 and Betelgeuse - the numbers you left are plausible, but you cited no references. If you have references, please re-make your edits with such citations. Thank you, Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 08:45, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at World Miss University. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:29, 22 April 2012 (UTC) [reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
My apologies--those edits were 100% correct and not at all vandalism; I was editing too quickly. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:29, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Kaia Kanepi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Nug (talk) 20:50, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Maret Ani shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Nug (talk) 20:50, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Estonia place of birth situation

Hello. I left you a message on my talk page, however in the meantime I noteced that the edit-warring continued in the article afterwords. I left a message to User:Estland on his talk page, User_talk:Estlandia#Edit_warring. The other users are edit warring you in group, however in some situations I see that unfortunatelly you and some of them, all broke Wikipedia:3RR rule. I am not an administrator, so I don´t have the power to take any administrative action, however, in case of them continuing to revert, I think the best solution is to report them at Wikipedia:ANI which will thus bring it to administrators attention. In case of them opening a discussion, it would be good to participate and expose your views. Lets see what happends. Best regards, FkpCascais (talk) 07:21, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much.--116.120.84.244 (talk) 07:31, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
User:Nug reported you here. I left a comment there. FkpCascais (talk) 08:01, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I edited Kerli, too.--116.120.84.244 (talk) 08:21, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In the meantime another user has reverted you but I left him a message at his talk page. Please don´t revert anymore as you have reverted already quite a lot and as we see, they don´t give up, so reverting wan´t lead to nowhere. Lets see what administrators will decide at the report which was done against you. If you feel appropriate you can allways leave a comment there explaining the situation although I already said part of it. I will have to go to work so I may be abscent for some time during the next hours, however I will take a look at what happend as soon as I return. Best regards, FkpCascais (talk) 08:46, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK, Thank you so much!--116.120.84.244 (talk) 08:57, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --Nug (talk) 08:44, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Maret Ani. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:24, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z10

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Why should I be the only one to be punished? Please see [1]--116.120.84.244 (talk) 09:36, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You aren't. I blocked the other guy too. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:42, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry. It was my mistake.--116.120.84.244 (talk) 09:47, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I left you an answer on my talk page - I usually respond on my talk page when a question is made to me there, in order to keep the conversations together. I asked administrator User:Future Perfect at Sunrise at his talk page for an advice on this situation. Lest wait to see what he has to say and please don´t edit-war again as if you do you may be blocked again. Wikipedia says that editors should not edit-war, even if they are right, but should rather seek for help, as we already did. FkpCascais (talk) 11:18, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thank you for all your help.--116.120.84.244 (talk) 12:19, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you again, as you continued edit-warring immediately after coming back from your last block. I'm also giving you this general warning now:

File:Yes
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Eastern Europe. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:44, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Terence Tao, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 02:13, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Zulfiya Chinshanlo, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ocean Shores 23:45, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:116.120.84.244&oldid=505180270"